Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Fda Releases Study On Cross-contamination


jenvan

Recommended Posts

jenvan Collaborator

Here is link to full document, or summary below. (This was in Clan Thompson newsletter)

Open Original Shared Link (Makes me think twice...)

The FDA's report to Congress regarding cross-contact with food allergens during

food manufacturing and distribution, and consumer preferences about advisory

labeling is out. This report was required as part of the Food Allergen Labeling

and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) and states that foods may become

unintentionally contaminated with major food allergens at almost any step of

manufacturing prior to final packaging. For instance, contamination can occur as

a result of allergens in raw ingredients or in processing aids, or as a result

of allergen carry-over from the use of shared equipment and from clean-in-place

fluid used to clean shared equipment. Dedicated facilities or production lines

can help control cross contamination, but their use is limited due to cost,

space limitations or equipment utilization needs.

It is difficult to determine the prevalence of cross-contamination for several

reasons, according to the FDA. Many instances of cross contamination are not

observable. For example, a raw ingredient can contain an undeclared allergenic

ingredient or processing aid. If the manufacturer doesn't know about the

presence of allergens in raw materials, they can produce food products that are

contaminated.

There is no known processing technology that can be used to automatically or

continuously exclude major allergens from all foods at risk of contamination.

However, good manufacturing practices help reduce or eliminate unintentional

cross contamination. A report prepared for the Center for Food Safety and

Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) by the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) states

the following: "Most food companies include allergen control as part of their

prerequisite program; most of the food companies have Sanitation Standard

Operating Procedures to delineate their cleaning practices in their allergen

control plan; the majority of the targeted food companies have validated the

effectiveness of their allergen cleaning approaches;" and "the majority of

included food companies train employees on an annual basis on topics related to

allergens."

Between FY2002-FY2004, the FDA conducted over 2,000 allergen-focused

inspections. Investigators determined that allergen cross-contact was likely to

occur in 25% of all inspected facilities during processing of food products.

Sources of contamination included residues of allergen-containing product on

equipment, build-up of product above the processing zone, and presence of

airborne food particles. Overall, equipment residues were judged to be the most

likely source of cross contamination, followed by airborne food particles, and

build-up of product above the processing zone.

Investigators also determined that 76% of all facilities handled unpackaged,

exposed product in a way to protect it against cross contamination with an

allergen.

Inspections done in FY2003-2004 found similar results with respect to receiving,

equipment, processing, testing, and labeling. However, for FY2003-2004, 79% of

the inspected facilities used one or more control measures associated with

production equipment to prevent allergen cross-contact compared to just 8% of

the FY2002 facilities. In the FY2003-2004 inspections, of the facilities that

tried to control cross contamination from equipment, 33% used dedicated

equipment, 74% used shared equipment with clean up in between manufacture of the

allergen containing product and the non-allergen containing product, 41% used

shared equipment with production scheduled to run allergenic product last, and

8.5% used other methods.

For facilities inspected in FY2003-2004, FDA investigators judged that 24% were

likely to have cross contact during processing compared to 25% in FY2002.

Data from the these inspections are not a representative sample of all

manufacturers using the most common food allergens, and the results should not

be generalized to all food production facilities, according to the FDA. The

facilities were selected based on certain criteria and not in an entirely random

fashion. Nevertheless, the results of these inspections provide insight into

current efforts to address the risks of food allergen cross contamination. Taken

together, the findings in the report suggest that a certain percentage of

facilities do attempt to address potential concerns associated with the use of

allegens in food products, but the extent to which a company does so varies.

Some companies did not apply any control measures in the handling and use of

allergens.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Jen,

Thanks for posting that!

Laura

jenvan Collaborator
Great post.

Though, now it just makes me even more paranoid about CC issues.

Perhaps with the added awareness, something will be done to address the very real issue of CC.

It does bring out the paranoia. I just think of stories of people dropping things, like body parts for example, in big vats of food and not reporting it :o

TriticusToxicum Explorer
I just think of stories of people dropping things, like body parts for example, in big vats of food and not reporting it :o

Now THAT'S something the FDA ought to be looking into!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Known1 replied to Known1's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      16

      Diagnosed Marsh stage 3C in January 2026

    2. - HectorConvector replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      319

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

    3. - HectorConvector replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      319

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

    4. - HectorConvector replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      319

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

    5. - knitty kitty replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      319

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,589
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozibella
    Newest Member
    Ozibella
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Known1
      @knitty kitty Holy smokes, that Life Extension B-Complex is burning me up.  My multi-vitamin already has 25mg of Niacin.  The b-complex adds another 100mg on top of that.  My face, neck, and ears look like the Cardinal I use for my profile pic.  I have been on the b-complex for 10-days now and it seems to get a bit worse with each passing day.  I think I am going to drop down to taking 1/2 of the serving size.  In other words, 1 capsule instead of 2.  Hopefully dropping to one does the trick. Have you noticed any side effects from that B-complex?  It is WAY over the daily recommended values: Thanks for your time, Known1
    • HectorConvector
      Evidence from normoglycaemic studies shows that healthy people peak at ~1 hour, and they then return to baseline in 2–3 hours, not 1. CGM shows normal post-meal rises even in metabolically healthy subjects. Clinical tests use the 2-hour value to judge normal glucose clearance. Therefore the 1-hour-back-to-fasting claim contradicts both physiology and clinical diagnostic standards.
    • HectorConvector
      I'm not sure what you're referring to as "normal" here - and is this something your doctor has mentioned (in bold)? As that isn't what any study or official information says. According to diabetes UK and the British Heart Foundation, normal fasting blood sugar is 4.9-5.4mmol/L. Normal by 2 hours from the start of a meal is anywhere below 7.8mmol/L. Random (more than 2 hours after a meal) should be below 5.6mmol/L.  Not in any study of normoglyceamic individuals does blood sugar go down to less than 5.4mmol/L one hour from the start of a meal, and I don't see such numbers being considered a limit for one hour post prandial in any official definition of normal blood sugar ranges anywhere. It is basically impossible even for the most metabolically healthy individual to have a blood sugar level anything like a fasting number 1 hour only after eating a high carb meal. This is also why medical standards use the 2-hour postprandial value, not 1 hour. Blood sugar normally spikes at about 1 hour after a high carb meal.  For example this study shows that young, healthy normoglycaemic people experience a 1hr peak blood sugar level of about 6.5-7mmol/L before which the 2hr number returns to about 4.7mmol/L, slightly higher than the fasting number of that morning. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2769652/?utm_source=chatgpt.com Even a normal person isn't going to be seeing essentially fasting blood sugar numbers after any meal except for one with 0 carbohdrates contents.
    • HectorConvector
      My skin biopsy and MRI scan shows no signs of any type of nerve damage. Nothing consistent with demylination or peripheral nerve damage. On the contrary, the nerve function from the skin biopsy proved better than normal. I don't get any pins and needles or have any loss of nerve function. It's pain only.  Thiamin I take is 100mg a day in tablet. I used to test blood sugar a lot in the past, and it never correlated directly with the nerve pain. It has only correlated with increased exercise and stress. The after eating getting worse thing happens when the blood flow is directed to the stomach for digestion away from the peripheral areas, which is normal, but central sensitization has caused normal sensations to be turned into pain by the brain, according to the latest doctors, hence whey I am being referred to the pain clinic.
    • knitty kitty
      @HectorConvector, My blood glucose level would spike after I ate.  It wouldn't return to "normal" fasting blood glucose level for longer and longer.  Blood glucose level should return to normal an hour after eating.  Mine would take two hours, then three hours, then longer.  So over night fasting blood tests wouldn't necessarily be very high until they got really bad.  But the peripheral neuropathy would feel the worst while my glucose was too high.  My blood glucose meter confirmed this.   On top of all that, my Celiac disease was still undiagnosed at the time, and I was suffering from malabsorption and nutritional deficiencies.  The deficiencies in B vitamins affected not just insulin production in the pancreas, but also the nerves in my extremities.  Nerves need B vitamins to maintain the myelin sheath protecting the nerves (like the plastic coating on electrical wires) when they fire.  When the myelin sheath is not maintained, that "pins and needles" feeling starts and increases as more of the sheath is damaged.  My parathesia progressed until the "pins and needles" went from my toes all the way up to my thighs.   Without sufficient vitamins, I started slowly losing weight.  Our bodies will start using not only stored fat, but also tear down our own muscles to provide fuel for the body to stay functional.   I hope you don't have pre-diabetes or diabetes.  Most diabetics have a thiamine deficiency.   How much thiamine are you taking?  What form of Thiamine are you taking?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.