Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab Results After Several Months Gluten-free


jnclelland

Recommended Posts

jnclelland Contributor

Has anyone had Enterolab testing after 8 or more months gluten-free, and if so, what did you think of the results? I finally decided to do the test after 8 months wheat-free and 4 months completely gluten-free. They came back negative - except for the gene test, which said I have one celiac-specific gene and one gene for non-celiac gluten sensitivity. But I've had such a positive response to the diet that I'm certain SOMETHING is going on with gluten for me, and I have no intention of ever eating gluten again. The main reason I was looking for a positive test was to have some ammunition for getting my mother to get tested, and possibly my kids as well.

My best guess is that if I do, in fact, have celiac, it was in the fairly early stages of symptoms when I went gluten-free. My main symptom prior to going gluten-free was eczema on my right hand and face (gradually worsening over the previous 9 years or so). But when I went off gluten, I noticed other things as well: not only did my eczema clear up, but my digestion got noticeably better. In retrospect, I'd say that I had been having frequent (3 or 4 a day), somewhat looser than normal stools for a few months before that, but they didn't really register with me until I stopped eating gluten and they firmed up and got less frequent. And I felt like a big rock in my stomach just went away; I felt "lighter" if that makes any sense. I also think my anxiety level has decreased, and I just feel better all-around.

Anyway, I'm wondering if negative-but-not-so-far-from-the-cutoff results after so long off gluten are really definitively negative, especially with the positive gene test. Here are my numbers:

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 7.5 (Normal Range <10 Units)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 5 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score 293 Units (Normal Range <300 Units)

Fecal anti-casein (cow’s milk) IgA antibody 4 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1 0302

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2 0301

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 3,3 (Subtype 8,7)

What do y'all think?

Jeanne


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rachel--24 Collaborator

It could be that you've been on the diet too long to show positive. It could be that you hadnt really suffered any damage yet....you caught it early enough. You may not have reached full blown-celiac but were smart to recognize a problem. I tested after 4 months gluten-free and was positive but I was extremely ill before the diet and was nowhere near healthy at the time of testing.

You can also email Dr. Fine at Enterolab and ask his opinion.

jnclelland Contributor
It could be that you've been on the diet too long to show positive. It could be that you hadnt really suffered any damage yet....you caught it early enough. You may not have reached full blown-celiac but were smart to recognize a problem. I tested after 4 months gluten-free and was positive but I was extremely ill before the diet and was nowhere near healthy at the time of testing.

You can also email Dr. Fine at Enterolab and ask his opinion.

That's a good idea! Do you have his email address? I can't find it on the Enterolab site, and the "contact us" form has a box that's about 10 x 10 characters, and I can't type anything legible in it.

Jeanne

Rachel--24 Collaborator
That's a good idea! Do you have his email address? I can't find it on the Enterolab site, and the "contact us" form has a box that's about 10 x 10 characters, and I can't type anything legible in it.

Jeanne

There must be a link on the website or something because I know alot of people from this site have sent them emails when they've had questions.

teankerbell Apprentice

My doctor says that tests aren't always accurate. He said that if I feel better on a gluten-free than there's my answer.

CMCM Rising Star
Has anyone had Enterolab testing after 8 or more months gluten-free, and if so, what did you think of the results? I finally decided to do the test after 8 months wheat-free and 4 months completely gluten-free. They came back negative - except for the gene test, which said I have one celiac-specific gene and one gene for non-celiac gluten sensitivity. But I've had such a positive response to the diet that I'm certain SOMETHING is going on with gluten for me, and I have no intention of ever eating gluten again. The main reason I was looking for a positive test was to have some ammunition for getting my mother to get tested, and possibly my kids as well.

My best guess is that if I do, in fact, have celiac, it was in the fairly early stages of symptoms when I went gluten-free. My main symptom prior to going gluten-free was eczema on my right hand and face (gradually worsening over the previous 9 years or so). But when I went off gluten, I noticed other things as well: not only did my eczema clear up, but my digestion got noticeably better. In retrospect, I'd say that I had been having frequent (3 or 4 a day), somewhat looser than normal stools for a few months before that, but they didn't really register with me until I stopped eating gluten and they firmed up and got less frequent. And I felt like a big rock in my stomach just went away; I felt "lighter" if that makes any sense. I also think my anxiety level has decreased, and I just feel better all-around.

Anyway, I'm wondering if negative-but-not-so-far-from-the-cutoff results after so long off gluten are really definitively negative, especially with the positive gene test. Here are my numbers:

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 7.5 (Normal Range <10 Units)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 5 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score 293 Units (Normal Range <300 Units)

Fecal anti-casein (cow’s milk) IgA antibody 4 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1 0302

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2 0301

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 3,3 (Subtype 8,7)

What do y'all think?

Jeanne

The 0302 gene is one of the celiac genes. Therefore, at the very least you have a predisposition to celiac. I'm guess your 0301 gene is a gluten sensitive one. So you seem to have an even higher predisposition to something going on with gluten, either now or in the future.

Your antigliadinIgA was "normal" and so was the Transglutaminase IgA. However, while Enterolab says they have detected reactions from people up to a year after going gluten free, perhaps there is a possibility that for you and your test, your period of no gluten was just too long to show reactions. Your fecal fat score at 293 was pretty darn close to the 300 limit of normal. My score, for example, was 64 on that one, despite the fact that I had high scores on the other tests.

A strong response to a gluten free diet is not something to ignore. With your genes and your already present physical symptoms, you would be well served by a completely gluten free diet. Give it a lengthy trial and see what happens to your symptoms and see how you feel.

I'd also encourage you to write Phylllis at Enterolab....she is wonderful about explaining things regarding your test results. Did you get emailed results? Just reply to that email and your question will go to Phyllis. In case you need the address again, here it is:

enterolabresults@earthlink.net

jnclelland Contributor
A strong response to a gluten free diet is not something to ignore. With your genes and your already present physical symptoms, you would be well served by a completely gluten free diet. Give it a lengthy trial and see what happens to your symptoms and see how you feel.

I'd also encourage you to write Phylllis at Enterolab....she is wonderful about explaining things regarding your test results. Did you get emailed results? Just reply to that email and your question will go to Phyllis. In case you need the address again, here it is:

enterolabresults@earthlink.net

Thanks for the email address! My results were emailed to me, but from an email address that didn't accept replies. I managed to get in touch with Phyllis by using the contact form on the web site and asking if there was an email address where I could write to someone.

I definitely plan to stay on the gluten-free diet in any case. I never knew I could feel this good, and I don't miss gluten anywhere near enough to give up how I feel just to be able to eat it again. Not to mention for prevention of future problems: my grandmother has three separate conditions associated with gluten intolerance, so I wasn't at all surprised to get a positive result from the gene test. A firmer diagnosis would have been nice, but I'm perfectly happy to stay on the diet without one!

Jeanne


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.