Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lab help


Lissa283

Recommended Posts

Lissa283 Rookie

So, I have posted on here before and been told I may have celiac disease, but I still have questions. My labs are ttg iga (negative), ttg igg (strong positive 12.8), the total iga was normal a couple weeks ago but they never tested it originally. I had a negative biopsy and was told to go gluten free because of all my symptoms which is a LONG list and very similar to the celiac disease symptoms. I also had genetic testing that was negative. I'm so confused. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Are you doubting your diagnosis?  Have you been gluten free since. 3/2015?  Have your symptoms resolved?  

I am a bit confused.  When did you get genetic testing?  Has the original TTG of 12.7 come down?  It sounded like you were borderline or just developing celiac disease.  Did you ever find out how many biopies were taken?   I really not understanding what you need.  This is what you wrote in March:

(IP: 96.229.207.198) · 

Posted 6 March · Report post

So my whole story started 6 months ago when I started getting large, pale, smelly loose stools everyday, serious fatigue, joint pain in my knuckles, headaches, a "haze", nausea, bloating.  I have had GI issues on and off since I was a teen (I'm 32 now).  I went to my PCP, then to an allergist, then to a rhuematologist, and then to a GI. My abnormal tests are as follow:

 

WBC - 2.5 and 3.2 (both low)....I had 3 our of 4 draws be low in a year period

Vit B12 - 350 (again low)

TTG 12.7 (normal is <6...6-8 is weak postive)

 

I recently had an endoscopy and colonoscopy which showed chronic gastritis and "reactive lymphoid aggregates" in my colon....celiac was negative.  I have read this finding could mean crohn's or ulcerative colitis, but I don't really meet any of the other diagnosing criteria for those inflammatory disorders.  

 

I haven't heard back from my doctor about what the next step with be....They did not check a whole celiac panal (only the ttg), but after my endo/colo, the doctor told my husband that I should start a gluten-free diet.  

 

What should I think of all this??

 

Please help!

  0
Lissa283 Rookie

I know it's confusing. 

January-labs were done and ttg iga (negative) and ttg igg 12.7 (positive), no total iga was done or any other celiac labs

february- endoscopy was negative

march-was told to go gluten free 

I have been gluten free since then and all my symptoms resolved

october- had my labs redrawn, including genetic testing, which all came back negative and now they tell me I don't have celiac. They DID NOT check the ttg igg, they only did the iga. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Ugh!  How can your doctors rule out celiac when they don't run the same tests that they did the first time around?  Have they forgotten the basics from their fifth grade science protect?  They keep throwing in different variables!  

I tested positive on the DGP iga  only when I was first diagnosed.  I got glutened in July.  I did not know what glutened me, but it was bad.  Went to my new doc (new insurance) and she is only authorized to order the TTG.  The results were negative and she anticipated that so she referred me to a GI who could run the entire panel.  Yep, my DGP iga  result was positive.  I did get glutened.  Unfortunately, it can not tell me the cause of my glutening and I am not Miss Marple (though I tried).  

Your doctor should have ordered the TTG IGG test.

There have been studies showing that there  are celiacs who do not have the standard sets of genes.  You can google that.  And there are studies that show it is easy to miss damage in the intestine.  You need to find out how many samples were taken and evaluated by the pathologist.  Doctors still do not know much about celiac disease.  Reasearch is constantly evolving.

finally, your symptoms resolved on the gluten-free diet.  Pretty telling, isn't it?  Think about this.  Do you really need a firm diagnosis?  My hubby went gluten-free 14 years ago per the advice of my allergist and his GP.  It worked.  Gluten was a problem for him.  He has maintained the diet for all these years.  He refuses to do a challenge and I can not blame him.  I needed a firm diagnosis because I was shocked that we would both have it.  Plus, I was anemic at the time and going through menopause.  I did not have tummy issues!  I wanted to know for sure!  

I hope this helps.  ?

 

 

Lissa283 Rookie

It's really more for peace of mind and to ensure that I get proper follow up. I work as a nurse in healthcare and I know how hard it is to get things you need. I also hate not knowing for sure. What if it's crohns or something else? They just stop the search and say you have gluten sensitivity, which might not be the right answer. In my gut I feel like it's celiac disease with everything I've read about other people's experiences and the literature. I hate that medicine just lumps me into the larger probability when I may be the outlier that is the one percent with celiac without the gene. 

nvsmom Community Regular

Strong positive tTG tests are usually caused by celiac disease, 95% of the time.  There is a false negative rate of about 5%, but they generally are not strong positives.  If the range is 1-4, a weak positive is a 4.5 or 5.  KWIM?

I agree with Cyclinglady that your doctors seem to have lost their wits.  Plus if you retest after going gluten-free, your labs should be negative.  We all worked, or are working towards that.

The genetic tests are not perfect either. It appears that 97% of celiacs have those genes (DQ2 and or DQ8) but about 3% don't. It is rare but it happens.

With celiac follow up care, all you really need is to check nutrients (Ca, Mg, K, Fe, ferritin, Zn, Cu, B12, D, A), check bone density, check for anemia (the most common celiac disease symptom) and keep an eye out for other autoimmune diseases, especially hashimoto's and T1D.  Some doctors like to check dietary compliance with the blood tests, but doing that before eating gluten-free for at LEAST 6 months is often pointless since the tTG antibodies can take months or a good year or more to come down.

I would do what you can to get a celiac disease diagnosis, but if you can't get that then get one for non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) so it is one your record in case you need medical care (or hospital food) in the future.

Hang in there.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,442
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nony
    Newest Member
    Nony
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.