Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Feeling confused. Gluten sensitive or celiacs?


SuperWhoLock88

Recommended Posts

SuperWhoLock88 Newbie

About four months ago my mom brought my attention to the signs of gluten sensitivity and celiac. I read as much as I could find about it and figured there was a good chance it fit but I also read to not just go off of gluten because it would screw up the testing. So I waited and spoke with my doctor who told me to go ahead and go off of gluten for a month and see if the symptoms go away then of they do eat gluten see if they came back. I did so and the difference it has made for my health has been crazy. I ate a flour tortilla and started having the gastrointestinal issues again so I've stayed away from gluten. Well today I ate some normal noodles because it was all I had at the house and I didn't think just that little bit would cause issues because I thought I just had a sensitivity to gluten but literally within an hour I felt bloated and started having stomach problems. And even now my stomach is hurting and we'll pardon me for the crudeness but I have a constant feeling of needing to poop but am constipated. I also have a little rash type thing on my legs. So I'm wondering if it's possible I actually have celiac's and not just a sensitivity and if so do I need to get more medical testing? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran

Your doctor flubbed up big time if he told you to go gluten-free before doing testing.  Diagnosis involves both blood tests for gliaden antibodies and an endoscopy to take biopsy samples for gut damage analysis.  If you want to get tested now after a month off gluten, you'll need to start eating gluten again for 12 weeks.  It's often easier and less painful to do the celiac testing before starting the gluten-free diet.

Open Original Shared Link

  • Prior to blood testing we recommend 12 weeks of eating gluten.
  • Prior to an endoscopic biopsy we recommend 2 weeks of eating gluten.

In the case of a severe reaction to gluten, a medical professional may opt to shorten the 12-week challenge and move immediately to an endoscopic biopsy. May, 2013

SuperWhoLock88 Newbie

That's what I figured. I guess my next question is how important is it for me to be tested? Like am I ok to just stop eating gluten or is a test super important?

cyclinglady Grand Master

This article says it well:

Open Original Shared Link

Here is the author's bio (MD, celiac herself, training at U of Chicago (leading research hospital, celiac disease and a dietician!):  

Open Original Shared Link

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    4. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,442
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mprice
    Newest Member
    Mprice
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Eating grains typically depletes certain B vitamins, so I'm not sure why they decided to fortify with calcium and iron, but hopefully we'll see more B vitamin fortification in gluten-free products going forward.
    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.