Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Does this also seem incorrect to you guys?


Randommuwa

Recommended Posts

Randommuwa Apprentice

I have positive blood work, negative biopsy. Today was the first time I talked to my GI about the biopsy results and she tried to say my biopsy "proved" I didn't have celiacs. Which is already wrong itself, it can only confirm I have it, not that I don't. She said if I wanted to continue to pursue looking into it that we could. She said we can do genetic testing and that would "prove" if I had it or not..... Which also isn't right... 

 

I had to tell her to redo blood work (with a complete metabolic panel this time because she didn't do that the first time) just so when it comes back positive for the second time maybe she'd be more convinced it wasn't false. Is there anything else I should do? Do I just need a different doctor? She doesn't seem to understand her own field of work and the tests associated. 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



frieze Community Regular

I vote a new doc.

Scott Adams Grand Master

It definitely sounds like your doctor needs to read up on the protocols for celiac disease screening. Can you share your blood test results with us, along with the cut off levels for a positive test? I wonder if a second blood test is necessary, but be sure to keep eating gluten until all testing is finished, otherwise you may end up with false negative results. 

Randommuwa Apprentice
2 minutes ago, Scott Adams said:

It definitely sounds like your doctor needs to read up on the protocols for celiac disease screening. Can you share your blood test results with us, along with the cut off levels for a positive test? I wonder if a second blood test is necessary, but be sure to keep eating gluten until all testing is finished, otherwise you may end up with false negative results. 

Yeah I've kept eating gluten to make sure my results are accurate. 

 

Blood work results:

Endomysial Abs (IgA):

Negative 

 

Gliadin Ab, IgA (Deamidated):

My Value: 21.4 U (Weak positive 20.0-30.0)

Standard Range: <20.0 (Negative) U

 

Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Ab: 

My Value: 5.7 U/mL (Weak Positive 4.0-10.0)

Standard Range: <4.0 (Negative) U/mL 

 

IgA: 

My Value: 234 mg/dL

Standard Range: 61 - 356 mg/dL

Scott Adams Grand Master

To me it looks like the most important test was positive: Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Ab, even though it is a "weak positive" it is still positive. If your doctor is willing to re-run the blood panel it may make sense to do it again, and you need to keep eating about 2 sliced of wheat bread daily for at least 6-8 weeks before the test, and at least 2 weeks before a biopsy.

If you think a positive celiac disease test will help you stay on a gluten-free diet, then it would make sense to get the diagnosis. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,484
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Miaokang
    Newest Member
    Miaokang
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      It looks like their most recent clinical trial just finished up on 5-22-2025.
    • Fabrizio
      Dear Scott,  please check the link https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05574010?intr=KAN-101&rank=1 What do you think about it?
    • Scott Adams
      KAN‑101 is still very much in development and being actively studied. It has not been dropped—rather, it is advancing through Phases 1 and 2, moving toward what could become the first disease‑modifying treatment for celiac disease. https://anokion.com/press_releases/anokion-announces-positive-symptom-data-from-its-phase-2-trial-evaluating-kan-101-for-the-treatment-of-celiac-disease/ 
    • knitty kitty
      Thiamine interacts with all the other B vitamins.  Thiamine and B 6 make a very important enzyme together. With more thiamine and other vitamins available from the supplements your body is absorbing the ones you need more of.  The body can control which vitamins to absorb or not.  You're absorbing more and it's being transported through the blood.   It's common to have both a Thiamine and a Pyridoxine deficiency.  Keep taking the B Complex. This is why it's best to stop taking supplements for six to eight weeks before testing vitamin levels.  
    • badastronaut
      Yes I took a supplement that had B6 in it, low dosage though. I've stopped taking that. B1 doesn't affect other B vitamin levels? 
×
×
  • Create New...