Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac?

Michelle1

Recommended Posts

Michelle1 Rookie
Michelle1
Posted

Hi there I'm looking for some opinions here. I'm 34 had my first child 2.5 years ago and recently was tested for celiac. I'm now waiting to see a gastroenterologist. My results are as follows:

tTG AB, IgA 18 (normal <4)

Endomysial AB IgA positive

Endomysial AB titer 1:20 (negative 1:5)

IgA serum 185 (range 81-463)

Since I was a child I've had constipation and as an adult go from constipation to diarrhea. Mild anemia, hypothyroid, low vitamin D. I've also been extremely overweight my whole life and though I've been able to lose some weight off and on, since having my baby girl I've tried EVERYTHING and can't seem to lose more than 6 pounds. My mom suggested I get tested when I was complaining of a skin rash around my neck that I got from being in the sun (last year it happened also and was told by a PA that it was a sun allergy that I never had before and it's so extremely itchy and looks like a cross of hives and ringworm. When I asked her to test me she said no you don't have that but then I convinced a doctor friend to order the test.).

Anyway, it looks like I may have celiac? So I went gluten free for two days before the gastro office said not to change my eating until the appointment there so went back to eating it. In those two days I felt pretty good, my aches and pains were lessening I lost 4 pounds etc...so I'm wondering if I even need to go through the gastro appointment? Is a biopsy necessary to really confirm the diagnosis? Are my lab results possibly borderline or "mild"? I'm asking because I've read about people being positive but having fine biopsies and am just curious and also looking to educate myself more on the topic.

I've also scheduled my daughter an appointment with her doctor as she is constipated a lot but she also doesn't like veggies and few fruits, and she is really slim. Her Dr has always attributed it to her being 1/2 Indian and my husband is so slim also but I wonder as she doesn't register on the growth chart but otherwise acts perfectly healthy.

Any advice or insight would be greatly appreciated...

Slightly confused Michelle

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

I would get the biopsy. It will help confirm a diagnosis and create a reference point for future testing. I was just barely positive on my blood test, but had moderate to severe damage. An endoscopy can detect other issues like an ulcer, etc. Plus, it may convince others in your family to get tested.. Not all celiacs have GI issues. I did not!

I know you felt better in just two days, but it is hard to stay on the wagon if you ever have any doubts about your diagnosis.

Keep eating gluten until you complete all testing.

Welcome and keep us posted. Have some fresh sourdough bread for me!

NoGlutenCooties Contributor
NoGlutenCooties
Posted

Hi Michelle and Welcome!

 

With a ttg iga of 18, it is highly likely you have Celiac.  Get the biopsy to confirm though.  Keep in mind that it is possible to have a negative biopsy result and still have Celiac - the testing isn't perfect.  But they will check for other possible issues, so the test is definitely worth getting.

 

FWIW... my ttg iga was "only" 13, on a scale that considered anything over 11 as positive.  I had no symptoms at all and only got tested because Celiac runs in my family.  My biopsy showed moderate to severe villi damage.

Michelle1 Rookie
Michelle1
Posted
  • Author

Oh wow thanks for the info. My sister and her son are going to get tested also now but my dad who has anemia and diabetes said he'll do the bloodiest only...he's 70 so there's not much that will change his mind I'm afraid. Happy Easter to you all and thank you!

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

If the biopsy will help you stay gluten-free, and take eating gluten-free seriously, and you would like to know how damagaed your intestines are (for possible future reference) then I say get the biopsy done. If you are satisfied with a celiac disease diagnosis based on the tTG IgA and EMA IgA results, then I think you would do fine skipping the biopsy... I'm biased though. I had a positive tTG IgA and EMA IgA and chose to skip further diagnostic procedures because those too tests , combined, are about as sure of a positive celiac diagnosis a blood test can get.  

 

This report has more info on the tests: Open Original Shared Link

 

If you do end up with a negative biopsy (they can miss the damage) please go gluten-free in the end anyways.  With those two positive tests, celiac disease is pretty much a sure thing.

 

Welcome to the boards.  :)

Michelle1 Rookie
Michelle1
Posted
  • Author

Thanks for the link! I'm going to go gluten free, I feel like yuck since starting to eat it again and don't want to keep eating this way until my appointment but I will. (Though I was only off for 2days I can really tell from that how it makes me feel!)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,683
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Jean Tonkin
    Newest Member
    Jean Tonkin
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.