Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Deamidated Gliadin Abs: New or Old Test? Please help interpret results.


Questioning

Recommended Posts

Questioning Rookie

Back again, after having your help with my daughter's testing and diagnosis.  Her gastro recommended the immediate family be tested.  We know it is from my side so it made sense for me to get tested.  At any rate, my testing came back as follows, after following a mostly  gluten-free diet for 5 months due to my daughter.  I have gluten about once/week when on a date with my spouse.  

t­Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA:     <2 U/mL   (Normal)
t­Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG:     <2 U/mL  (Normal)
Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA:    47 units  H  (Normal:  1-19)
Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG:    17 units       (Normal 1-19)
Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum: 165 mg/dL  (Normal)

I cannot tell if this is the new Gliadin test or old and if that is why my general practitioner (GP) said my results were "normal".  Looking at Labcorp, here was the test, which they list the synonym for the test as GDP (new test).

Open Original Shared Link

Just hoping for some assistance, as you all were helpful before.  My GP kinda chuckled when I asked for the testing and then informed me my results were "normal".  I'm not sure if this is worth pursuing with a gastro or whether this test is not celiac-specific.

Thank you in advance!

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

You should follow up with your GI doctor.  That test is clearly positive and it is celiac specific. Your doctor should not have acted like that when you asked to be tested. You may want to find a more celiac savvy GP.  If you have been mostly gluten free you may need to go back on a regular gluten diet for a bit before you get more celiac testing.

cyclinglady Grand Master

It is NOT normal.  I speak from experience.  Only my DGP IgA was above range and the rest of the celiac panel was negative.  My biopsies reveal moderate to severe damage.  There is a reason there are several celiac tests.  Not all have to be positive -- only one.  Even in follow-up testing, I continue to test positive to only the DGP IgA.  My GI no longer bothers to order the rest of the panel. 

Mind you, my only symptom was a long history of anemia (low ferritin and I have a 2nd genetic anemia on top of that).  I had no gut issues at all!  I was shocked.  

Your GP is wrong.  Find a GI who knows about celiac disease.  

 

RMJ Mentor

Deamidated gliadin is the "new" test, the old one is just gliadin (if I understand what you are asking.  

Definitely a positive and not normal.

Questioning Rookie

Thanks, all.  I will follow up with a gastro.

Yes, RMJ, I wasn't sure about the old vs. new testing.  Mine doesn't specify PEPTIDE, so I wasn't sure if it was the new test.  The Labcorp code suggests it is the peptide test, but I just wasn't sure I was correct.

 

 

ironictruth Proficient

The DGP is certainly positive. Even the newer test can be a false positive though. I tested positive to one DGP test and negative on another within days. This can also happen to first degree relatives. So, I am in your boat as I have a first degree relative with celiac. 

Cycling Lady is right. Find a celiac saavy GI. I would not waste your time with docs who 1) chuckle at what could be destroying your body or 2) are too quick to diagnose based on the labs and put you on a restrictive diet for what might be a false positive. Trust me, I know from experience and am now going to an expert. 

Good luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.