Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

When/if To Introduce Gluten To Child When You Have Celiac


aCfm18

Recommended Posts

aCfm18 Newbie

I don't know if this was the right place to post this, butI have very severe Celiac Disease and have been strictly gluten free since I was diagnosed 4 years ago. I'm currently 26 weeks pregnant with my first child and I'm expecting a girl (girls are more likely to develop celiac, correct?) Obviously this is way down the line, but I'm curious about when and IF I should introduce gluten into her diet once she starts eating solid foods. I've read some very conflicting information. Some websites state that I should avoid gluten until she is older and some say to introduce it immediately. I have no experience on the subject, because I had no problem eating gluten my entire childhood and didn't start having Celiac-like symptoms until my late teens, when I was diagnosed almost immediately afterward. My biopsy looked very good considering, and doctors told me that I didn't actually develop Celiac until recently and was lucky enough to catch it at the beginning. Now however, if I am "glutened" I have HORRIBLE HORRIBLE symptoms, including vomiting, severe constipation, and I feel so all around sick I've passed out. I don't want this fate for my daughter. But I'm not so sure it's preventable either way. My mother has Celiac Disease as well. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



StephanieL Enthusiast

Dr. Fassino did research on this and I do believe it came down that it doesn't matter really. 

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

It's the second question in the article. There is a more detailed research paper on it by him but I just did a quick search

 

Here's another link:  Open Original Shared Link

cyclinglady Grand Master

I hear ha! At the time I was pregnant, I was undiagnosed, but had allergies to eggs, nuts and milk. My husband was gluten free based on the poor advice from my allergist and his GP. Oh, he is doing great, but a firm diagnosis would be great!

I avoided all my allergens while I was pregnant and nursing. My kid was super healthy. I did not feed her solids until she was eight months old and delayed gluten, eggs, nuts and milk until she was over a year per the advice of my allergist. Did it make a difference? Who knows? So far she is negative for celiac disease. Her PED always said that she one of his healthiest kids.

I read the same conflicting information. Your best bet is just to watch for symptoms and get her tested periodically. Our doc always checks her for anemia frequently since that was my only symptom at the time of my diagnosis. She is tested evey few years for celiac disease. In any case, she eats gluten-free in our house and I send her off with pre-packaged gluten things in her lunch. I make sure she gets some gluten daily.

Good luck and congratulations!

nvsmom Community Regular

Congratulations!  :)

 

When you introduce gluten will not affect whether she develops celiac disease but if she does develop celiac disease at a very young age, her babyhood could be sickly because celiac disease is harder to diagnose in the very young.  The blood tests don't always pick up on early celiac disease, and it is known that it is more difficult to catch celiac disease with blood tests in those under age 2.

 

If this is your first child, you will be able to have total control of her diet. I would personally consider holding off on introducing gluten until she is at least two.  Why risk it?  Gluten is not at all needed for a healthy diet, it is just a convenience food.  Instead of snacking on Cheerios she can have cut up fruit or veggies, or if you need convenience food, get her Chex.  There really is no reason for here to have gluten in her life.

 

When you do introduce her to it, Test her for celiac disease every two years, or as soon as symptoms develop, until she is out of the house.  I've seen stats saying a first degree relative has a 1 in 10 to a 1 in 22 chance of developing celiac disease, and since you and your mother both have it, her risk is probably higher than you would like.

 

Best wishes!

  • 3 weeks later...
mommyto2kids Collaborator

I'd wait for as long as possible. If she does have it, why have a little baby suffer. Just feed her what you eat.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.