Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dr won't order endoscopy


blueskycloud

Recommended Posts

blueskycloud Newbie

Hello,

I'm hoping someone will be able to help. The short question is on how to convince my doctor of (or research on) the need for an endoscopy with negative blood work results...

The background: I'm in my late 30s, w annoying/severe digestive discomfort for more than a decade, which a GI a few years ago semi-diagnosed as IBS without doing any real investigation. More recently I've had debilitating fatigue, severe anxiety, and several other symptoms, and recently realized it could be celiac when talking to a friend who'd been diagnosed in his 40s last year.

My regular dr is usually quick and thorough in ordering tests. I asked her for celiac tests about 3 months ago, and they came back negative (the panel included: Deamidated Gliadin peptide Ab IgG, Tissue Transglutaminase Ab IgA, and total IgA).

At that point, I was so sick, didn't know when her referral to the GI would go through, and so decided to try going gluten-free. It's been a huge, dramatic change. I know that I shouldn't have stopped gluten before the full testing process, but I have a small child and had just gotten so fed up with being sick and didn't know whether it would be months and months longer to see GI.

Finally saw GI last week. Talked to her resident for some time, then she came in and immediately told me I have IBS, that there is absolutely no way I could have celiac with negative blood work. I knew that wasn't true, and I stood my ground, but she was dismissive and arrogant and completely refused to order a scope (and said that in her hospital it would be a 6 month waiting time anyway). I've been glutened a couple of times since going gluten-free 10 weeks ago and was far sicker than when eating gluten all the time, and for a week each time. Definitely can't do a gluten challenge.

So my problem is this: the GI said that my regular dr can order me an endoscopy, although it's not yet clear whether it'll be covered (I'm in Canada), but my reg dr is reluctant because she's deferring to the GI's opinion. She was open to ordering the scope if my genetic tests were positive, but getting the results is weeks away.

Basically, I want an endoscopy asap because in many places I've read that damage can take longer than 10 weeks to go away, but I don't want to wait months and have evidence gone. Does anyone have any research they could point me to illustrate the need for endoscopy w negative blood work? (I really like my reg dr for everything else, so don't want to change to a different one, and the GI appt took months to get, so finding another one isn't exactly an option right now because of the window of time since I stopped gluten.) In some ways I'm ok with having no diagnosis, since going gluten-free has literally given me hope that I didn't think I'd ever have, but I also have reasons (including my child's health) for wanting to know definitively...

Also, should I have also gotten ttg igg and Deamidated gliadin iga? The GI dr offered to do EMA now, but with a gluten challenge which I physically cannot do...

Many thanks!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

I can see their point that you don't have Celiac.  And you probably don't.  But something is going on and they need to find out what.  They should do a colonoscopy and maybe an endoscopy to see what IS wrong with you.  

You might look at FODMAPS issues  as those resolve gluten-free.

blueskycloud Newbie
17 minutes ago, kareng said:

I can see their point that you don't have Celiac.  And you probably don't.  But something is going on and they need to find out what.  They should do a colonoscopy and maybe an endoscopy to see what IS wrong with you.  

You might look at FODMAPS issues  as those resolve gluten-free.

Yeah, I've spent so long researching and trying different dietary changes in the past several years, including FODMAPS, which made no difference, unfortunately. Thanks for the idea, though!

blueskycloud Newbie

The only definitive point I've been able to find in research is Open Original Shared Link:

"If the suspicion of celiac disease is high, intestinal biopsy should be pursued even if serologies are negative."

cyclinglady Grand Master

This algorithm:

Open Original Shared Link

I am an odd diagnostic case.  I only have positives on the DGP IgA (even on follow-up testing) and a Marsh Stage IIIB biopsy result.  I am not IgA deficient.  

Karen is right.  Something is wrong.  

I could have sworn my niece had celiac disease, but she did not.  A pill camera caught her Crohn's diagnosis.   Just something to think about.  

Take care!  

 

ironictruth Proficient
6 hours ago, kareng said:

I can see their point that you don't have Celiac.  And you probably don't.  But something is going on and they need to find out what.  They should do a colonoscopy and maybe an endoscopy to see what IS wrong with you.  

You might look at FODMAPS issues  as those resolve gluten-free.

I agree here. Something is going on so why would they NOT do a scope?  When I met my first GI, he suggested I have the genetic test. 30-40% of the population has the gene, but if you do not, it pretty much excludes celiac. I remember saying "great" I would not need the endoscopy then, and he told me I still would, to examine why I was having issues.

Some algorithm's only use DGP IGG to catch IGA deficient folks. DGP is not as reliable as the internet would have you believe but is still far better then the older tests (my doc told me this and he is well aware of current studies). Both the IGA and IGG tests can be run as well as a combined IGA/IGG screen. But the results vary. I tested weak positive to the IGA a couple of times while on gluten. I then tested negative off of gluten but still positive to the combined screen. We are still trying to figure out if it is telling at all. Bottom line: Yes, they should have run DGP IGA. Not sure how you could make a serology negative argument if you failed to utilize the available serology????

I sought out a second opinion at Mass General in Boston.  They have a peds celiac disease center but can see adults. Both the initial physician who saw me to get established, and my current doc now (leading researcher in celiac disease), informed me 10-15% of celiacs are seronegative. In fact, we literally just discussed it again this week. My brother was reportedly seronegative for antibodies. Biopsy positive, gene positive, improvement on the diet and he gets sick if exposed. I am not entirely sure the DGP was even run for my brother either, as many docs just use TTG. He was just told he was seronegative.

Bottom line, you may need a doc who does not have a giant recall out on their model of the God complex.

Unfortunately, you probably should be eating gluten, even if just a cracker or two before bed, on a daily basis while you are trying to sort this out. Because you may not find a doc willing to biopsy for celiac unless you are eating it, and even if you do...you are approaching the 1/4 of a year mark. Some celiacs have almost minimal damage after a year on the diet. You may be hunting and waiting awhile longer. 

Get the genetic test if your insurance covers it. 

Good luck and keep us posted! 

blueskycloud Newbie

Thank you all! These resources are a huge help, especially the algorithm, which I think my GP will take quite seriously. I did have the genetic testing done, fortunately, and will get results back in about 3 weeks.

Wish I could eat a cracker here and there, ironictruth, but having any gluten makes me crazy sick. Kind of shot myself in the foot with going on GFD before endoscopy, I know. Yesterday I idiotically ate carrots that I'd accidentally grated on the sole cutting board we still have that has touched gluten (haven't been able to convince OH to give up bread at home), and am a mess today. Every time I've been gluttened so far, it's taken a week to recover, including 3-4 days where I can barely get out of bed. And I'm a stay-at-home parent to a toddler, so totally impossible to be laid up sick!

Thanks again, and I will check back in when I have any diagnosis info, to help others who might be in a similar situation in the future.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scuff Apprentice

hmm, if you feel that bad with a crumb, this may not be helpful. But, I've been able to build up to eating a bit of gluten, again for a gluten challenge. First time off gluten was horrible! Worse than any day pre-gluten free. But, I ate just a little bit of gluten every day, building up to one piece of bread a day. (taking a day off here and there when it got to be too unbearable.) I'm at almost 3 weeks back on gluten and trying to get it to two pieces without too much suffering. I'm not going to lie and say it's been awesome. I have a constant headache, can't think straight, and constipation, stomach ache, gas/bloating, etc all back. But, I've managed to mostly keep it to how I felt pre-gluten-free instead of how I felt the first time I was glutened post gluten-free. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Here is another thing to think about.  I was diagnosed 4 years ago, but hubby went Gluten Free some 16 years ago per the advice of my allergist and his PCP.  Guess what?  His symptoms resolved.  He would be the first to tell you that I have had way more support, but it is not enough to even contemplate doing a gluten challenge.   Does he have celiac disease?  Who knows? We do know that gluten makes him sick.  Science is just investigating gluten intolerances that are not actually celiac disease.  Unfortunately there is no test for a firm diagnosis.  

You have a small kid.  It would be nice to have a diagnosis, but you need to feel better so you can function.  Consider staying gluten-free.  If you suspect your kid having issues, then get him tested and insist on the full panel.  Make sure he is consuming gluten daily.  My home is gluten-free, but I make sure my kid eats gluten daily (lunch at school, etc.) for 12 weeks before a blood draw.  

Oh, other than GI upset, do you have some of the other risk factors for celiac disease?  I know I tested weird, but my doctor moved forward because I was anemic and already had another autoimmune disorder very common with celiac disease.  Plus, a heavy family history of autoimmune disorders.   If you do not have those other risk factors, I can see why your doctor would dismiss celiac disease.  

Open Original Shared Link

I wish you well.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.