Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Fda Releases Study On Cross-contamination


jenvan

Recommended Posts

jenvan Collaborator

Here is link to full document, or summary below. (This was in Clan Thompson newsletter)

Open Original Shared Link (Makes me think twice...)

The FDA's report to Congress regarding cross-contact with food allergens during

food manufacturing and distribution, and consumer preferences about advisory

labeling is out. This report was required as part of the Food Allergen Labeling

and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) and states that foods may become

unintentionally contaminated with major food allergens at almost any step of

manufacturing prior to final packaging. For instance, contamination can occur as

a result of allergens in raw ingredients or in processing aids, or as a result

of allergen carry-over from the use of shared equipment and from clean-in-place

fluid used to clean shared equipment. Dedicated facilities or production lines

can help control cross contamination, but their use is limited due to cost,

space limitations or equipment utilization needs.

It is difficult to determine the prevalence of cross-contamination for several

reasons, according to the FDA. Many instances of cross contamination are not

observable. For example, a raw ingredient can contain an undeclared allergenic

ingredient or processing aid. If the manufacturer doesn't know about the

presence of allergens in raw materials, they can produce food products that are

contaminated.

There is no known processing technology that can be used to automatically or

continuously exclude major allergens from all foods at risk of contamination.

However, good manufacturing practices help reduce or eliminate unintentional

cross contamination. A report prepared for the Center for Food Safety and

Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) by the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) states

the following: "Most food companies include allergen control as part of their

prerequisite program; most of the food companies have Sanitation Standard

Operating Procedures to delineate their cleaning practices in their allergen

control plan; the majority of the targeted food companies have validated the

effectiveness of their allergen cleaning approaches;" and "the majority of

included food companies train employees on an annual basis on topics related to

allergens."

Between FY2002-FY2004, the FDA conducted over 2,000 allergen-focused

inspections. Investigators determined that allergen cross-contact was likely to

occur in 25% of all inspected facilities during processing of food products.

Sources of contamination included residues of allergen-containing product on

equipment, build-up of product above the processing zone, and presence of

airborne food particles. Overall, equipment residues were judged to be the most

likely source of cross contamination, followed by airborne food particles, and

build-up of product above the processing zone.

Investigators also determined that 76% of all facilities handled unpackaged,

exposed product in a way to protect it against cross contamination with an

allergen.

Inspections done in FY2003-2004 found similar results with respect to receiving,

equipment, processing, testing, and labeling. However, for FY2003-2004, 79% of

the inspected facilities used one or more control measures associated with

production equipment to prevent allergen cross-contact compared to just 8% of

the FY2002 facilities. In the FY2003-2004 inspections, of the facilities that

tried to control cross contamination from equipment, 33% used dedicated

equipment, 74% used shared equipment with clean up in between manufacture of the

allergen containing product and the non-allergen containing product, 41% used

shared equipment with production scheduled to run allergenic product last, and

8.5% used other methods.

For facilities inspected in FY2003-2004, FDA investigators judged that 24% were

likely to have cross contact during processing compared to 25% in FY2002.

Data from the these inspections are not a representative sample of all

manufacturers using the most common food allergens, and the results should not

be generalized to all food production facilities, according to the FDA. The

facilities were selected based on certain criteria and not in an entirely random

fashion. Nevertheless, the results of these inspections provide insight into

current efforts to address the risks of food allergen cross contamination. Taken

together, the findings in the report suggest that a certain percentage of

facilities do attempt to address potential concerns associated with the use of

allegens in food products, but the extent to which a company does so varies.

Some companies did not apply any control measures in the handling and use of

allergens.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Jen,

Thanks for posting that!

Laura

jenvan Collaborator
Great post.

Though, now it just makes me even more paranoid about CC issues.

Perhaps with the added awareness, something will be done to address the very real issue of CC.

It does bring out the paranoia. I just think of stories of people dropping things, like body parts for example, in big vats of food and not reporting it :o

TriticusToxicum Explorer
I just think of stories of people dropping things, like body parts for example, in big vats of food and not reporting it :o

Now THAT'S something the FDA ought to be looking into!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Charlie1946 replied to Charlie1946's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      43

      Severe severe mouth pain

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      0

      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

    3. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Gluten-Free Recipes & Cooking Tips
      1

      heaps of hope!

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Jordan Carlson's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Fruits & Veggies

    5. - Scott Adams replied to yellowstone's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Cold/flu or gluten poisoning?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,093
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Susanne G
    Newest Member
    Susanne G
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Charlie1946
      @knitty kitty Thank you so much for all that information! I will be sure to check it out and ask my doctor.  I am just at a loss, I am on my 2nd round of miracle mouthwash and I brush and scrape my tongue and (sorry this is gross) it's still coated in the middle 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Traditional brown rice vinegars are made by fermenting brown rice and water with koji (Kōji 麹). The gluten risk comes from the method of preparing the koji: rice, wheat or barley may be used. Regardless of the starting grain, "koji" typically will be listed as an ingredient, and that term alone does not indicate gluten status. I called Eden Foods regarding their product "Organic Brown Rice Vinegar" (product of Japan) to ask how their product is made. They gave me a clear answer that they >do< use rice and they >do not< use wheat or barley in preparing their koji. FWIW, the product itself does not contain any labeling about gluten, gluten risk, or gluten safety. Based on Eden's statement, I am going to trust that this product is gluten safe and use it.
    • Scott Adams
      Your post nails the practical reality of living well with a celiac diagnosis. The shift from feeling restricted to discovering a new world of cooking—whether through a supportive partner making gluten-free spanakopita and gravy, or learning to cook for yourself—is exactly how many people find their footing. It turns a medical necessity into a chance to build kitchen skills, eat more whole foods, and actually enjoy the process. Your point that the basics—knife skills, food safety, and experimenting with spices—are all you really need is solid, helpful advice. It’s a good reminder that the diagnosis, while a pain, doesn’t have to stop you from eating well or having fun with food.
    • Scott Adams
      You are experiencing a remarkable recovery by addressing core nutrient deficiencies, yet you've uncovered a deeper, lifelong intolerance to fruits and vegetables that appears to be a distinct issue from celiac disease. Your experience points strongly toward a separate condition, likely Oral Allergy Syndrome (OAS) or a non-IgE food intolerance, such as salicylate or histamine intolerance. The instant burning, heart palpitations, and anxiety you describe are classic systemic reactions to food chemicals, not typical celiac reactions. It makes perfect sense that your body rejected these foods from birth; the gagging was likely a neurological reflex to a perceived toxin. Now that your gut has healed, you're feeling the inflammatory response internally instead. The path forward involves targeted elimination: try cooking fruits and vegetables (which often breaks down the problematic proteins/chemicals), focus on low-histamine and low-salicylate options (e.g., peeled pears, zucchini), and consider working with an allergist or dietitian specializing in food chemical intolerances. 
    • Scott Adams
      Your satiation is challenging and a common dilemma for those with celiac disease or non-celiac gluten sensitivity: distinguishing between a routine viral illness and a reaction to gluten exposure. The overlap in symptoms—fatigue, malaise, body aches, and general inflammation—makes it nearly impossible to tell them apart in the moment, especially with a hypersensitive system. This ambiguity is a significant source of anxiety. The key differentiator often lies in the symptom pattern and accompanying signs: gluten reactions frequently include distinct digestive upset (bloating, diarrhea), neurological symptoms like "brain fog," or a specific rash (dermatitis herpetiformis), and they persist without the respiratory symptoms (runny nose, sore throat) typical of a cold. Tracking your symptoms meticulously after any exposure and during illnesses can help identify your personal patterns. Ultimately, your experience underscores the reality that for a sensitive body, any immune stressor—be it gluten or a virus—can trigger a severe and similar inflammatory cascade, making vigilant management of your diet all the more critical. Have you had a blood panel done for celiac disease? This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.