Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Does The Biopsy Mean I Have Celiac? New To All Of This.

Miller186

Recommended Posts

Miller186 Newbie
Miller186
Posted

My GI found evidence of Celiac but seems hesitant to say that I actually have Celiac disease.

My doctor gave my biopsy results as: "Small intestine biopsies: intraepithelial lymphocytosis (inflammation) and focal villous blunting" and said this could be due to Celiac Disease. I'm going for blood work on the 16th. From everything I've searched online it says that the biopsy is the standard for diagnosis as people have been known to get false negatives from their blood work.

I have started a gluten-free diet bc I have been in so much pain. It does seem to be helping.

But if the biopsy shows damaged known to be caused by celiac, why would my GI be hesitant to give me that diagnosis, or are the biopsy results not conclusive enough?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Welcome!

Other things can cause intestinal villi damage. Look at this link put out by the University of Chicago:

Open Original Shared Link

The blood tests (make sure the entire panel was ordered) will solidify a diagnosis.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

You need to continue eating gluten until AFTER the blood tests!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Miller186 Newbie
Miller186
Posted
  • Author

Thank you both!

I called and asked my GI doc if I could start the gluten-free diet now due to being in so much pain. He said that I could and that it should not skew the blood test results due to it being such a short amount of time (I just started on Saturday).

I have been worried about this though, I don't want inaccurate results, but I have been feeling much better lately-after an initial rough first day and a half.

Should I go back to eating gluten until my blood work? Ugh the thought of possibly being in pain and discomfort again stinks.

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Research it yourself. You do have to be eating gluten. I thought the blood test was drawn the day of your biopsy. Sorry!

Good catch Squirmingitch!

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

This says a FEW days prior is LIKELY you'll see accurate results. But you stopped on Sat. which will make it 10 days until your blood work. That's TEN days not just a FEW days. You decide.

Open Original Shared Link

Miller186 Newbie
Miller186
Posted
  • Author

OK. Again thank you both so much! I'm glad I came here and asked. I'll definitely stop the gluten-free diet until after my blood work.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

I'm glad you decided to go back to the gluten. I KNOW it's hard & it will be hard on you especially since you've had a "taste" of gluten free but it's for the best in the long run. Docs are forever telling people it will be okay for them to go ahead & go gluten-free & then the labs come back negative & the doc says well you don't have celiac. :blink: Then the poor soul is left facing doing a gluten challenge which is usually worse than when they were just going along eating gluten. OR going without an official dx. Hang in there. It will all be over soon.

You could just eat the gluten -- a slice or 2 of bread -- at night before bed so it might not screw up your days so badly. Or you can go hog wild & eat all your favorite gluten foods as a goodbye to them. I would ask you to eat something special for me but I speak the truth when I say I don't miss anything now. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Miller186 Newbie
Miller186
Posted
  • Author

So my blood work finally came back and was negative for celiac. However, I went back to the gluten-free diet once the blood work was done and I do feel better.

They said that there were white nodules on my esophagus when they did my scope, so I guess that coupled with the intestinal damage are leading them to think I have some sort of food allergy. I'm waiting for my GI to schedule me for a doc to do allergy testing. The doc who did my scope had told me about the nodules and said it could be due to reflux I was having, or something else (he said what it could be but I can't remember/pronounce it) I'm on Zantac and after being on it for 8 weeks I go back for a repeat scope.

This is all so frustrating.

Before I even went to the GI I had started to keep a food log, but it became cumbersome as I felt like almost anything triggeted my symptoms.sometimes something would trigger it one day but not the next.

The doc said to stay on the gluten-free diet.

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

.... I felt like almost anything triggeted my symptoms.sometimes something would trigger it one day but not the next.

 

That was very true for me before I was diagnosed, and in the first year after going gluten-free.  Sometimes I would have symptoms and other times I was fine... Actually I still get like that but with less frequency.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Rogol72
      - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying...
    2. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin. In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began...
    3. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted...
    4. JoJo0611
      - JoJo0611 replied to JoJo0611's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      CT with contrast.

      Thank you.
    5. deanna1ynne
      - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased int...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By Rogol72 · Posted

      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
      CT with contrast.

      By JoJo0611 · Posted

      Thank you. 
    • deanna1ynne
      Inconclusive results

      By deanna1ynne · Posted

      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.