Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Elisa Igg Results- Looking For Insight


Chitowngirl

Recommended Posts

Chitowngirl Newbie

I've been gluten free for over a year. I just received results back from my Alletess ELISA IgG test that I did a few weeks ago. So, right now the only gluten allergy/sensitivity coming up is Rye. I haven't had products containing rye or rye bread in years. I'm also allergic/sensitive to baker's yeast, which is another product that I rarely ingest. Both wheat and flour were 'normal'. This is the first food allergy testing that I've had done. I've been told to take the results somewhat with a grain of salt due to the leaky gut that I'm still trying to heal, but I'm still considering it n revealing and insightful because I haven't had gluten in a long time, so I'm wondering why would rye be the only gluten coming up, if it's the same gluten. I carry the rarest of genes associated with celiac and have never tested positive on the antibody tests. I have two other known AI diseases. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



1desperateladysaved Proficient

When I had my test, I was told that if I hadn't taken in gluten or other test food for a long while that it would false negative.  To prepare for the test I tried to take in each of the 60 test items at least once and hopefully twice in the two weeks before the blood was drawn.  I already knew that I had problems with wheat and would not eat that.  You need to be exposed to wheat in order to have antibodies to it. 

 

Did you have low level antibodies to other foods, or did you have 0's?  I showed leaky gut and that caused me to have low level antibodies to 49 of 60 foods.  I did have foods test positive I hadn't eaten.  I was told that some foods are in the same families, so it can test positive when you haven't eaten it.  Sometimes too, you may not realize that your food contains another food.  Like I tested positive for coffee, but am not a coffee drinker.  I think it may be in the carob powder as the same factory grinds and packages it.

 

Do you know if your total IgG is normal?

 

My test helped me a lot.  I stopped eating the foods I had antibodies too and started feeling better 4 days later.  I hope all of the same for you.  I know it can be quite tricky to find foods, but I found it possible and am glad for it.

 

I am not sure what you mean by rare genetics.  My genetics are DQ2 and DQ8 and I tested positive with low antibodies to wheat although I had not eat any on purpose recently.

 

D

IrishHeart Veteran

According to those test kit sites, antibodies are high when you are consuming a food, so if you do not have any showing for wheat, it is because you have been "gluten Free".

So, unless you have been eating rye bread, you should not show high antibodies to the food.

That's assuming these tests are valid.

 

I do not know how to say this but "food intolerance testing" is not considered valid for diagnosing "food intolerances".

Yes, I know many holistic doctors and chiropractors use them, but that does not make them valid.

 

I know  so many people pay tons of money for these tests (and I was one of them long before I knew what I know now and before my celiac diagnosis. Mine did not show any problem with wheat, rye or barley, so take that for what it's worth. <_< )

 

However, the truth is they are not clinically relevant.

I cannot tell you how many people have told me they test positive for foods they do not even eat!!

This makes no sense,

How is this possible---since high antibodies should only be present if there is continual consumption of the food protein?

 

From the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology & American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology: Open Original Shared Link:

IgG and IgG subclass antibody tests for food allergy do not have clinical relevance, are not validated, lack sufficient quality control, and should not be performed.

 

 

also:

 

From the Open Original Shared LinkIgG Testing: This test checks your blood for the presence of food-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. Unlike IgE antibodies, which occur in abnormally large quantities in people with allergies, IgG antibodies are found in both allergic and non-allergic people. Experts believe that the production of IgG antibodies is a normal response to eating food and that this test is not helpful in diagnosing a food allergy.

 

READ this, please

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

If you want to read the science behind this:

Open Original Shared Link

 

No celiac disease center finds them relevant either. Sorry.

kareng Grand Master

Sorry.  Those don't test for Celiac or much of anything.  They may get lucky and hit a few.  There may be a placebo effect of eliminating foods.

 

 

Open Original Shared Link

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    3. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,077
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.