Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Are There Less Expensive Ways Of Getting Tested?

sneaky-flute

Recommended Posts

sneaky-flute Rookie
sneaky-flute
Posted

I suspect I have celiac disease and would like to have it confirmed before committing to a lifelong diet. The problem is that the blood test and biopsy cost thousands. Is there a way to get a definitive diagnosis without paying an arm and a leg? 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


bartfull Rising Star
bartfull
Posted

The only thing you could do would be to go completely and strictly gluten-free for a few months and see if your symptoms improve. Then go back to eating gluten for a while and see if your symptoms get worse.

 

If you see and improvement on a gluten-free diet and find your symptoms getting worse again when you challenge, you won't have a diagnosis but you will know you either have celiac or NCGI. The treatment for both is the same - strictly gluten-free for life.

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

Knot sure where you live. Some of the Celiac Centers have free blood testing. You could also see if you qualify for any help? State? County? Public hospital?

LauraTX Rising Star
LauraTX
Posted

If you are trying to do it and can't afford the whole diagnostic workup, Karen's suggestions of a public clinic or research hospital are good.  If you can't find something like that, you could do one blood test at a time to let the results trickle in, and you may get something indicative enough of Celiac disease that you are comfortable calling it that without an endoscopy.  However, if you can manage any way to get the full diagnostic workup and endoscopy, that really can help you know if other things are going on, especially if it turns out to not be Celiac disease.

 

You could also just trial a gluten-free diet now like Bartfull said.  If you are really itching to know and your financial situation allows in the future, it will be a 12 week period of eating gluten.  There are a good number of people here on the forum that did that, and feel no need to go get formally diagnosed.  Just try to weigh the benefits and decide what is best for yourself.

sneaky-flute Rookie
sneaky-flute
Posted
  • Author

What is this "new" celiac test and how do I request it? 

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

What is this "new" celiac test and how do I request it?

What are you referring to?

mamaw Community Regular
mamaw
Posted

No "new" celiac test.. I'm guessing you have no insurance? But if you have symptoms you can go to a free clinic like Bartful said...some states provide a GP doctor for people with needing medical help....Public welfare also has medical programs ...

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


sneaky-flute Rookie
sneaky-flute
Posted
  • Author

I have insurance but from my understanding, these tests can set a person back a grand or two even with insurance. 

 

This test I'm referring to can identify celiac markers with greater specificity and you don't have to eat gluten before undergoing the process. Maybe it's not publicly available yet. 

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

I have insurance but from my understanding, these tests can set a person back a grand or two even with insurance.

This test I'm referring to can identify celiac markers with greater specificity and you don't have to eat gluten before undergoing the process. Maybe it's not publicly available yet.

You can get a genetic test for about $300. It will tell you if you have a possibility of having Celiac. but 30% of people have a gene for Celiac and only about 1% actually develope Celiac. so just having the gene does not mean you have Celiac.

If you just want a basic Celiac panel, call Quest diagnostics and ask for the cost.

Edited to add: I am talking about legitimate, currently available medical testing.

LauraTX Rising Star
LauraTX
Posted

There are no scientifically valid tests (aside from the genetic test) that are accurate when one is not consuming gluten.  Getting something like that is a top priority for Celiac researchers but they are not there yet.  While I understand it is easy to assume something is not affordable, why don't you contact your lab of choice and ask about pricing before you assume as such?  Any money you spend on a diagnosis is an investment in your health for the rest of your life and well worth it in my opinion.  Also, unless your insurance plan has a stacked deductible, you are not going to be paying 100% out of pocket for lab costs.  You can get information on what your portion would be from your insurance company so you can estimate costs and save up to get them done if that is needed.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      Eating grains typically depletes certain B vitamins, so I'm not sure why they decided to fortify with calcium and iron, but hopefully we'll see more B vitamin fortification in gluten-free products going forward.
    2. Rogol72
      - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying...
    3. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin. In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began...
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted...
    5. JoJo0611
      - JoJo0611 replied to JoJo0611's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      CT with contrast.

      Thank you.
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,443
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Mprice
    Newest Member
    Mprice
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Eating grains typically depletes certain B vitamins, so I'm not sure why they decided to fortify with calcium and iron, but hopefully we'll see more B vitamin fortification in gluten-free products going forward.
    • Rogol72
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By Rogol72 · Posted

      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
      CT with contrast.

      By JoJo0611 · Posted

      Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.