Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused on test results


Deades

Recommended Posts

Deades Contributor

I did not have a blood test.  Had the scope looking for a stomach ulcer.  One doctor says I have celiac and another says no.  What do you think?

Here are the notes from my endoscopy:

Mild chronic duodenitis with mild to moderate villus blunting compatible with changes related to celiac disease in the appropriate clinical and endoscopic setting.  No dysplasia or malignancy identified.

Stomach Antrim biopsy:. Gastric mucosa with minimal inflammation. No dysplasia or malignancy identified.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

While it is a shame that your doctor did not order a celiac blood test (are you sure?), he did find villi damage.  This can occur for many reasons but the predominant one is celiac disease.  You were anemic and had osteoporosis at the time of your diagnosis.  It is too soon for to for a bone scan, but how is your anemia?  Improved on a gluten free diet?  That should confirm the diagnosis and set your mind at ease.

If you look at the history of celiac disease, biopsies came first, long before blood tests. 

Open Original Shared Link

 

 

Deades Contributor

There was no blood test for celiac because he was looking for a stomach ulcer.  Celiac was not even a thought at the time. I have always been anemic but my red blood cell count was also low.  I am scheduled to see the doctor in midSeptember and will have my first blood test to check on iron levels prior to that visit.

cyclinglady Grand Master

I have been anemic my entire life.  It was always blamed on my being a women and Thalassemia (genetic anemia), but I also had iron-deficiency anemia that waxed and waned.  Since I have been gluten-free for four years, my iron-deficiency anemia is long resolved!  I still have Thals, but my body has long adapted.   I am not ever going to win the Senior Olympics, but I can hold my own!  

My ferritin levels did go up with my three month check-up.  Since my hubby had been gluten-free for 12 years prior, I knew the diet well.  If your results are not perfect, give yourself more time.  The learning curve for the gluten-free diet is steep.  

It took much longer for other "hidden" issues to resolve (fractures, neuropathy, food intolerances, etc.).  

  • 3 weeks later...
ironictruth Proficient

Ok, I am looking through your old posts now after commenting on your recent one.

Ditto with cycling lady. Shame on them for not ordering the freaking celiac panel. Why would they not order it after the scope to confirm?

Will your insurance at least cover the genetic test? 30% of the population has the gene and only a small percentage develop celiac. However, at least you would know if you had a low or high risk gene. It might make you feel more confident in the diagnosis, especially having a doc tell you he thought the diagnosis of celiac was perhaps not correct.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,440
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.