Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Fda Releases Study On Cross-contamination


jenvan

Recommended Posts

jenvan Collaborator

Here is link to full document, or summary below. (This was in Clan Thompson newsletter)

Open Original Shared Link (Makes me think twice...)

The FDA's report to Congress regarding cross-contact with food allergens during

food manufacturing and distribution, and consumer preferences about advisory

labeling is out. This report was required as part of the Food Allergen Labeling

and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) and states that foods may become

unintentionally contaminated with major food allergens at almost any step of

manufacturing prior to final packaging. For instance, contamination can occur as

a result of allergens in raw ingredients or in processing aids, or as a result

of allergen carry-over from the use of shared equipment and from clean-in-place

fluid used to clean shared equipment. Dedicated facilities or production lines

can help control cross contamination, but their use is limited due to cost,

space limitations or equipment utilization needs.

It is difficult to determine the prevalence of cross-contamination for several

reasons, according to the FDA. Many instances of cross contamination are not

observable. For example, a raw ingredient can contain an undeclared allergenic

ingredient or processing aid. If the manufacturer doesn't know about the

presence of allergens in raw materials, they can produce food products that are

contaminated.

There is no known processing technology that can be used to automatically or

continuously exclude major allergens from all foods at risk of contamination.

However, good manufacturing practices help reduce or eliminate unintentional

cross contamination. A report prepared for the Center for Food Safety and

Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) by the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) states

the following: "Most food companies include allergen control as part of their

prerequisite program; most of the food companies have Sanitation Standard

Operating Procedures to delineate their cleaning practices in their allergen

control plan; the majority of the targeted food companies have validated the

effectiveness of their allergen cleaning approaches;" and "the majority of

included food companies train employees on an annual basis on topics related to

allergens."

Between FY2002-FY2004, the FDA conducted over 2,000 allergen-focused

inspections. Investigators determined that allergen cross-contact was likely to

occur in 25% of all inspected facilities during processing of food products.

Sources of contamination included residues of allergen-containing product on

equipment, build-up of product above the processing zone, and presence of

airborne food particles. Overall, equipment residues were judged to be the most

likely source of cross contamination, followed by airborne food particles, and

build-up of product above the processing zone.

Investigators also determined that 76% of all facilities handled unpackaged,

exposed product in a way to protect it against cross contamination with an

allergen.

Inspections done in FY2003-2004 found similar results with respect to receiving,

equipment, processing, testing, and labeling. However, for FY2003-2004, 79% of

the inspected facilities used one or more control measures associated with

production equipment to prevent allergen cross-contact compared to just 8% of

the FY2002 facilities. In the FY2003-2004 inspections, of the facilities that

tried to control cross contamination from equipment, 33% used dedicated

equipment, 74% used shared equipment with clean up in between manufacture of the

allergen containing product and the non-allergen containing product, 41% used

shared equipment with production scheduled to run allergenic product last, and

8.5% used other methods.

For facilities inspected in FY2003-2004, FDA investigators judged that 24% were

likely to have cross contact during processing compared to 25% in FY2002.

Data from the these inspections are not a representative sample of all

manufacturers using the most common food allergens, and the results should not

be generalized to all food production facilities, according to the FDA. The

facilities were selected based on certain criteria and not in an entirely random

fashion. Nevertheless, the results of these inspections provide insight into

current efforts to address the risks of food allergen cross contamination. Taken

together, the findings in the report suggest that a certain percentage of

facilities do attempt to address potential concerns associated with the use of

allegens in food products, but the extent to which a company does so varies.

Some companies did not apply any control measures in the handling and use of

allergens.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Jen,

Thanks for posting that!

Laura

jenvan Collaborator
Great post.

Though, now it just makes me even more paranoid about CC issues.

Perhaps with the added awareness, something will be done to address the very real issue of CC.

It does bring out the paranoia. I just think of stories of people dropping things, like body parts for example, in big vats of food and not reporting it :o

TriticusToxicum Explorer
I just think of stories of people dropping things, like body parts for example, in big vats of food and not reporting it :o

Now THAT'S something the FDA ought to be looking into!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      12

      My only proof

    2. - NanceK replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      12

      My only proof

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      39

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      39

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      39

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,369
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carole Eva
    Newest Member
    Carole Eva
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      You're right, doctors usually only test Vitamin D and B12.  Both are really important, but they're not good indicators of deficiencies in the other B vitamins.  Our bodies are able to store Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in the liver for up to a year or longer.  The other B vitamins can only be stored for much shorter periods of time.  Pyridoxine B 6 can be stored for several months, but the others only a month or two at the longest.  Thiamine stores can be depleted in as little as three days.  There's no correlation between B12 levels and the other B vitamins' levels.  Blood tests can't measure the amount of vitamins stored inside cells where they are used.  There's disagreement as to what optimal vitamin levels are.  The Recommended Daily Allowance is based on the minimum daily amount needed to prevent disease set back in the forties when people ate a totally different diet and gruesome experiments were done on people.  Folate  requirements had to be updated in the nineties after spina bifida increased and synthetic folic acid was mandated to be added to grain products.  Vitamin D requirements have been updated only in the past few years.   Doctors aren't required to take as many hours of nutritional education as in the past.  They're educated in learning institutions funded by pharmaceutical corporations.  Natural substances like vitamins can't be patented, so there's more money to be made prescribing pharmaceuticals than vitamins.   Also, look into the Autoimmune Protocol Diet, developed by Dr. Sarah Ballantyne, a Celiac herself.  Her book The Paleo Approach has been most helpful to me.  You're very welcome.  I'm glad I can help you around some stumbling blocks while on this journey.    Keep me posted on your progress!  Best wishes! P.S.  interesting reading: Thiamine, gastrointestinal beriberi and acetylcholine signaling https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12014454/
    • NanceK
      So interesting that you stated you had sub clinical vitamin deficiencies. When I was first diagnosed with celiac disease (silent), the vitamin levels my doctor did test for were mostly within normal range (lower end) with the exception of vitamin D. I believe he tested D, B12, magnesium, and iron.  I wondered how it was possible that I had celiac disease without being deficient in everything!  I’m wondering now if I have subclinical vitamin deficiencies as well, because even though I remain gluten free, I struggle with insomnia, low energy, body aches, etc.  It’s truly frustrating when you stay true to the gluten-free diet, yet feel fatigued most days. I’ll definitely try the B-complex, and the Benfotiamine again, and will keep you posted. Thanks once again!
    • knitty kitty
      Segments of the protein Casein are the same as segments of the protein strands of gluten, the 33-mer segment.   The cow's body builds that Casein protein.  It doesn't come from wheat.   Casein can trigger the same reaction as being exposed to gluten in some people.   This is not a dairy allergy (IGE mediated response).  It is not lactose intolerance.  
    • trents
      Wheatwacked, what exactly did you intend when you stated that wheat is incorporated into the milk of cows fed wheat? Obviously, the gluten would be broken down by digestion and is too large a molecule anyway to cross the intestinal membrane and get into the bloodstream of the cow. What is it from the wheat that you are saying becomes incorporated into the milk protein?
    • Scott Adams
      Wheat in cow feed would not equal gluten in the milk, @Wheatwacked, please back up extraordinary claims like this with some scientific backing, as I've never heard that cow's milk could contain gluten due to what the cow eats.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.