Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Received Lab Results - Completely Confused


Lawspike

Recommended Posts

Lawspike Rookie

How in the world did my initial lab work come back negative????

I just picked up a copy of my lab results, still waiting on one result, but here is the lab results so far and biopsy results:

IgA: 58 (ref range: 19 units or less - neg

20-30 units: week positive

30 units or greater:: positive

IgG: 44 (ref range: 19 units or less - neg

20-30 units: week positive

30 units or greater:: positive

Biopsy: Moderate to severe villous blunting with intraepithelial lymphocytosis and mononuclear cell expansion of the lamina propria, most consistent with gluten sensitive enteropathy (sprue).

I CLEARLY have Celiac. So, my question is... what is the point of the initial lab work - especially if it is giving a MAJOR false negative!??

My initial la work is as follows:

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody, IgA : 12 (ref range 0-19)

It goes on to state:

If Tissue Transglutaminase Ab, IgA is negative, the Endomysial Ab, IgA Titer by IFA is not performed.

IgA antibody against human tTG, if detected at a level greater than 19 units, may suggest the possibility of certain gluten sensitive enteropathies such as celiac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis.

I also had high TP, high ALB, high RBC, low MCV and low FER on initial labwork.. all classic *signs*

I CLEARLY HAVE celiac (as per the biopsy and follow up lab work and I HAVE DH (on head, arms and back).... ) How could I get a false negative when my numbers above are soooo high?!?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Thats why I always tell folks to try the diet no matter what the test results. I don't know why false negatives occur but they do and they delayed my diagnosis for a very, very long time as the doctors relied on those false negative tests.

On the good side, now you know and can start healing.

ang1e0251 Contributor

I am no expert on blood work but so-o-o many people comment here how there initial tests are negative that I just have to think that there must high numbers of false negatives. I just really think a better diagnostic test would be much more valuable. How many persons continue to eat gluten damaging their bodies because of these tests?

Lynayah Enthusiast

My first test was negative, too. I didn't know I had to eat gluten for 8 weeks before being tested - doc at the time didn't tell me. I have another test coming up in August. As I wait, I am actually afraid the next test will come back neg., too -- possibly because the doc hasn't asked me to eat enough gluten each day in prep. I know I have either gluten-intolorance or celiac disease -- no doubt. I just thank goodness for this forum where I know I am not alone.

I remember reading somewhere that when you have DH - the skin disorder -- they can biopsy the skin to test for celiac disease. Forgive if I missed it in your post (I'm not the best at reading medical "stuff"), but did you have the skin biopsy done?

In the meantime, please know you are not alone. Many of us have been told "negative," only to continue with life thinking we're fine . . . and yet have symptoms, problems, confusion. There is still so much that medical science still needs to learn, perfect or discover. It is up to us to help direct them. Everything happens for a reason, so they say.

Hang in there. Keep using this forum for support.

Sending a big hug,

Lyn

gfb1 Rookie
How in the world did my initial lab work come back negative????

[snip]

I CLEARLY HAVE celiac (as per the biopsy and follow up lab work and I HAVE DH (on head, arms and back).... ) How could I get a false negative when my numbers above are soooo high?!?

as others have said, your case is (sadly) not unusual.

being a diedinthewoolwordparsingacademic, imho, i do disagree that you had a 'false negative'.

blood tests just measure stuff in the blood, and there is a lower limit of detection.

your body, health and wellbeing are much more sensitive to changes in 'state' than any blood test. however, it is exceedingly difficult to trust yourself to know you are, indeed, sick; when you get a printout saying that you are 'negative' or 'normal' (whatever that is...).

in fact, most people feel lousy BEFORE blood tests actually become 'positive'. this is why you feel sick, THEN go to the doctor -- not blood test yourself every month to see if you are BECOMING sick....

:)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to Heatherisle's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      34

      Blood results

    2. - Known1 replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      31

      results from 13 day gluten challenge - does this mean I can't have celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      31

      results from 13 day gluten challenge - does this mean I can't have celiac?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,411
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    EBeloved
    Newest Member
    EBeloved
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
    • Wheatwacked
      Celiac Disease causes more vitamin D deficiency than the general population because of limited UV sunlight in the winter and the little available from food is not absorbed well in the damaged small intestine.  Taking 10,000 IU a day (250 mcg) a day broke my depression. Taking it for eleven years.  Doctor recently said to not stop.  My 25(OH)D is around 200 nmol/L (80 ng/ml) but it took about six years to get there.  Increasing vitamin D also increases absorption of Calcium. A good start is 100-gram (3.5-ounce) serving of salmon,  vitamin D from 7.5 to 25 mcg (300 to 1,000 IU) but it is going to take additional vitamin D supplement to be effective.  More importantly salmon has an omega-6 to omega-3 ratio 1:10 anti-inflammatory compared to the 15:1 infammatory ratio of the typical Western diet. Vitamin D and Depression: Where is all the Sunshine?
    • Known1
      Thank you for sharing your thoughts.  I respectfully disagree.  You cherry picked a small section from the page.  I will do the same below: The agency is seeking information on adverse reactions due to “ingredients of interest” (i.e., non-wheat gluten containing grains (GCGs) which are rye and barley, and oats due to cross-contact with GCGs) and on labeling issues or concerns with identifying these “ingredients of interest” on packaged food products in the U.S. “People with celiac disease or gluten sensitives have had to tiptoe around food, and are often forced to guess about their food options,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H. “We encourage all stakeholders to share their experiences and data to help us develop policies that will better protect Americans and support healthy food choices.” --- end quote Anyone with celiac disease is clearly a stakeholder.  The FDA is encouraging us to share our experiences along with any data to help develop future "policies that will better protect Americans and support healthy food choices".  I see this as our chance to speak up or forever hold our peace.  Like those that do not participate in elections, they are not allowed to complain.  The way I see it, if we do not participate in this request for public comment/feedback, then we should also not complain when we get ill from something labeled gluten-free. Have a blessed day ahead, Known1
    • Wheatwacked
      Here is a link to the spreadsheet I kept to track my nutrition intakes.  Maybe it will give you ideas. It is not https so browsers may flag a security warning. There is nothing to send or receive. http://doodlesnotes.net/index3.html I tracked everything I ate, used the National Nutrition Database https://www.foodrisk.org/resources/display/41 to add up my daily intake and supplemented appropriately.  It tracks about 30 nutrients at once.
    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @catnapt, That's so true.  Every person with Celiac Disease has different symptoms.  There are over 200 that it mimics.  Too many still believe that it is only a childhood disease you outgrow.  Or it's psychosomatic or simply a fad.  Idiots.  It's easy to get angry at all of them.   You just have to pick at the answers until you find the ones that work for you.  I too suffer from not being able to take the drugs that work for "everyone else".  SSRIs make me twitch ane feel like toothpicks are holding my eye open, ARBs cripple me.  Statins cause me intestinal Psuedo Obstruction.  Espresso puts me to sleep.  I counted 19 different symptoms that improved from GFD and dealing with my nutritional defecits.  I couldn't breath through my mouth until I started GFD at 64 years old.   My son was born with celiac disease, biopsy diagnosed at weaning.   So why are we the one-percenters.  Why, after being silent for so long, does it suddenly flare? There is the possibility that you have both Celiac Disease and Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity.  NCGS was not established as a diagnosis until 1980.  NCGS is diagnost by first elimating Celiac Disease as the cause, and showing improvement on GFD.  Nothing says you can't have symptoms from both.  Wheatbelly: Total Nutrition by Dr. Davis was helpful to me. We come to the forum to share what we've learned in dealing with our own symptoms.  Maybe this will help someone. Speaking of which if you don't mind; what is your 25(OH)D vitamin D blood level?  You mentioned a mysterious Calcium issue. Vitamin D, Calcium and Iodine are closely interactive. It is not uncommon for postmenopausal women to have insufficient intake of Iodine.   (RDA): Average daily level of intake sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97%–98%) healthy individuals; often used to plan nutritionally adequate diets for individuals You are a one-percenter.  You may need higher intake of some essential nutrient supplements to speed up repairing the damages.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.