Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Tests Came Back Negative


Soccer-Mom2405

Recommended Posts

Soccer-Mom2405 Newbie

I had blood tests done last week and the results were made available to me Monday.  Doc said the tests were negative but genes were present and referred me to a GI for follow-up. 

 

Here's a little background.  I was diagnosed with IBS years ago and told to stay away from leafy green veggies, chocolate, carbonated drinks, and so on.  I didn't listen just dealt with the usual side effects.  A year ago, I had a cousin diagnosed with Celiac and began researching to help her mom.  I was shocked to see the similarities between to two.  All of my symptoms were the same as celiac symptoms.  I've joked ever since about being tested but never have.  After a month of low carb eating with no symptoms, I decided to return to eating what I had previously considered normally to have the tests done.  Everywhere I read stated to not change your eating habits before being tested.  I informed the doctor that I had been eating low carb and asked how long I should eat normal before being tested.  He said because I didn't completely eliminate gluten that I would be fine to have the tests now.  I waited a week be the effects became almost too bearable.

 

For years, I have lived with:

     Bloating, flatulence, stomach cramps (sometimes very severe), diarrhea, constipation, fatigue, brain fog, noises from my abdomen after eating (embarrassingly loud), insomnia

 

Symptoms I wrote down after returning to eating “normal”:

     Mouth sores, acne, restless leg syndrome, joint achy, irritability

 

Here are the tests results:

 

Name

 

Value

 

Reference Range

         

Gliadin(Deamidated) IgA

 

<10.0

 

<20.0 (Negative) unit(s)

Gliadin(Deamidated) IgG

 

<10.0

 

<20.0 (Negative) unit(s)

TTG IgA

 

<1.2

 

<4.0 (Negative) U/mL

TTG IgG

 

1.3

 

<6.0 (Negative) U/mL

Celiac DQ Alpha 1

 

05:01,05

 

Not Applicable

Celiac DQ Beta 1

 

02:01,02:01

 

Not Applicable

Celiac Gene Pairs?

 

Yes

             

 

Not sure exactly what this means other than, I see negative by most of the results.  His comments were "The blood tests were negative but genes were present.  Would see a GI for further advice".


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



0range Apprentice

I have IBS, too! Is it possible you are having a false negative result? A biopsy would be worth pursuing in that case. Ts there anyone else in your family with celiac disease? The possibility of non-celiac gluten sensitivity is also a reality.

I'm also getting tested for IBD as the symptoms overlap with celiac.

notme Experienced

mostly everybody on here was 'diagnosed' with ibs - which stands for 'irritable bowel syndrome' which means something is irritating your bowel but they have no idea what it is.  

 

false negatives on the blood test are pretty common.  guaging your response to gluten-free diet is one of the tools doctors use to diagnose celiac/ncgi <but if you are either of these things you will have to be gluten-free.  no cheatsies  ;)

Soccer-Mom2405 Newbie

I am following up with a GI next Thursday. 

 

The only family member that has been officially diagnosed is a cousin about a year ago.  My mother had many stomach issues accompanied with many surgeries.  She was a diabetic, asthamtic, and a breast cancer survivor who battled many stomach issues from vomitting to diarreha daily.  She passed 7 years ago at the age of 58 and I've wondered if she had celiac.  My grandmother passed this year after being diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer.  Same as my mother, she battled stomach issues as long as I can remember.  Looking back after reading so much concerning celiac, it just makes me wonder if celiac could be tied to thier issues.

Lock Newbie

The same thing happened to me. I went on a "no carb" diet for about four months, and got the blood test. It is negative but my genetic test put me in the highest risk category for celiac disease and my EnteroLab stool tests are positive. I almost feel like the blood test was a waste of time.

Soccer-Mom2405 Newbie

I'm not sure what tests, if any, the GI will perform or request. 

 

From the research I've done on the internet along with this site, I feel I do have at the minimum an intolerance.  It just amazed me the difference in my gastro when I ate low carb.  I did find that if I injested too many sugar alcohols (the low carb/sugar free candies and bars) my symptoms would come back just not as severe. I can handle this but it does scare to think my son may be going down this same road.  His issuesare  the same as mine just not as bad right now.

kareng Grand Master

I'm not sure what tests, if any, the GI will perform or request. 

 

From the research I've done on the internet along with this site, I feel I do have at the minimum an intolerance.  It just amazed me the difference in my gastro when I ate low carb.  I did find that if I injested too many sugar alcohols (the low carb/sugar free candies and bars) my symptoms would come back just not as severe. I can handle this but it does scare to think my son may be going down this same road.  His issuesare  the same as mine just not as bad right now.

 

 

The sugar alcohols are a problem for lots of people - even those without Celiac.

 

Remember, for any Celiac testing, you must be eating gluten for a few weeks to get a positive result.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,160
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Greymo
    Newest Member
    Greymo
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.