Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Thoughts On This Statement


cmc811

Recommended Posts

cmc811 Apprentice

Type 1 lesions, with IEL only, can be seen in IBS and other causes of malabsorption.  If a patient has a Marsh Type 1 lesion in the duodenum and positive TTG antibodies, the diagnosis is either Celiac Disease or Crohn’s Disease.  If anti-endomysial antibodies are present, it is Celiac Disease, and if they are absent, it is Crohn’s Disease.

 

I stumbled across this statement today on Open Original Shared Link and I wanted some thoughts. Obviously that is a very black and white statement and understanding Celiac never seems to be that clear.

 

I'm particularly interested in what Marsh 1 with positive ttg means because that is exactly where I'm at. Unfortunately the EMA was never ordered and I have now been gluten free for 9 days. I haven't had a follow up appt with my GI yet, I just was told that my biopsy wasn't the typical findings of celiac. Her advice was that if I feel better off gluten, I should continue to avoid it. It seemed like she was just leaving it at that because she never mentioned following up at all.

 

So...........if a positive ttg and Marsh 1 doesn't always mean Celiac, then what? Shouldn't she be ruling out other causes? Those 2 findings aren't "normal" and something is causing them. To be honest I know very little about Crohn's disease but it has never been mentioned as a possibility when discussing my symptoms with my PCP or GI.

 

I just wish it really was as black and white as the quoted statement makes it seem...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



LauraTX Rising Star

This article, the second column on the first page... gives a good layout of the number grading of lesions.
Open Original Shared Link
 
Whoever gave this statement misspoke in the second sentence.  But the third sentence clarifies.  If antibodies are present, it is celiac.  If not, it is crohn's.
 
It really should read: If a patient has a Marsh Type 1 lesion in the duodenum, the diagnosis is either Celiac Disease or Crohn’s Disease.  If anti-endomysial antibodies are present, it is Celiac Disease, and if they are absent, it is Crohn’s Disease.

 

Maybe we should contact them to let them know of the error.  I am going to email the blogger.

 

Edit to add:  It looks like it was probably her error as she was transcribing events of the day to her blog.  I sent her an email contact.

jebby Enthusiast

Hi CMC and Laura,

Laura did email me and I am very grateful that she did, and I am sorry about any confusion.

Dr. Marsh, the founder of the a Marsh grading system for the small intestinal changes seen in celiac disease, gave a talk at the ICDS, and he is the one who I paraphrased in my blog post.

From what Dr. Marsh said during the lecture, if a patient has symptoms, elevated TTG antibodies, and a Marsh 1 lesion, there are 2 possibilities, either Celiac Disease (likely an early stage) or Crohn's Disease. The other causes of a Marsh 1 lesion, such as IBS or lactose intolerance, do not cause the TTG antibodies to be elevated.

To determine if the symptoms, elevated TTG, and Marsh 1 lesion is from Celiac v. Crohn's, the endomysial antibodies should be checked. If the endomysial antibodies are normal, the patient likely has Crohn's, as they should be elevated in Celiac Disease.

Nothing in medicine is ever black and white, but I believe that he was trying to provide a framework/guidelines for medical decision making for some of these gray areas of celiac diagnosis.

Thank you also for reading my post in the first place, as poor Laura learned from my email I am really at a low point with blogging and updating it right now....

Jess

cmc811 Apprentice
  On 3/20/2014 at 3:34 AM, jebby said:

Hi CMC and Laura,

Laura did email me and I am very grateful that she did, and I am sorry about any confusion.

Dr. Marsh, the founder of the a Marsh grading system for the small intestinal changes seen in celiac disease, gave a talk at the ICDS, and he is the one who I paraphrased in my blog post.

From what Dr. Marsh said during the lecture, if a patient has symptoms, elevated TTG antibodies, and a Marsh 1 lesion, there are 2 possibilities, either Celiac Disease (likely an early stage) or Crohn's Disease. The other causes of a Marsh 1 lesion, such as IBS or lactose intolerance, do not cause the TTG antibodies to be elevated.

To determine if the symptoms, elevated TTG, and Marsh 1 lesion is from Celiac v. Crohn's, the endomysial antibodies should be checked. If the endomysial antibodies are normal, the patient likely has Crohn's, as they should be elevated in Celiac Disease.

Nothing in medicine is ever black and white, but I believe that he was trying to provide a framework/guidelines for medical decision making for some of these gray areas of celiac diagnosis.

Thank you also for reading my post in the first place, as poor Laura learned from my email I am really at a low point with blogging and updating it right now....

Jess

Thank you so much for the clarification!!!

 

It doesn't help my particular situation because EMA was never ordered for me but my GI said it was very likely Celiac and was confident enough to call it that. I guess now I just worry that the diagnosis wasn't right. Is seeing how I feel on the diet the next step? My tTg was just mildly elevated (7 with >4 being positive) and with my biopsy only showing Marsh I it makes me less confident about the diagnosis I guess.

Unrelated but I just got my endoscopy report in the mail and I'm a bit disapointed. Only says "multiple biopsies" but doesn't say how many or if any were taken from the bulb. Just says "duodenum". And the pathology report isn't helpful either. It states "The specimen consists of multiple tan-gray tissue fragment(s) measuring up to 0.5cm. The specimen is entirely submitted between sponges in one cassette."

 

I thought I read somewhere that the tissue taken from each biopsy was supposed to be submitted separately, but of course I can't find that article now so I have no idea the source. Also it just says "increased number of intraepithelial lymphocytes" but there isn't a number. Is that normal?

 

I have been given the diagnosis and I have no problem with being gluten-free but I just want to be confident about it and unfortunately I'm just as unsure now as before my endoscopy :(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,980
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    mary lou grolimond olson
    Newest Member
    mary lou grolimond olson
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      It sounds like your gastroenterologist is becoming increasingly confident that celiac disease is the likely diagnosis based on both your older and newer lab results. Her suggestion to call each Monday for possible cancellations is actually a great strategy—especially given how long the wait is until your August 29th appointment. It’s also a good sign that she’s advocating for you to be seen sooner, which shows she’s taking your case seriously. The fact that some labs might not have been drawn yet due to overlap with your functional health doctor’s upcoming testing adds a layer of confusion, but that’s unfortunately common when multiple providers are involved. Hopefully, the GI’s...
    • cristiana
      Thanks for sharing that film, @trents.  I am not sure how I missed that film as I see it is a few years old, but it is very good.  I think you should be fine if you take your own packed lunch and eat it from your own lunchbox etc.  Might be worth doing a lunchtime recce to see how cramped the room is before making a decision - for all you know, there may be other people  there who don't eat gluten?
    • cameo674
      The GI doc messaged me this afternoon that she believes that the new blood work added to the old is definitely  looking like a celiac diagnosis is in my future.  She wants to me to call into scheduling each Monday to see if I can get my August 29th appointment moved up due to cancellations.  I have never had a doctor recommend that.  She also said there were additional labs that she requested still out that have not come back yet; so, they may have been missed drawing those since the functional health doctor has a whole slew of labs that I am suppose to be waiting until August 27th to do. I am still waiting to hear on whether or not she will allow me to do pill prep versus the typical...
    • Alibu
      Well, I've made if from the pre-diagnosis forum to here!  I've been diagnosed with "latent" or "potential" celiac and my doctor has suggested me to go gluten-free before my appointment with him in October (first available, LOL).  My ttg-iga was 152, my EMA was positive, I have the gene, but my biopsy was negative (and he took 12 samples), so it makes sense to go gluten free to see if I improve. I know the basics - I can find lists of things to avoid, I know about hidden dangers, etc. all of that.  Where I'm struggling is just STARTING.  I need to go shopping and stock up on some staples.  My goal is to not try to find gluten-free alternatives, but to focus on naturally gluten-free foods like...
    • Scott Adams
      It’s great that you were finally able to see a gastroenterologist—and even luckier to get in the same day as your referral! It sounds like your GI is taking a very thorough approach, which is reassuring given your complex symptoms and history. The confusion around your different tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody results is understandable. The variation between your December and June labs may be due to multiple factors, including differences in the lab performing the test (Quest vs. Mayo Clinic), the specific assay used, and the amount of gluten you had been consuming before each test. Antibody levels can drop significantly when gluten is reduced or eliminated from the...
×
×
  • Create New...