Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

All Or Nothing?


JenM

Recommended Posts

JenM Apprentice

I have ataxia, and I was tested for Celiac through Prometheus labs. The tests came back negative, but I still wonder if a gluten-free diet might help me with my shaking and balance, and the swishing sound that I have in my left ear. Would cutting back on glutenous foods be helpful, or would I need to be strict about a completely gluten-free diet? Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Carriefaith Enthusiast

I would go 100% gluten free. Any amount of gluten would probably cause damage and prevent you from getting better.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Definitely go 100% gluten free as if you had celiac.

frenchiemama Collaborator

I agree. 100% gluten-free.

celiac3270 Collaborator

If you get "glutened" once a month, it's the equivalent of not following the diet at all--you need to go all in.

Lisa Mentor

100%

JenM Apprentice

Thanks for all your help and input. I'm thinking that since the bloodwork was negative for Celiac, maybe I have just a sensitivity. Does the advice to go 100% gluten-free still apply?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast
Thanks for all your help and input.  I'm thinking that since the bloodwork was negative for Celiac, maybe I have just a sensitivity.  Does the advice to go 100% gluten-free still apply?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Yes, because if you have a gluten sensitivity and continue to eat gluten it can turn into celiac.

JenM Apprentice
Yes, because if you have a gluten sensitivity and continue to eat gluten it can turn into celiac.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

:o Thanks, Kaiti. I didn't know that.

MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

Where did you learn that, Kaiti? It doesn't make sense.

The only way to stop problems caused by gluten is to be 100% gluten-free.

skbird Contributor

You can be gluten intolerant and not have Celiac but have other autoimmune diseases occur as well - if gluten is damaging to your system, then you need to not consume it. Celiac is bad but it's not the only bad thing out there. Even gluten intolerance of the generic sort is bad enough. If you have ataxia and there is a chance it is related to gluten, you may be able to reverse some of the damage by going gluten free 100%.

Another thing you should look into is supplementing with B12. Sublingual tablets have been proven to be just as effective as injections in most cases.

Take care

Stephanie

Carriefaith Enthusiast

To prevent your ataxia from getting worse you must be 100% gluten free. The gluten free diet is intimidating at first, but it gets easier with time. If you need meal ideas, please ask! :)

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
Where did you learn that, Kaiti?  It doesn't make sense.

The only way to stop problems caused by gluten is to be 100% gluten-free.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

My doctor (very knowledgeable in celiac disease) and I were talking about celiac...I scheduled and appointment just so I could talk to him about info because of some things I am working on. Anyways, he told me that if you are intolerant to gluten and your body is bothered when you eat it but you continue to eat it then it can turn into celiac(if you have one of the genes). When you feed your body something it does not agree with then you slowly tear your system down. He said your body basically says "Enough, I can't take this anymore" and starts to do the damage.

That's just what I was told...makes sense to me.

I know there has been debate of if gluten intolerance can turn into celiac especially without genetic predisposition and I personally think it is possible if the diet is just ignored.

Carriefaith Enthusiast

That description makes sense, especially if the person has the gene for celiac.

MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

While it makes a little sense but not really, I am more on the line that without the gene it cannot turn into Celiacs. People who don't have the gene can't be considered having this disease. I do think it is very unhealthy to consume gluten if it does damage to you, Celiac or not, and would further harm your body but as of the research yet I don't think it would develop into Celiacs Disease.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
While it makes a little sense but not really, I am more on the line that without the gene it cannot turn into Celiacs.  People who don't have the gene can't be considered having this disease.  I do think it is very unhealthy to consume gluten if it does damage to you, Celiac or not, and would further harm your body but as of the research yet I don't think it would develop into Celiacs Disease.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It would be very likely to turn to celiac if you have the gene though.

Maybe thats something worth looking into for the original poster to see if she is predisposed to it because most people do have one of the main genes.

However, I would be very interested in knowing if there are diagnosed celiacs without the gene.

Carriefaith Enthusiast
However, I would be very interested in knowing if there are diagnosed celiacs without the gene.
same here
MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

I do remember people, or one person, posting here after doing the test for the genes and saying since they did not have the gene they did not have Celiacs so they are just gluten intolerant.

skbird Contributor

Rachel-24 does not have the Celiac gene but had high antibodies and malabsorption. I don't know the result of her endoscopy but she has DQ1 and from her test results sounds Celiac.

Then again there is info coming out that DQ1 might soon be considered a Celiac gene. There is also info that some 1% of Celiacs don't have either of the two accepted genes (DQ2 and 8).

Stephanie

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
Rachel-24 does not have the Celiac gene but had high antibodies and malabsorption. I don't know the result of her endoscopy but she has DQ1 and from her test results sounds Celiac.

Then again there is info coming out that DQ1 might soon be considered a Celiac gene. There is also info that some 1% of Celiacs don't have either of the two accepted genes (DQ2 and 8).

Stephanie

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Yea about 1% have the DQ1 gene I believe I heard...so a strong majority have one of the 2 main genes but a very small portion do not.

Carriefaith Enthusiast

Actually, I just remembered that there will be new research being done on genes and celiac disease in England. They are offering research for potential phd students. "Over 500,000 genetic markers will be genotyped in each of several thousand individuals using array based technology." Open Original Shared Link

celiac3270 Collaborator

I've talked to a number of doctors about gluten intolerance, though, and they have all told me (including Dr. Levy at the Celiac Center at Columbia) that gluten intolerance is like lactose intolerance in that you can consume whatever you can tolerate--for some that may be almost none, for others it might be a little bit. And gluten intolerance disregarded won't lead to full-blown celiac, just as lactose intolerance disregarded won't lead to a full-blown milk allergy--you may feel bad, but nothing damaging will actually take place.

skoki-mom Explorer
I've talked to a number of doctors about gluten intolerance, though, and they have all told me (including Dr. Levy at the Celiac Center at Columbia) that gluten intolerance is like lactose intolerance in that you can consume whatever you can tolerate--for some that may be almost none, for others it might be a little bit.  And gluten intolerance disregarded won't lead to full-blown celiac, just as lactose intolerance disregarded won't lead to a full-blown milk allergy--you may feel bad, but nothing damaging will actually take place.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

This is the sort of thing my nurse's brain has been telling me as well. It just doesn't make sense that an intoerance can turn into celiac disease. That to me sounds like saying if you eat too much sugar you will get diabetes (my mother used to tell me that as a child!). However, I am certainly no expert on this, but the explanation your doctors gave you does make more sense to me.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
I've talked to a number of doctors about gluten intolerance, though, and they have all told me (including Dr. Levy at the Celiac Center at Columbia) that gluten intolerance is like lactose intolerance in that you can consume whatever you can tolerate--for some that may be almost none, for others it might be a little bit.  And gluten intolerance disregarded won't lead to full-blown celiac, just as lactose intolerance disregarded won't lead to a full-blown milk allergy--you may feel bad, but nothing damaging will actually take place.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I don't know which one is true but I have heard some of each. My doctor has told me that genetically predisposed people can develop celiac if they have a sensitivity but ignore it...then I see what your doctors have told you so it's quite difficult to know what is true.

If someone is already predisposed to celiac though I would think it could turn into celiac if they are experiencing symptoms when eating gluten and ignoring it.

They say the main genes are DQ2 and DQ8 however that is only for about 98% of the people.Not all 100% of celiacs have those genes and are confirmed celiacs.

I know Rachel-24 had her results come back with malabsorption and damage..however, she does not have one of the main celiac genes...she could be one of the small # of people that have celiac without one of the major genes.

Or can just gluten intolerance cause damage? Now that would not make sense because the defining point in celiac is the damage that it does.

Now, if a gene test comes back negative then it is not likely it can ever become celiac because there is a link with the genetics but that can not be 100% accurate since a very tiny majority do not have either gene. Unless there is another main celiac gene that they need to be testing for..I believe the small majority that have neither of the main genes have the DQ1 gene...so why isn't that being tested for as a celiac gene.

It doesn't make sense that making yourself feel bad over and over would not lead to some more serious problems. I don't buy it when people say o it just makes me feel bad but nothing else will happen...I think something worse will happen if you ignore your body...that's just my opinion though.

Guest nini

Kaiti, as always, I 100% agree with what you are saying.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - xxnonamexx posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

    2. - cristiana replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

    3. - trents replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Aretaeus Cappadocia's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

    5. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      nothing has changed

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,190
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Atl222
    Newest Member
    Atl222
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      Please read: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-steps-improve-gluten-ingredient-disclosure-foods?fbclid=IwY2xjawPeXhJleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFzaDc3NWRaYzlJOFJ4R0Fic3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHrwuSsw8Be7VNGOrKKWFVbrjmf59SGht05nIALwnjQ0DoGkDDK1doRBDzeeX_aem_GZcRcbhisMTyFUp3YMUU9Q
    • cristiana
      Hi @Atl222 As @trents points out, there could be many reasons for this biopsy result.  I am interested to know, is your gastroenterologist concerned?  Also, are your blood tests showing steady improvement over the years? I remember when I had my last biopsy, several years after diagnosis, mine came back with with raised lymphocytes but no villous damage, too! In my own case, my consultant wasn't remotely concerned - in fact, he said I might still get this result even if all I ever did was eat nothing but rice and water.   My coeliac blood tests were still steadily improving, albeit slowly, which was reassuring.
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease or gluten/oats exposure. See attachment. But you might try eliminating oats to start with and possibly dairy for a few months and then seek another endoscopy/biopsy to see if there was a reduction in lymphocyte counts. 
    • Scott Adams
      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especially since Eden has a long-standing reputation for transparency. While the lack of gluten labeling can understandably give pause, manufacturer confirmation like this is often what people rely on for traditionally fermented products. As always, trusting your body after trying it is reasonable, but based on the information you gathered, your conclusion makes sense.
    • Scott Adams
      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can take 12–24 months (sometimes longer) for antibodies and the intestinal lining to fully heal, particularly in teens and young adults. Eating gluten again to “test” things isn’t recommended and won’t give you clear answers—it’s far more likely to cause harm than clarity. Weight not changing is also very common in celiac and doesn’t rule anything out. Please know that your frustration and sadness matter; this adjustment is hard, and feeling stuck can really affect mental health. You deserve support, and if you can, reaching out to a GI dietitian or mental health professional familiar with chronic illness could really help you through this phase. This study indicates that a majority of celiacs don't recover until 5 years after diagnosis and starting a gluten-free diet: Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet However, it's also possible that what the study really shows is the difficulty in maintaining a 100% gluten-free diet. I suspect that if you looked closely at the diets of those who did not recover within 2 years might be that their diets were not 100% gluten-free. Perhaps they ate out more often, or didn't understand all of the hidden ingredients where gluten can hide. Either way, it shows how difficult recovery from celiac disease can be for most people. According to this study: This article explores other causes of flattened villi:    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.