Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Deamidated Gliadin Abs: New or Old Test? Please help interpret results.


Questioning

Recommended Posts

Questioning Rookie

Back again, after having your help with my daughter's testing and diagnosis.  Her gastro recommended the immediate family be tested.  We know it is from my side so it made sense for me to get tested.  At any rate, my testing came back as follows, after following a mostly  gluten-free diet for 5 months due to my daughter.  I have gluten about once/week when on a date with my spouse.  

t­Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA:     <2 U/mL   (Normal)
t­Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG:     <2 U/mL  (Normal)
Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA:    47 units  H  (Normal:  1-19)
Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG:    17 units       (Normal 1-19)
Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum: 165 mg/dL  (Normal)

I cannot tell if this is the new Gliadin test or old and if that is why my general practitioner (GP) said my results were "normal".  Looking at Labcorp, here was the test, which they list the synonym for the test as GDP (new test).

Open Original Shared Link

Just hoping for some assistance, as you all were helpful before.  My GP kinda chuckled when I asked for the testing and then informed me my results were "normal".  I'm not sure if this is worth pursuing with a gastro or whether this test is not celiac-specific.

Thank you in advance!

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

You should follow up with your GI doctor.  That test is clearly positive and it is celiac specific. Your doctor should not have acted like that when you asked to be tested. You may want to find a more celiac savvy GP.  If you have been mostly gluten free you may need to go back on a regular gluten diet for a bit before you get more celiac testing.

cyclinglady Grand Master

It is NOT normal.  I speak from experience.  Only my DGP IgA was above range and the rest of the celiac panel was negative.  My biopsies reveal moderate to severe damage.  There is a reason there are several celiac tests.  Not all have to be positive -- only one.  Even in follow-up testing, I continue to test positive to only the DGP IgA.  My GI no longer bothers to order the rest of the panel. 

Mind you, my only symptom was a long history of anemia (low ferritin and I have a 2nd genetic anemia on top of that).  I had no gut issues at all!  I was shocked.  

Your GP is wrong.  Find a GI who knows about celiac disease.  

 

RMJ Mentor

Deamidated gliadin is the "new" test, the old one is just gliadin (if I understand what you are asking.  

Definitely a positive and not normal.

Questioning Rookie

Thanks, all.  I will follow up with a gastro.

Yes, RMJ, I wasn't sure about the old vs. new testing.  Mine doesn't specify PEPTIDE, so I wasn't sure if it was the new test.  The Labcorp code suggests it is the peptide test, but I just wasn't sure I was correct.

 

 

ironictruth Proficient

The DGP is certainly positive. Even the newer test can be a false positive though. I tested positive to one DGP test and negative on another within days. This can also happen to first degree relatives. So, I am in your boat as I have a first degree relative with celiac. 

Cycling Lady is right. Find a celiac saavy GI. I would not waste your time with docs who 1) chuckle at what could be destroying your body or 2) are too quick to diagnose based on the labs and put you on a restrictive diet for what might be a false positive. Trust me, I know from experience and am now going to an expert. 

Good luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,743
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MistyMoon
    Newest Member
    MistyMoon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.