Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood test vs. Biopsy - after a gluten free period


Lex-

Recommended Posts

Lex- Explorer

I know that going gluten free before getting tested means the blood test is going to yield a false negative, but the same can't be true of biopsy, can it? Especially if you have had undiagnosed celiac for a few years, I assume enough damage is caused to the intestines to show in biopsy. Am I right or wrong?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

You must do a gluten challenge for both the blood as well as the endoscopy. Sorry. 

Open Original Shared Link

Lex- Explorer
1 hour ago, squirmingitch said:

You must do a gluten challenge for both the blood as well as the endoscopy. Sorry. 

Open Original Shared Link

Thanks for your response.

 

Well, I am screwed then! 

cyclinglady Grand Master

You are not screwed.   If you experience a resolution of your symptoms while on a gluten free diet, then you have your answer — gluten is not good for you.  Just act as if you have celiac disease and you will be fine.  A firm diagnosis can be needed if you have DOUBT.  A diagnosis is nice to have (validation), but it really comes down to feeling better.  

It is hard to maintain a strict gluten free diet in the beginning, but soon it will become the norm.  

The small intestine can heal within two weeks in some people.  For others it can take longer.  It can be hard to master the diet is one reason for slow healing.    Others have collateral damage (celiac disease is systemic) and those issues take longer to resolve.  So, researchers are cautious about challenge lengths.  

But the decision is up to you as to whether or not you want to pursue a diagnosis.   You have to decide what is best for you.  

I do urge you  to throughly research and weigh the risks and benefits of self-diagnosing ANY disease.  I thought  for sure that my niece had celiac disease like me, but it turned out that she has Crohn’s.  But the people who wear white coats (although not perfect) really have an advantage over us — education and training.  

Lex- Explorer
24 minutes ago, cyclinglady said:

You are not screwed.   If you experience a resolution of your symptoms while on a gluten free diet, then you have your answer — gluten is not good for you.  Just act as if you have celiac disease and you will be fine.  A firm diagnosis can be needed if you have DOUBT.  A diagnosis is nice to have (validation), but it really comes down to feeling better.  

It is hard to maintain a strict gluten free diet in the beginning, but soon it will become the norm.  

The small intestine can heal within two weeks in some people.  For others it can take longer.  It can be hard to master the diet is one reason for slow healing.    Others have collateral damage (celiac disease is systemic) and those issues take longer to resolve.  So, researchers are cautious about challenge lengths.  

But the decision is up to you as to whether or not you want to pursue a diagnosis.   You have to decide what is best for you.  

I do urge you  to throughly research and weigh the risks and benefits of self-diagnosing ANY disease.  I thought  for sure that my niece had celiac disease like me, but it turned out that she has Crohn’s.  But the people who wear white coats (although not perfect) really have an advantage over us — education and training.  

Thanks for your response, cyclinglady.

I do feel better after going gluten free. It's been about a month and a half. My digestive system functions better. My joints pains have diminished. And the little eczema I had on my face has disappeared almost entirely.

But as you said it takes a while to get the hang of the diet. I have already accidentally glutenned myself a couple of times, with painful recurrence of the above mentioned symptoms.

One reason I would like a certain diagnosis is that I have had my symptoms for at least 5 years, and I have only recently realised they might have had to do with gluten all along. This means I might have already caused serious damage to my digestive system, and a biopsy can help determine that.

 

squirmingitch Veteran

Check out the Newbie 101 so you know how to protect yourself.

 

cyclinglady Grand Master

I read that getting diagnosed for celiac disease averages 10 years!  The good news is that most celiacs recover on the gluten free diet.  The biopsy in your case, could determine whether or not you have celiac disease and rule out  things like IBD, SIBO, Cancer, etc.  Cancer is very, very, rare.  If your symptoms resolve, your worries for intestinal damage should resolve too.  

My hubby is not diagnosed and he has been gluten free for 16 years (12 years longer than me).  He refuses to do a challenge and I can not blame him.  It is obvious that gluten is the cause of his symptoms.  It was a shame that back then, that celiac disease was not well known. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.