Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Are these results 'normal'?


juliaanna1701

Recommended Posts

juliaanna1701 Newbie

Hi all

 

I was diagnosed with Dermatitis Herpetiformis back in 2011 when I was in holidays in england - this was confirmed via a biopsy by a dermatologist and also I had coeliac blood tests and gene tests done which were 'strongly indicative of coeliac disease' 

I live in australia and as I was only over in london for a few months could not have an endoscopy done but was advised by medical doctors over there to commence a Gluten free diet asap as I was severely anemic and had extreme fatigue (along with the DH rash which was sooo painful and itchy!) 

I returned to australia after a few months totally gluten free and booked in to have an endoscopy, but could not complete the gluten challenge - I ate gluten containing foods for five days and lost two kilos, had extreme nausea and bloating, fatigue and an outbreak of ulcers in my mouth. My doctor said it was not medically advisable to continue otherwise I would become medically compromised. 

Five years later and I was scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy to check for IBD (crohn's) due to bloody diarrhea and again weight loss and fatigue, along with anaemia (still eating strictly gluten free)

As I was diagnosed in england, the gastro over here wanted to do the 'gold standard' and get biopsies for a 'proper' coeliac diagnosis - but it was like ground hog day and the same thing happened and I was medically advised to stop the gluten challenge as I was almost sick enough to be admitted to hospital (plus the DH rash came back almost immediately) 

Here are my biopsy results - my specialist has said I don't have coeliac based on these results, but as I have been strictly gluten free for five years and had the positive blood work and gene testing, should I just ignore them? My doctor is more than happy to still say I have coeliac disease and she thinks the specialist is an idiot. 

Thoughts? 

 

 

 

Screen Shot 2017-01-20 at 8.55.05 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-01-20 at 8.54.57 PM.png


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

But you were diagnosed with DH by biopsy, so you have Celiac and do not need any further testing.

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

A skin biopsy should be done on a non-affected portion of the skin near the rash when there is an outbreak. It’s not necessary to perform an intestinal biopsy to establish the diagnosis of celiac disease in a patient with DH; the skin biopsy is definitive. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

I agree with your doctor that your specialist is an idiot.  You have celiac disease.  It just presents primarily in your skin.   Remain gluten free!  There is plenty of documentation to support what Karen posted. 

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

But...my niece was recently diagnosed with Crohn's (I was sure she had celiac disease) via a pill camera.  It was found at the very end of the small intestine away from the reach of the scopes.  Just some thing to think about.  

I hope you feel better soon!  

squirmingitch Veteran

Furthermore, you were gluten free for 5 long years & unable to complete the gluten challenge for the endoscopic biopsies so of course it was negative. The specialist is an idiot! 

As Karen linked, you had a positive biopsy for dh & that is definitive. No further testing is needed to confirm a dx of celiac. 

You might wish to teach the specialist though by sending him a copy of what Karen linked as well as this:

Open Original Shared Link

juliaanna1701 Newbie

Thanks everyone,

I found the blood test results I had noted down in my travel journal - apparently anything about 5U/ml is considered a positive for the TGA (Total anti-tissue transglutaminase tests) tests that they do in England for coeliac serology. Mine where"

203 U/ml (anything about 5u/ml positive; more than 10x upper level (5) is immediately checked with an EMA test + HLA DQ2/DQ2 test too - both where positive. 

The doctor over there said that they were 100% convinced I had coeliac disease, esp with the positive DH diagnosis so that they would recommend against a small bowel biopsy as it would just be unnessecary given my blood results to confirm the diagnosis. 

I guess my specialist is an idiot. Is a small bowel biopsy still really the gold standard though? He won't take me seriously if I don't have one, but as I have been strictly GLUTEN FREE since 2011 then how much damage would a scope show? I hate surgery as well :(

Thoughts? 

Jmg Mentor

I think you have celiac and your doctor rather than the specialist is right. The combination of the blood test, DH and the positive reaction to the diet would be enough corroboration for many doctors without a further challenge and biopsy. 

On this point:

7 hours ago, juliaanna1701 said:

Is a small bowel biopsy still really the gold standard though? He won't take me seriously if I don't have one, but as I have been strictly GLUTEN FREE since 2011 then how much damage would a scope show? I hate surgery as well :(

The biopsy shouldn't require surgery. It's done as part of the endoscopy. The endoscope cant take small samples as it goes along. So if you're having an endoscopy for checking for Crohns they could take some samples at same time?

Best of luck to you :)
 

squirmingitch Veteran

Again:

Open Original Shared Link

Can a skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) confirm celiac disease or is an endoscopy still needed?

A skin biopsy should be done on a non-affected portion of the skin near the rash when there is an outbreak. It’s not necessary to perform an intestinal biopsy to establish the diagnosis of celiac disease in a patient with DH; the skin biopsy is definitive. July, 2012

 

The intestinal biopsy is NOT the gold standard when dealing with dh!!!! NO intestinal biopsy needed! You would have to eat gluten for at least 2 weeks prior to an endoscopic biopsy or else you'll get a false negative. AND you know what eating gluten means for the dh right? Do you want to go through the rash again???? :o:ph34r: PLUS, those of us with dh tend to have patchier gut damage than "regular" celiacs so it's entirely possible he will miss the "sweet spots". Then he'll feel vindicated in saying you don't have celiac disease even though he doesn't know his head from his @$$. There is no reason for him to doubt your previous & longstanding diagnosis!

I think you should print out copies & send them to this idiot & tell him to get up to speed!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



juliaanna1701 Newbie

Thanks everyone - yes I do know endoscopy isn't actual surgery, but anything to do with needles and hospitals sends me into a panic! 

I'm going to find a new specialist - this one has made me doubt myself and my health so much and it seems to be so unwarranted I don't need that in my life. And plus last time he 'tried' to get me to do a gluten challenge I lasted five Days before having to be admitted to hospital with severe dehydration and a 2kg weight loss. No way I could last two weeks even!

Thanks all for being there to back me up appreciate it :) Biopsy isn't always needed for a diagnostic assessment and diagnosis!

squirmingitch Veteran
3 hours ago, juliaanna1701 said:

Thanks everyone - yes I do know endoscopy isn't actual surgery, but anything to do with needles and hospitals sends me into a panic! 

I'm going to find a new specialist - this one has made me doubt myself and my health so much and it seems to be so unwarranted I don't need that in my life. And plus last time he 'tried' to get me to do a gluten challenge I lasted five Days before having to be admitted to hospital with severe dehydration and a 2kg weight loss. No way I could last two weeks even!

Thanks all for being there to back me up appreciate it :) Biopsy isn't always needed for a diagnostic assessment and diagnosis!

Good girl! I think it's real smart to find a new specialist.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,668
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CDR40
    Newest Member
    CDR40
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.