Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New To Celiac...


SusanB26

Recommended Posts

SusanB26 Newbie

Hi to everyone.

 

Long story short...  I already have autoimmune thyroid issues (Hashimotos) and unbeknownst to me have had symptoms of having Celiac/Gluten issues for a long time.  Autoimmune issues strongly run in my family; my father and his sibling all have (had) autoimmune disease, Type 1 diabetes, RA, and now we realize my dad most likely had Celiac but passed away from cancer before he could be properly diagnosed-but had lifelong stomach and skin issues.

 

I went to an allergist for allergy testing because I had been feeling so horrible.  Achy, exhausted, gastro issues, acne, eczema, migraines, etc.  Found out I was allergic to onion and garlic (alliums) which has proven difficult but do-able with a lot of work and effort.  He also suggested I go dairy and gluten free and do an oral challenge so I did.  Diary I'm finding I'm ok with in small quantities and never fat-free dairy. Gluten on the other hand?  Once I stopped gluten EVERYTHING went away.  I am never achy or exhausted, my eczema is GONE for the first time in 25 years.  And the weirdest thing?  I had dark patches of skin on my knees, 2 on each knee in a pattern... 4 different Drs over 10 years and nobody had a diagnosis other than "it's just dark patches of skin". No cream, skin bleach, lemon treatment, alpha-hydroxy could get rid of it.  All but the darkest one that first appeared at the age of 12 is GONE, and even the dark one is about 75% lighter.  It's like a miracle to me!

 

Anyway, the allergist tested my antibodies for Celiac AFTER he told me to go gluten free.  I would NOT go back to gluten if you paid me.  The test came back as a weak positive and he said to see a gastro for an endoscopy.  I then went ahead and ordered a gene test and found that I carry the celiac gene on side (probably my dads no doubt) and a gene that tends to cause gluten intolerance on the other side.

 

I am gluten free now for 3 months and so much better.  I know I had some antibodies even after being gluten free (but not enough to be called positive).  I already have an auto immune disease.  Should I go through with the endoscopy?  I feel odd saying "I have Celiac" when I haven't had a medical diagnosis, but do I really need one?  I know "they" say the only real way for an official diagnosis is through an endoscopy, but...

 

What are your opinions on this?  I appreciate everyone's time and knowledge and hope to become part of this community. :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

If you have been gluten free, an endo won't diagnosis you with Celiac. You need to be eating gluten, making antibodies and destroying your intestines to get a positive biopsy.

SusanB26 Newbie

I have read it takes a long time for damage to heal after years of symptoms, and that 3 months is still enough time to be gluten free and get an endoscopy diagnosis?

kareng Grand Master

I have read it takes a long time for damage to heal after years of symptoms, and that 3 months is still enough time to be gluten free and get an endoscopy diagnosis?

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

mamaw Community Regular

please  believe  Kareng  on this one...

SusanB26 Newbie

I believe!!  LOL  That's why I came here to post this question.  I want real life expertise and opinions, not a Drs.  I was put through the ringer by Drs over the years with my thyroid.  That's a long story too, but I've come to be my own advocate, making educated decisions not just listening to docs.

 

So what would you do?  Live life as a Celiac, say you have Celiac (since the odds are against me anyway, that's most likely what it is just need one more test to totally confrim) and just go on with life?  Or would you eat gluten, feel absolutely horrible and then get an endoscopy?

 

Do any of you feel the need to have the diagnosis "validated"?  Is there any true benefit to it?

 

I am strict gluten free and feel perfectly fine again for the most part.  When I feel bad I'll get achy/tired and/or gasto issues and I'm usually able to trace it back to something that may have been cross-contaminated or had onion/garlic in it (which is harder than the gluten to be honest... any food that just says "spice" I can't eat without emailing the company).  A few days will go by and I feel better again.

 

Thank you!

Ikgbrd Apprentice

I'm experiencing the same problem as you. My doctors said to go gluten free, and after a month in they told me to go back on it for testing. There's no way I'm doing it either, I'm still not feeling completely better yet but my progress is still pretty good.

I decided to get the endoscopy anyway. Whether or not I get an accurate celiac diagnosis, the end result is the same, no more gluten. And maybe they'll spot some other problems as well, because my digestive tract is quite obviously still having problems. I'd say definitely do the test, worse case scenario is that it'll be inconclusive, but you could still possibly get some answers.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



notme Experienced

my opinion is:  a weak positive is still positive.  false negatives are common, false positives are not so much.  personally, you couldn't pay me enough $$$ to eat gluten every day for 3 weeks (when you already have your answer)  - i mean, unless you need it for legal/insurance reasons or whatnot.  and even then.................  not worth it to me  :)

notme Experienced

I'm experiencing the same problem as you. My doctors said to go gluten free, and after a month in they told me to go back on it for testing. There's no way I'm doing it either, I'm still not feeling completely better yet but my progress is still pretty good.

I decided to get the endoscopy anyway. Whether or not I get an accurate celiac diagnosis, the end result is the same, no more gluten. And maybe they'll spot some other problems as well, because my digestive tract is quite obviously still having problems. I'd say definitely do the test, worse case scenario is that it'll be inconclusive, but you could still possibly get some answers.

right.  i didn't go back on it for my scope, either, and we were mainly interested in ruling out other problems.  when she took a look she could actually see the damage indicative of celiac.  therefore, combined with response to the diet, she declared me celiac.  whoop de doo  ;)  lolz - still means the same thing:  no gluten = feel better all over  :)

1desperateladysaved Proficient

I am glad you are having improvements after gluten free!  I didn't have an endoscopy.  I had obvious bloating (5 months pregnant maybe?),

A really positive genetic test, positive response to diet, and a doctor who had respect for and listens to  her patients.  Since my diagnosis, I have been found to have mal-absorption, food intolerances to nearly everything I was eating, and tenderness of the small intestine.  I have also had a repeat nutrient absorption test in which my body was shown to be absorbing better!  I won't eat gluten again.  I feel good about the testing I have had and confident that no endoscopy would have changed my current treatment plan.  For me, it wasn't worth the gluten challenge, for sure.  However, each one can make the decision about what is right for them.

 

No thanks to destroying intestines; I spent 30+ years doing that and now I am better.

nvsmom Community Regular

I agree that a weak positive is still a positive, especially if you ad been gluten-free for a time prior to testing. Those celiac tests are pretty specific to celiac (meaning it's not likely that a positive test is caused by another condition).  Tis report, on page 12, shows how specific and sensitive each of the celiac tests are: Open Original Shared Link

 

I skipped the biopsy too. I was prtty sure my symptoms were caused by celiac after I had a positive blood test. I figured that if there were other issues, then I might as well wait to do an endoscopy and let the celiac damage heal before they had a look.

 

You might want to request some nutrient testing though. Celiacs are often low in potassium, iron, ferritin, D, B12, calcium, zinc and folate.

 

Welcome to the boards and best wishes in whatever you decide to do.

txgal748 Apprentice

I never went through an endoscopy.  My celiac panel was through the roof, so when I went to see the gastroenterologist he just ordered the DNA test. So, it is possible that you have had some healing over the past few months that would show a weak positive.  I was fine with not having the endoscopy because I know I feel much better.

  • 1 month later...
SusanB26 Newbie

Thank you to everyone who responded.  I chose not to have the endoscopy/biopsy.  I feel somuch better being gluten free I can't begin to imagine my life back on it.  I had heartburn/reflux that I thought I might want to get the endoscopy for, but now that too is simply gone.  I am living life as a Celiac and now use the term freely and comfortably.  The more research I did the more I realized you don't need a biopsy to confirm it.  Between family history, my own autoimmune issues, the gene test, and the presence of the anitbodies, I think I have my answer.

AlwaysLearning Collaborator

I passed on having an endoscopy run and my new gastroenterologist hasn't pressured me to get one. He says that if I am reacting to gluten, then I really shouldn't be consuming it. And though I'm a little curious as to how much damage may have been done, in a way, I don't really want to know. I know that much of it has already healed.

Plus, from what I've read, the chances of false negatives are pretty high (unless you have a doctor that understands celiac) so getting the test could just as easily result in a false negative.

I do have hope for the future though. There is talk of new tests that could require a much shorter retox period of days rather than weeks, or that rely on newly-discovered markers in the blood rather than the invasive endoscopy procedure that has to be done in a hospital.

I'm with you. The thought of retoxing now is so horrifying to me that I may never get tested. I also don't feel the need to have confirmed what my body has already told me. If other's don't understand my new diet regime, that is their problem. Often it is fellow family members who are the least likely to believe you - most likely because that would mean that they need to take it seriously too. If they can't understand the ramifications of the genetic testing that you've already had done, then there is a good chance they also won't be willing to go gluten free even if they should.

If I do need to get a diagnosis confirmed in triplicate for some reason down the road, I just hope it is far enough in the future that the science and medical practices are a lot better than what we have available to us today.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    4. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,331
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kristy2026
    Newest Member
    Kristy2026
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.