Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Interpreting celiac serology


Donna73

Recommended Posts

Donna73 Apprentice

I finally got a hold of my test results and while it all says positive, Im wondering what the actual test results mean:

 

Test             My Value                                   Reference Range

DGP, IgG:   256.0                                           less than 4.9

DGP, IgA     60.0                                           less than 6.1

TTG IgA      Greater than 128                     less than 10.3

EMA igA:   Positive                                       negative

Total iGa   388                                              13-adult:  44-441

 

The summary says "results support a diagnosis of celiac disease and then for eahc of the 4 tests it says positive.  

 

Im just wondering if anybody has experience in interpreting this.  Im trying to decide whether to do the biopsy and if my numbers are considered really high then I might forego.  If there is a quesiton, I may go through with it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Yep, that is about as positive as it gets!  I am sorry, but you probably have celiac disease ?. The good news is that with a gluten free diet and LOTS of time, you should feel better.  

The endoscopy?  That is a personal decision you need to make with your doctor.  Some doctors will not give an official diagnosis without it.  Others are willing to give that diagnosis based on the blood tests and improved symptoms on a gluten-free diet.  

I personally needed it.  Anemia was my main symptom (no tummy issues).    My hubby had been gluten-free for 12 years and I could not believe that we both needed to be gluten free.  So, I had the endoscopy.  Biopsied revealed a Marsh Stage IIIB a (Moderate to severe damage).  It gave me a baseline of damage in case I need a follow-up endoscopy.  Having a very firm diagnosis made it easy for my family to get tested even those without symptoms (all first degree relatives should be tested).  

I am sure you will do what is best for you!  

Welcome to the forum!  Check out the Newbie 101 section under "coping".  It contains valuable advice!

 

Gemini Experienced
17 hours ago, Donna73 said:

I finally got a hold of my test results and while it all says positive, Im wondering what the actual test results mean:

 

Test             My Value                                   Reference Range

DGP, IgG:   256.0                                           less than 4.9

DGP, IgA     60.0                                           less than 6.1

TTG IgA      Greater than 128                     less than 10.3

EMA igA:   Positive                                       negative

Total iGa   388                                              13-adult:  44-441

 

The summary says "results support a diagnosis of celiac disease and then for eahc of the 4 tests it says positive.  

 

Im just wondering if anybody has experience in interpreting this.  Im trying to decide whether to do the biopsy and if my numbers are considered really high then I might forego.  If there is a quesiton, I may go through with it.

The DGP tests are for reaction to the gluten you are ingesting.  Needless to say, your body does not like gluten.  :o

The Ttg IgA tests for damage to your intestine but the high number does not necessarily correlate with more severe damage. Some people have low numbers with a lot of damage at biopsy and others have high numbers with more moderate damage. Doesn't matter.........damage is damage.

The Total IgA test is just to check to make sure you produce enough IgA antibody to make the test reliable. Some people are IgA deficient so they would have to revert to the IgG antibody testing or biopsy.  You definitely have enough antibody for testing.

The EMA IgA is the slam dunk for Celiac Disease.  No other disease but Celiac will trip that for positive. With all of your testing in the high positive range, you have Celiac Disease and biopsy would be a choice matter for you.  I was in the same boat at diagnosis.  Very high numbers at diagnosis so I skipped the endo and never looked back. 10 years later and I am doing great!  But if you want to know how much damage you might have, then you will want to have the biopsy. I have never personally met any doctor in 10 years who doubted my diagnosis, once they saw my Celiac panel.

Good luck and welcome to the club!  :D

Donna73 Apprentice

Thanks everybody. Its all very confusing. But, I am learning.  This website is great.  Lots of information.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    4. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    5. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,442
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mprice
    Newest Member
    Mprice
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      It's strange because I'm pretty sure not too long ago I picked up a loaf of bread with B vitamins, but I can't find a single one now.  Probably cutbacks, everyone's trying to save money now!
    • Scott Adams
      Eating grains typically depletes certain B vitamins, so I'm not sure why they decided to fortify with calcium and iron, but hopefully we'll see more B vitamin fortification in gluten-free products going forward.
    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.