Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Clarifying the test results


KAG1010

Recommended Posts

KAG1010 Newbie

Hi Everyone, 

 

i am am brand new to the board.  Here's my background briefly.  I am 40. I have been trying to have a baby since 2010.  I have been pregnant twice and both ended in miscarriage. A new doctor for IVF ordered a recurrent loss workup.  I see my test results but have a few more tests to do before I am following up with the doctor.  My test results that I believe have to do with celiac are as follows:

 

endomysial Iga Antibody is negative

Tissue Transglutaminase Iga is 44.9. Standard range is 0-19. 

 

Reading through some posts here I think I'm understanding that the Iga antibody is used to show whether the tissue transglutaminase Iga is valid, and not a false positive? Is that accurate? 

 

After 6 rounds of IVF, I feel like I'm a googling expert but for some reason this is really confusing to me! 

 

Thank you in advance!

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



emma6 Enthusiast

the test you had which is listed as negative is called EMA

Open Original Shared Link

your thinking of total Iga which checks that you are not deficient in Iga and are able to produce antibodies. people with an Iga deficiency can get false negative results.

since you tested positive for ttg iga that suggests you're not iga deficient and you most likely have celiac disease.

you can still have celiac with a negative EMA. not everyone will test positive for every test its very hit or miss. so even if none of your other tests come back positive for celiac, the positive ttg iga is enough.

looks like you've finally found the cause behind your problems

 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Welcome!  You may have found the reasons for your fertility issues!  You only need one positive on the celiac panel to move forward.  Now, keep eating gluten and get a referral to a GI doctor.  The next step is an endoscopy to obtain intestinal biopsies.  

Open Original Shared Link

Why not just try going gluten free without a diagnosis?  I think you will receive better care and may uncover other issues that could affect a healthy pregnancy (e.g. Anemia, thyroid issues, etc.)  beside, celiac disease is genetic.  A firm diagnosis can help others in your family.  

I just met a woman in a 100% gluten free bakery a few months ago.  She told me that she had issues with conceiving and miscarrying.  Six months after being gluten free (strict), and she was pregnant.  Yep, she had the little guy with her!  I hope the best for you!

 

KAG1010 Newbie

Thank you both so much for your responses. I hope this is the answer. Unexplained infertility is really frustrating because you just keep hoping. But with a potential reason, hopefully I can adjust my diet and hopefully get pregnant! 

 

Thank you

Awol cast iron stomach Experienced

Emma 6 gave you great info on your test question.

I just wanted to say I am sorry for your losses . I hope that you are able to get the help and healing needed to move forward to better health and future conception. I look forward to the day you post that things are progressing in a positive way in your desire for a family.  I went through 3 pregnancies with what was likely undiagnosed celiac, I am a grateful mother that got to keep two on earth.

I have hope and best wishes for you.

Good luck.

Washingtonmama Contributor

My daughter was recently diagnosed, and her doctor agreed, Celiac could very well be the cause for her recurrent miscarriages. She is very excited to have found the problem. Looks like you are on the way to success! Whoohoo!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Florence Lillian's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Second chance

    3. - Scott Adams replied to elisejunker44's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Schar's products contain wheat!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,598
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Caroline Alexandria
    Newest Member
    Caroline Alexandria
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.