Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

MandiJ

Recommended Posts

MandiJ Newbie

Hello,

After 17 years of issues, I was told a month ago that I have Crohn's disease.  This did not set well with me and I just feel it in my gut (pun intended) that it is not what I have.  I have bowel issues, abdominal pain, bloating, nausea and vomiting, and joint pain.  In 2014 I had my IGA and Ttg Iga check- it came back a 4.  I was told that was negative and a positive would be over 20.  Now that I am having many more issues, I was tested again- after I was gluten free and on steroids and it was a 0, but now I was told it would be positive it over equal to or over 4.   It was the same lab who did it, so I called and all they would do is refer to me their website with info on the tests.  It says over 4 is a positive.  So could they have made a mistake on the first paper in stating what a positive was?  Has anyone every been given a range of over 20 as positive? All I can find is 4 or over.  Wondering if I really am celiac or actually do have Crohn's. 

 

thanks for any help you can provide.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Bobkat Newbie

Working in a lab , I can tell you that the method of testing could have changed. Therefore the "normal or negative range "could be different . What you need to see is the actual report from the lab who did the initial testing to look at the range and interpretation on that report.  The lab who did mine is positive over 4. So each testing facility can be different.  Hope this helps?

 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Bobkat is right.  You have to look at the lab ranges at the time the test was taken as they can change.  Lab ranges vary depending on the lab.  

I would question my doctor as to why they would re-test you for celiac disease knowing that you were on steriods and were gluten free?   You must be consuming gluten daily for a period of 8 to 12 weeks for the celiac blood panel to be accurate.  Even stopping for two weeks, can impact the test (University of Chicago Celiac Website).  

Why did you go gluten free?  You could consider a gluten challenge and get re-tested in 12 weeks.  If you receive any positives on the panel (besides the IGA deficiency control test .....by the way, I assume yours was originally normal....), the next step is biopsies of the small intestine via endoscopy.   Ask for the complete panel and not just the Ttg IgA screening which can be elevated when you have an autoimmune disorder like Crohn's or Hashimoto's Thyroiditis.   

MandiJ Newbie

Both tests were done by the same lab, just 1.5 years apart.  

I quit eating gluten along with soy, corn, and dairy- I am reading the immune recovery system and everything I have researched states that folks with crohn's should not be eating gluten.  With how much better I feel, I really don't want to do a gluten challenge to see if I test positive.  My biopsy showed no villi issues, but did find multiple ulcers and damage in my small intestines.  I was just confused about why the same lab, with the same test, would have different measures.

cyclinglady Grand Master

I think you mis-understood.  Lab ranges can vary from lab to lab.  Lab ranges can also change at the same lab if testing protochol has been changed (new management, ownership, cost reduction, the list is endless.....). 1.5 years?  Many things could have changed within the same lab.  Your  best bet is to compare your test results side by side.  Ask the lab or your doctor for a printout of your lab results.  

mommida Enthusiast

Many things could have changed in 1.5 years for the tests.  I think you are on the right track going gluten free as I have found numerous reports gluten free helps for auto-immune illnesses.  You have been feeling better, and a gluten challenge could make you very ill.  I would what for an accidental gluten exposure to see how you feel for further proof.

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    4. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    5. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,443
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nannie J
    Newest Member
    Nannie J
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      It's strange because I'm pretty sure not too long ago I picked up a loaf of bread with B vitamins, but I can't find a single one now.  Probably cutbacks, everyone's trying to save money now!
    • Scott Adams
      Eating grains typically depletes certain B vitamins, so I'm not sure why they decided to fortify with calcium and iron, but hopefully we'll see more B vitamin fortification in gluten-free products going forward.
    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.