Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Result Confusion


TREX

Recommended Posts

TREX Newbie

Hello, I'm new here and I've been reading a lot but I can't find anyone with similar test results. I went to the doctor for a physical recently and thought to mention some minor stomach discomfort. My doctor prescribed me a laxative and that was that. But I got a call later about my hemoglobin count being disturbingly low and my doctor says I have iron deficiency anemia. So great now I get a prescription for iron to take several times a day. But then I get another phone call saying my lab results came back positive for Celiac Sprue so I have to stop eating gluten. I asked for a copy of it and it doesn't look conclusive to me and I was wondering if anyone else had similar results and could interpret this:

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody, IGG, IGA:

tTG IgG Ser-aCnc: Value 3 U/mL

<6 No antibody detected
> or = 6 Antibody detected

tTG IgA Ser-aCnc: Value 9 U/mL

<4 No Antibody Detected
> or = 4 Antibody Detected

So it looks like a negative result for the IgG and a positive for IgA. But I'm not sure what that means. I haven't  ever eaten gluten free but I would probably describe my diet as gluten light most days. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

You just need one positive and you were lucky they caught it. The next step is to get an endoscopy and intestinal biopsies to confirm. Here is a link to the University of Chicago's celiac website that explains celiac disease and testing. Keep eating gluten until all testing is complete!

Open Original Shared Link

Welcome to the forum!

nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board.  :)

 

I would say that the majority of celiacs are not positive in all of the celiac tests done, that's why (good) doctors run so many.  The tTG IgA is considered to be one of the most reliable for diagnosing celiac disease, and is, by far, the test most widely used.  The tTG IgA (tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A) has a specificity for celiac disease of 95%, which means that 95% of all positives are caused by celiac disease; the remaining 5% are caused by other issues like diabetes (T1), crohn's, colitis, liver disease, thyroiditis, or a serious infection.  False negatives don't happen for no reason.

 

The ttG IgG is considered to be much less sensitive for celiac disease than the tTG IgA.  The IGA part of our immune system is based in the mucosal membranes like the mouth and intestines, whereas the IgA part of our immune system is body wide - it makes sense to me that the tTG IgA would be better at detecting celiac disease (than the tTG IgG) for  that reason.  The sensitivity of the tTG IgG is somewhere around 40%, which means it can miss up to 60% of all celiacs... My guess is that this is what happened to you.  

 

Take at look at this article: Open Original Shared Link It discusses the tTG IgG test.

 

If you doubt the diagnosis, you could always ask for confirming tests (before you go gluten-free).  These tests are left:

  • DGP IgA and DGP IgG (deaminated gliadin peptides)
  • EMA IgA (endomysial antibodies)
  • AGA IgA and AGA IgG (anti-gliadin antibodies) - older and less sensitive tests
  • endoscopic biopsy - ensure 6+ samples are taken

This report has more info on the tests:  Open Original Shared Link Please note that none of the tests are 100% sensitive.  Most will miss at least 20% of all celiacs, including the biopsy.

 

I was diagnosed with a positive tTG IgA and EMA IgA.  I skipped the biopsy because those test results are as close to a sure thing as a celiac disease diagnosis can get.  I had celiac disease symptoms so I ran with it.  I'm glad I did.

 

There are over 300 symptoms of celiac disease, and anemia is now considered to be the most common one - that's probably whey they tested you.  Look through this symptom list and see if any others can apply to you... I bet you had more celiac disease symptoms than you realized. Open Original Shared Link

TREX Newbie

Thank you both!

jbeilfuss Newbie

Hi TREX,

 

I'm pretty new here too and still in the process of diagnosis as I have my endoscopy this Thursday - thank heavens it's finally nearly here.  Pursue to endoscopy as that is the next stage and since you have not stopped eating gluten containing food, maybe they can get you in quicker for that so long as you keep eating gluten.  I got really sick before my blood test and stopped eating foods with gluten almost two weeks before they did the draw.  I still had two positive tests, but the GI doc said to eat gluten for 8 weeks before the endoscopy - what a drag to hear that!!  So now, I try to eat one serving of it a day up to this test.  You can see the thread I started back in February if you would like see the experiences of a newbie who might be a little further down the curve than you are.  I have tried to chronicle some of what I have experienced so far.  Good luck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.