Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused about Endoscopy Results


lilly rose

Recommended Posts

lilly rose Newbie

My haematologist referred to me to have a colonoscopy and endoscopy due to being anaemic for many years.  The haematologist also tested for Vitamin D and Folate level.  I am deficient in Vitamin D and my folate levels are low.  The initial result of my endoscopy  indicated slightly atrophic duodenum (2nd part.) The doctor took biopsy from duodenum and terminal ileum.  I had a follow up appointment and the result came back normal.

I am confused about this. My doctor previously advised me not to eat gluten because or stomach pains and pains in joints. 

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
13 hours ago, lilly rose said:

My haematologist referred to me to have a colonoscopy and endoscopy due to being anaemic for many years.  The haematologist also tested for Vitamin D and Folate level.  I am deficient in Vitamin D and my folate levels are low.  The initial result of my endoscopy  indicated slightly atrophic duodenum (2nd part.) The doctor took biopsy from duodenum and terminal ileum.  I had a follow up appointment and the result came back normal.

I am confused about this. My doctor previously advised me not to eat gluten because or stomach pains and pains in joints. 

 

 

 

All celiac testing (blood tests and biopsies) require you to be on a full gluten diet.  It sounds like you might have already been gluten free when you had the endoscopy.  

Open Original Shared Link

I am confused.  You stated the the initial endoscopy results indicated “slightly atrophic duodenum”, but that the biopsy showed it was normal.  How many biopsies were taken?    A minimum of four to six usually required because damage from celiac disease can be patchy.  

lilly rose Newbie

Thank you for reply. 

When I had an initial blood test I wasn't eating gluten. 

However based on research online I realised I need to be eating gluten and I had before the endoscopy

I haven't received the report from the follow up. But based on the initial report that it stated that the endoscope was inserted to duodenum 2nd part. It was described as slightly atrophic looking. They took 4 pathological samples. 

I had a colonoscopy with 60-90 view. Endoscope were inserted to terminal ileum. They took 4 samples and sent to histology.

The consultant in my report said everything came back normal. 

plumbago Experienced
1 hour ago, lilly rose said:

Thank you for reply. 

When I had an initial blood test I wasn't eating gluten. 

However based on research online I realised I need to be eating gluten and I had before the endoscopy

I haven't received the report from the follow up. But based on the initial report that it stated that the endoscope was inserted to duodenum 2nd part. It was described as slightly atrophic looking. They took 4 pathological samples. 

I had a colonoscopy with 60-90 view. Endoscope were inserted to terminal ileum. They took 4 samples and sent to histology.

The consultant in my report said everything came back normal. 

Hi Lilly,

This is still confusing.

Have you had two endoscopies? Your narrative about the second one is what's confusing. Perhaps if you could clear up the timeline we can respond better.

Plumbago

cyclinglady Grand Master

It sounds like both your endoscopy and your colonoscopy were normal.  But what were they looking for or ruling  out as a source of your anemia  (celiac disease, cancer, inflammatory bowel disorder, etc)?  What kind of anemia do you have?  

Even on a gluten free diet, your anemia never resolved?  When did your doctor advise you to go gluten free originally?    How long was the gluten challenge before the endoscope?  

I am sorry that you have not found a source of your anemia.  Based on what you have told us, celiac disease can not be ruled out.   If your anemia and symptoms improved on a gluten free diet, consider staying on it.  No harm in that!  

 

 

lilly rose Newbie
On 2/25/2018 at 4:39 PM, cyclinglady said:

It sounds like both your endoscopy and your colonoscopy were normal.  But what were they looking for or ruling  out as a source of your anemia  (celiac disease, cancer, inflammatory bowel disorder, etc)?  What kind of anemia do you have?  

Even on a gluten free diet, your anemia never resolved?  When did your doctor advise you to go gluten free originally?    How long was the gluten challenge before the endoscope?  

I am sorry that you have not found a source of your anemia.  Based on what you have told us, celiac disease can not be ruled out.   If your anemia and symptoms improved on a gluten free diet, consider staying on it.  No harm in that!  

 

 

Thank you very much from your response. 

I had iron deficiency anaemia. 

My doctor asked me to follow a gluten free diet from November 2016. My blood seem to stabilise a bit but it drop when I got ill. 

I re-introduced  had a normal diet just before the test in January 2018. It did me stomach cramps and it my made my bowel movement odd and I weird odour. 

I am going to try and follow a gluten free diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.