Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need Help Interpreting Iga Blood Test Results


kristin21

Recommended Posts

kristin21 Newbie

Hi everyone!

 

I've been gluten free for 3 years now, and I just had my IgG and IgA levels tested again because I still have a lot of bloating and distention despite eliminating gluten and some other foods 1 year ago that I found out I had intolerances too. And then 2 weeks ago, I eliminated a few other foods I discovered I had intolerances too (almond, refined sugar, etc.), and starting introducing some of the foods I had previously eliminated because of intolerances, but that blood work showed I was ok with now (poultry, eggs, etc.).

 

However, 3 years later, I'm still experiencing bloating and distention, although it has gotten better over the years. Like I said, I just had the antibody levels checked again, and everything has gone down, except IgA is still above 'normal'. Does this mean that I'm still ingesting gluten somehow? Or does it point to some other problem? Any help would be appreciated. I have posted my initial and new blood test results here.

 

Upon Diagnosis

Deamidated Gliadin IgA 70.3 U/mol

Deamidated Gliadin IgG 24.1 U/mol

Transglutaminase IgA AB 2.6 U/mol

(the reference range says these numbers should be below 12 U/mol)

 

New Results

Deamidated Gliadin IgA 21.2 U/mol

Deamidated Gliadin IgG 1.5 U/mol

Transglutaminase IgA AB 0.3 U/mol

(the reference range for this test shows that these should be below 9.99 U/mol)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board.

The DGP IgA is thought to be one of the better tests for monitoring compliance to the gluten-free diet. If it is positive, it is usually gluten causing it. I do not know what could cause a false positive in that test. :(

Could it be gluten? Is it possible that something was contaminated?

kristin21 Newbie

Welcome to the board.

The DGP IgA is thought to be one of the better tests for monitoring compliance to the gluten-free diet. If it is positive, it is usually gluten causing it. I do not know what could cause a false positive in that test. :(

Could it be gluten? Is it possible that something was contaminated?

Thanks for the reply. I had suspected that that's what it meant, but I just wanted to make sure. It's pretty disheartening to know that I'm still getting gluten after 3 years, cause I thought I was being so careful. Apparently not. 

 

I still live at home, and my mom eats gluten. So it must be a cross contamination issue, because I'm really careful with the foods that I buy. The only other thing would maybe be the birth control I'm on, or maybe vitamins, even though all the ones I take say that there's no gluten in them. Has anyone had any experience with Trophic brand and Health First brand vitamins? 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Definitely check the birth control pills.

nvsmom Community Regular

Once you've checked and tweaked your diet, meds, shampoos and such, I would ask for a DGP retest in 3 to 6 months to see if it does go down... Just in case it IS something else that is raising it up. There is a LOT I don't know about those tests, and that probably applies to many of the doctors too.

 

Good luck!  I hope you figure it out. :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.