Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Interpreting celiac serology


Donna73

Recommended Posts

Donna73 Apprentice

I finally got a hold of my test results and while it all says positive, Im wondering what the actual test results mean:

 

Test             My Value                                   Reference Range

DGP, IgG:   256.0                                           less than 4.9

DGP, IgA     60.0                                           less than 6.1

TTG IgA      Greater than 128                     less than 10.3

EMA igA:   Positive                                       negative

Total iGa   388                                              13-adult:  44-441

 

The summary says "results support a diagnosis of celiac disease and then for eahc of the 4 tests it says positive.  

 

Im just wondering if anybody has experience in interpreting this.  Im trying to decide whether to do the biopsy and if my numbers are considered really high then I might forego.  If there is a quesiton, I may go through with it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Yep, that is about as positive as it gets!  I am sorry, but you probably have celiac disease ?. The good news is that with a gluten free diet and LOTS of time, you should feel better.  

The endoscopy?  That is a personal decision you need to make with your doctor.  Some doctors will not give an official diagnosis without it.  Others are willing to give that diagnosis based on the blood tests and improved symptoms on a gluten-free diet.  

I personally needed it.  Anemia was my main symptom (no tummy issues).    My hubby had been gluten-free for 12 years and I could not believe that we both needed to be gluten free.  So, I had the endoscopy.  Biopsied revealed a Marsh Stage IIIB a (Moderate to severe damage).  It gave me a baseline of damage in case I need a follow-up endoscopy.  Having a very firm diagnosis made it easy for my family to get tested even those without symptoms (all first degree relatives should be tested).  

I am sure you will do what is best for you!  

Welcome to the forum!  Check out the Newbie 101 section under "coping".  It contains valuable advice!

 

Gemini Experienced
17 hours ago, Donna73 said:

I finally got a hold of my test results and while it all says positive, Im wondering what the actual test results mean:

 

Test             My Value                                   Reference Range

DGP, IgG:   256.0                                           less than 4.9

DGP, IgA     60.0                                           less than 6.1

TTG IgA      Greater than 128                     less than 10.3

EMA igA:   Positive                                       negative

Total iGa   388                                              13-adult:  44-441

 

The summary says "results support a diagnosis of celiac disease and then for eahc of the 4 tests it says positive.  

 

Im just wondering if anybody has experience in interpreting this.  Im trying to decide whether to do the biopsy and if my numbers are considered really high then I might forego.  If there is a quesiton, I may go through with it.

The DGP tests are for reaction to the gluten you are ingesting.  Needless to say, your body does not like gluten.  :o

The Ttg IgA tests for damage to your intestine but the high number does not necessarily correlate with more severe damage. Some people have low numbers with a lot of damage at biopsy and others have high numbers with more moderate damage. Doesn't matter.........damage is damage.

The Total IgA test is just to check to make sure you produce enough IgA antibody to make the test reliable. Some people are IgA deficient so they would have to revert to the IgG antibody testing or biopsy.  You definitely have enough antibody for testing.

The EMA IgA is the slam dunk for Celiac Disease.  No other disease but Celiac will trip that for positive. With all of your testing in the high positive range, you have Celiac Disease and biopsy would be a choice matter for you.  I was in the same boat at diagnosis.  Very high numbers at diagnosis so I skipped the endo and never looked back. 10 years later and I am doing great!  But if you want to know how much damage you might have, then you will want to have the biopsy. I have never personally met any doctor in 10 years who doubted my diagnosis, once they saw my Celiac panel.

Good luck and welcome to the club!  :D

Donna73 Apprentice

Thanks everybody. Its all very confusing. But, I am learning.  This website is great.  Lots of information.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,338
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Erica Johnson
    Newest Member
    Erica Johnson
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Been off this forum for years. Is it that important that you get an official diagnosis of something? It appears like you had a trigger (wheat, gluten, whatever) and removing it has resolved your symptom. I can't speak for you, but I had known what my trigger was (gluten) years before my diagnosis I would just stay gluten-free and get on with my symptom free condition. I was diagnosed over 20 years ago and have been symptom free only excluding wheat, rye and barley. I tolerate all naturally gluten free whole foods including things like beans which actually helps to form the stools. 
    • trents
      No coincidence. Recent revisions to gluten challenge guidelines call for the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of 3 weeks. If possible, I would extend that two weeks to ensure valid testing.
    • SilkieFairy
      Thank you both for the replies. I decided to bring back gluten so I can do the blood test. Today is Day #2 of the Challenge. Yesterday I had about 3 slices of whole wheat bread and I woke up with urgent diarrhea this morning. It was orange, sandy and had the distinctive smell that I did not have when I was briefly gluten free. I don't know if it's a coincidence, but the brain fog is back and I feel very tired.   
    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.