Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enforcement Of Labelling Laws

kari

Recommended Posts

kari Apprentice
kari
Posted

It is my understanding, through reading posts on this board, that the new labelling laws went into effect january 1, 2006 and require companies to state clearly if a product contains any of the major allergens. I was quite familiar, even before being diagnosed with celiac, with seeing these warnings since I have always been a label reader, and I was used to seeing things like contains wheat, or contains milk, in capital bold print under the ingredients. I understand that companies are allowed to use up their old labels, but here's my situation that made me think of this in the first place - for instance, I used to drink weight watchers smoothies. I have a practice where if i see any allergen listed at all, I know the company is doing it. If nothing is listed, then you have no way of knowing if there are no allergens, or if they just haven't updated the labels yet. In that case, I look for something from the same company that clearly contains milk, and if it doesn't say contains milk, then i don't trust them. so... with the smoothie mix, i was disapointed that they hadn't updated, but it's a product they've had for a while, so it made sense that they wouldn't have made the total transition yet. I emailed them to ask about the ingredients, and got the run around from them 4 or 5 times. After clearly stating that I purchased many of their products, and had celiac disease, and explained gluten and the forms of it that I can not have, I got an ignorant response about a product that wasn't even the one I had asked about in the first place (or even similar), which said it 'did not contain wheat gluten, but MAY contain oats, barley, or rye, and therefore was suitable for celiacs' - i was irate at their ignorance, lack of detail, and refusal to listen to something I had clearly explained 5 times at this point. ESPECIALLY since this is a weight loss company - food, ingredients, etc. are supposedly their specialty. I found out later, by posting each of the 8 million ingredients in this product on this site, that the smoothies do not have gluten, but by principle and the way my question was answered, I have lost respect for this company and do not want to support them by purchasing their products.

So, I was in the grocery store today and saw that Weight Watchers has a new yogurt. It clearly did not exist before the new labelling laws went into effect, so there would be no reason to use up old packaging, since it is a brand new product. Obviously yogurt is a milk containing product, and thus should carry the bold type that states CONTAINS MILK per the labelling laws, so I was curious to check it out - of course, once again, long list of undecipherable chemical sounding ingredients that I can't imagine could all fit in one tiny cup of yogurt - but no allergen warning.

I wonder how many other companies are doing this? can they get away with just blatantly disregarding this new rule? What are the limits and restrictions? How is it enforced? How can we help it be enforced? Just as I was getting excited about how the new rules for labelling would make my life one giant step easier, this is a giant frustration to me (and i'm assuming everyone here) because now we're all back to step one, where we can't trust any product without a phd in ingredient deciphering it seems.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


lovegrov Collaborator
lovegrov
Posted

Did the yogurt list milk in the ingredients? If so, that's all they needed to do. The CONTAINS: "whatever" is not required.

richard

kari Apprentice
kari
Posted
  • Author
Did the yogurt list milk in the ingredients? If so, that's all they needed to do. The CONTAINS: "whatever" is not required.

richard

that's exactly my point - obviously yogurt contains milk - but at the bottom, it doesn't say 'contains milk', which means if it contains wheat, or anything else that is an allergen, they aren't printing it on the label the way they are supposed to

penguin Community Regular
penguin
Posted
that's exactly my point - obviously yogurt contains milk - but at the bottom, it doesn't say 'contains milk', which means if it contains wheat, or anything else that is an allergen, they aren't printing it on the label the way they are supposed to

I think you're kind of missing the point. These are the ingredients for Dannon fruit on the bottom blueberry yogurt (example only):

Ingredients:

Cultured grade A lowfat milk, blueberries, sugar, fructose syrup, high fructose corn syrup, contains less than 1% of modified corn starch, pectin, kosher gelatin, sodium phosphate, malic acid, natural flavor, calcium phosphate. Contains active yogurt cultures including L. acidophilus.

Because milk is explicitly labeled in the ingredient statement, they don't have to have the "contains: milk" statement, because duh, milk has milk in it.

But say your sour cream and onion potato chips list "whey" as an ingredient, they would have to put the "contains: milk" statement at the bottom, because whey isn't explicit.

Pick up a bag of wheat flour and read the ingredients, I bet it doesn't say "contains: wheat" at the bottom, because it's explicitly named in the ingredient statement.

Hope that clears things up :)

mmaccartney Explorer
mmaccartney
Posted
But say your sour cream and onion potato chips list "whey" as an ingredient, they would have to put the "contains: milk" statement at the bottom, because whey isn't explicit.

OR they can list it buried in the ingredients as:

Blueberries, sugar, fructose syrup, whey (milk), high fructose corn syrup, contains less than 1% of modified corn starch, pectin, kosher gelatin, sodium phosphate, malic acid, natural flavor, calcium phosphate.

I'm only boldfacing it to highlight, the manufactorer does not have to highlight it.

Susan123 Rookie
Susan123
Posted

So let me get this straight because I was having problems with it to... If it is not listed after contains:.... then it will say in the ingredients wheat not modified food starch or something hidden.

gabby Enthusiast
gabby
Posted

Just a note on getting answers when you phone/e-mail a company (and I mean ANY type of company)

If you don't get anywhere with the customer service people, then try this: find out the contact information for someone in the Media Relations department. And then e-mail them about the not-very-nice responses you've been getting from customer service. And restate you inital question. Media relations people tend to be more in-tune with the needs and desires of their customers. Everytime I've tried this, the media relations person is horrified, apologetic, and then quite helpful. And they are usually really friendly too.

hope this helps,

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


lovegrov Collaborator
lovegrov
Posted

Here's my understanding:

If a product contains one of the eight top allergens (fish, seafood, peanuts, tree nuts, wheat, dairy, soy or eggs) or one of the allergens is used in processing, that allergen must be clearly listed in some way. If the manufacturer wants to put CONTAINS: WHEAT at the bottom they can do that. If they want to put it in the ingredient list, they can do that. They don't have to do both. If the ingredients say modified food starch but wheat isn't listed anywhere, then the MFS is from something else like corn, potato, tapioca. I've never heard of modified barley or rye starch.

I think it's always a bad idea just to look at the CONTAINS statement even if it has one. If you do that, you might miss the oats or malt flavor in the ingredients list.

richard

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted

I agree with Richard--always best to read the whole label. On a related note, I bought a box of My T Fine butterscotch pudding last weekend. It had 'modified food starch' listed in the ingredients. No allergens listed--an older box, I'm sure. Anyway, I called and the butterscotch flavor is NOT gluten-free. So, even with the new law, I think it's wise to read the entire label, and if there are no allergens listed, continue to call because all of the old packaging is not off the shelves yet.

Merika Contributor
Merika
Posted

I had a rep at a company tell me it was November 2006 that the labelling laws go into effect.

All disclaimers,

Merika

kari Apprentice
kari
Posted
  • Author

i understand what you're saying... the specific flavor I looked at (I don't rememeber which one, it was the first one I reached for on the shelf) had a long long list of chemically sounding ingredient names, none of which was 'milk' or any variation thereof. 0bviously, being yogurt, at least one of those ingredients is a milk product, but none said that they were. and there was no 'contains: milk' etc on the label. long story short - i once again emailed / called the company and got the run around several times over - decided to chance it at ate the yogurt a few times since, hey, it's yogurt, it should be gluten free, right? And was sick for almost a full week after. thank you, weight watchers, for refusing to answer my question.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,553
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Jennifer CCC
    Newest Member
    Jennifer CCC
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Taken Seriously

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Your post demonstrates the profound frustration and isolation that so many in the Celiac community feel, and I want to thank you for channeling that experience into advocacy. The medical gaslighting you endured for decades is an unacceptable and, sadly, a common story, and the fact that you now have to "school" your own GI specialist speaks volumes about the critical lack of consistent and updated education. Your idea to make Celiac Disease a reportable condition to public health authorities is a compelling and strategic one. This single action would force the system to formally acknowledge the prevalence and seriousness of the disease, creating a concrete dataset that could drive better research funding, shape medical school curricula, and validate the patient experience in a way that individual stories alone often cannot. It is an uphill battle, but contacting representatives, as you have done with Adam Gray, is exactly how change begins. By framing it as a public health necessity—a matter of patient safety and protection from misdiagnosis and neglect—you are building a powerful case. Your voice and your perseverance, forged through thirty years of struggle, are exactly what this community needs to ensure that no one else has to fight so hard just to be believed and properly cared for.
    • Scott Adams
      Looking for a gluten-free roomie in Denver CO

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I had no idea there is a "Louisville" in Colorado!😉 I thought it was a typo because I always think of the Kentucky city--but good luck!
    • Scott Adams
      Allergy medication: cetirizine by the HealthA2Z is it gluten free?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Navigating medication safety with Celiac disease can be incredibly stressful, especially when dealing with asthma and severe allergies on top of it. While I don't have personal experience with the HealthA2Z brand of cetirizine, your caution is absolutely warranted. The inactive ingredients in pills, known as excipients, are often where gluten can be hidden, and since the FDA does not require gluten-free labeling for prescription or over-the-counter drugs, the manufacturer's word is essential. The fact that you cannot get a clear answer from Allegiant Health is a significant red flag; a company that is confident its product is gluten-free will typically have a customer service protocol to answer that exact question. In situations like this, the safest course of action is to consider this product "guilty until proven innocent" and avoid it. A better alternative would be to ask your pharmacist or doctor to help you identify a major national brand of cetirizine (like Zyrtec) whose manufacturer has a verified, publicly stated gluten-free policy for that specific medication. It's not worth the risk to your health when reliable, verifiable options are almost certainly available to you. You can search this site for USA prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
    • Scott Adams
      Protein or fat?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      What you're describing is indeed familiar to many in the Celiac community, especially in the early stages of healing. When the intestinal villi are damaged from Celiac disease, they struggle to properly digest and absorb fats, a condition known as bile acid malabsorption. This can cause exactly the kind of cramping and spasms you're seeing, as undigested fats can irritate the sensitive gut lining. It is highly plausible that her reactions to dairy and eggs are linked to their higher fat content rather than the proteins, especially since she tolerates lean chicken breast. The great news is that for many, this does improve with time. As her gut continues to heal on a strict gluten-free diet, her ability to produce the necessary enzymes and bile to break down fats should gradually return, allowing her to slowly tolerate a wider variety of foods. It's a slow process of healing, but your careful approach of focusing on low-fat, nutrient-dense foods like seeds and avocado is providing her system the best possible environment to recover. Many people with celiac disease, especially those who are in the 0-2 year range of their recovery, have additional food intolerance issues which could be temporary. To figure this out you may need to keep a food diary and do an elimination diet over a few months. Some common food intolerance issues are dairy/casein, eggs, corn, oats, and soy. The good news is that after your gut heals (for most people who are 100% gluten-free this will take several months to two years) you may be able to slowly add some these items back into your diet after the damaged villi heal. This article may be helpful: Thank you for sharing your story—it's a valuable insight for other parents navigating similar challenges.
    • Beverage
      Diagnosed celiac for 1-2 months ago and everything makes me bloated.

      By Beverage · Posted

      I had a very rough month after diagnosis. No exaggeration, lost so much inflammatory weight, I looked like a bag of bones, underneath i had been literally starving to death. I did start feeling noticeably better after a month of very strict control of my kitchen and home. What are you eating for breakfast and lunch? I ignored my doc and ate oats, yes they were gluten free, but some brands are at the higher end of gluten free. Lots of celics can eat Bob's Red Mill gluten-free oats, but not me. I can now eat them, but they have to be grown and processed according to the "purity protocol" methods. I mail order them, Montana Gluten-Free brand. A food and symptoms and activities log can be helpful in tracking down issues. You might be totally aware, but I have to mention about the risk of airborne gluten. As the doc that diagnosed me warned . . Remember eyes, ears, nose, and mouth all lead to your stomach and intestines.  Are you getting any cross contamination? Airborne gluten? Any pets eating gluten (they eat it, lick themselves, you pet them...)? Any house remodeling? We live in an older home, always fixing something. I've gotten glutened from the dust from cutting into plaster walls, possibly also plywood (glues). The suggestions by many here on vitamin supplements also really helped me. I had some lingering allergies and asthma, which are now 99% gone. I was taking Albuterol inhaler every hour just to breathe, but thiamine in form of benfotiamine kicked that down to 1-2 times a day within a few days of starting it. Also, since cutting out inflammatory seed oils (canola, sunflower, grapeseed, etc) and cooking with real olive oil, avocado oil, ghee, and coconut oil, I have noticed even greater improvement overall and haven't used the inhaler in months! It takes time to weed out everything in your life that contains gluten, and it takes awhile to heal and rebuild your health. At first it's mentally exhausting, overwhelming, even obsessive, but it gets better and second nature.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.