Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Genetics Test Questions


RayB

Recommended Posts

RayB Newbie

I've been feeling unhealthy, but most of my blood test results have been normal.  I feel worse (digestive and neurological symptoms) after eating gluten, and I did have a positive Endomysial Ab (IgA) Screen, so my doctor sent me to get blood work for HLA TYPING FOR CELIAC DISEASE.

I'm trying to figure out what my results mean.

HLA-DQ2 (DQA1*05/DQB1*02): Positive
HLA-DQ8 (DQA1*03/DQB1*0302): Negative

HLA-DQA1*: 02
HLA-DQA1*: 05
HLA-DQB1*: 0202
HLA-DQB1*: 0301

I've found several resources online that show any combination of (DQA1*05/DQB1*02) means DQ2.5, which is the most common combination for Celiac Disease.

Other resources I have found show that DQ2.5 requires HLA-DQA1*:0501 and HLA-DQB1*: 0201, which I don't have because I have HLA-DQB1*: 0202, and I don't know the last two digits of my second HLA-DQA1.

However, I found some resources that show HLA-DQA1*: 0505 and HLA-DQB1*: 0202 are also considered DQ2.5, which I also don't know if I have because don't know the last two digits of my second HLA-DQA1.

Then I found out that HLA-DQA1*: 0201 and HLA-DQB1*: 0202 means DQ2.2, which is a less common combination for Celiac Disease, which I also don't know if I have because I don't know the last two digits of my first HLA-DQA1.

So I'm wondering what conclusions I can even draw from these tests. I match the criteria for HLA-DQ2, but can I not determine anything more in depth because the blood tests only show two digits for both of my HLA-DQA1? I've been trying to research and understand, but there are so many resources online with either vague or conflicting information that it's overwhelming. I'm ignoring the HLA-DQB1*: 0301 since I don't think it's related, but I'm trying to figure out how the HLA-DQA1*: 02, HLA-DQA1*: 05, and HLA-DQB1*: 0202 can combine to form combinations that put me at different levels of risk from Celiac Disease.

I would appreciate if anyone can help my understanding of these results. Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran

Hi RayB,

The gene tests can't tell a person the have celiac disease.  Only that they are in the group that might get celiac disease.  The genes are actually fairly common, but celiac disease is much less common than the genes presence.

frieze Community Regular

the money spent on gene testing should have been spent on complete celiac testing.  money poorly spent.  ask doc why he wanted it.  and pursue complete testing.

RayB Newbie

Thanks for the answers. I know very little about the science behind genes, but I've spent hours researching and trying to understand what the results of the test mean. It's discouraging to find out that they tell very little.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Some 30% of the population has the genes that can develop into celiac disease, but that is a very few.  Gene testing is best to exclude celiac disease.  Somethines doctor's order it because they do not want to do an endoscopy.  Genes, positive blood tests and a trial diet helps lead to a diagnosis, but experts since prefer an endoscopy to obtain biopsies.  

You had a positive EMA.  That means you should be scheduled for an endoscopy.  Strange to run the one test that is the most expensive in the celiac panel (or it takes longer to get results?).  Learn more:

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Keep eating gluten until all testing is done.  This is so critical!!!!,

TexasJen Collaborator

This is from Quest Diagnostic, but it's pretty good....

Susceptibility to celiac disease is linked to certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II alleles, especially in the HLA-DQ region. HLA molecules are postulated to present gluten antigens to T-cells which in turn induce tissue damage.2 Approximately 95% of patients with celiac disease have the HLA-DQ2 heterodimer encoded by the DQA1*05and DQB1*02 alleles, while close to 5% have the HLA-DQ8 heterodimer encoded by the DQA1*03 and DQB1*0302 alleles.1 Rarely, patients will carry only one of the DQ2 alleles; ie, either DQA1*05 or DQB1*02.3The HLA-DQ alleles are also found in 48% to 65% of first-degree relatives of patients with celiac disease and up to 73% of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; thus, these individuals are at increased risk of developing celiac disease.1 Other high-risk groups include those with autoimmune thyroiditis; Down, Turner, or Williams syndrome; selective IgA deficiency; or individuals with symptoms of unexplained iron deficiency anemia or premature-onset osteoporosis.1,4

Since 25% to 40% of the United States population has either DQ2 or DQ8, the presence of either heterodimer is not diagnostic of celiac disease.1 Thus, the primary use of HLA-DQ typing is to rule out celiac disease and genetic susceptibility for celiac disease. Such typing is particularly relevant when pathology of the small intestine is equivocal, serological testing is consistent with celiac disease but villous atrophy is absent, a gluten-free diet is being considered in the absence of biopsy-proven celiac disease, and a first-degree relative has been diagnosed with celiac disease.5 Determining genetic susceptibility can avoid unnecessary small intestine biopsy, continual serologic testing, and initiation of a gluten-free diet, especially in individuals in high-risk groups.1,4

I think your doc did it to rule out celiac - meaning IF it had been NEGATIVE it would have been helpful. Then he/she could say definitively that you don't have celiac. But, since it's positive, it's not particularly helpful. You need more information now to confirm or rule out the diagnosis of celiac. And, as cycling lady said, that's probably an endoscopy.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,668
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CDR40
    Newest Member
    CDR40
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.