Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Doctors-worth It?


Idahogirl

Recommended Posts

Idahogirl Apprentice

It seems like I am constantly being told by other doctors (ob/gyn, dermatologist) that I should be seeing a GI doctor, or in the case of my pregnancy, they recommended a nutritionist. I've been down this road, and it seems like a waste of time and money. If I'm doing the diet, why do I need to pay money to go tell a guy that everything's going fine. Shouldn't doctors be there for when there is something wrong and you need help?

Has anyone that has been doing the gluten free diet benefited from seeing a nutritionist? My preg. doctor keeps mentioning it, but I have a feeling that they are going to tell me what I already know, and give me lists I already have. When I first got diagnosed, my GI sent me to one, and she knew nothing. I hadn't even started the diet, and I could walk circles around her with all my knowledge.

It seems to me like doctors sometimes have an overinflated sense of self-importance. Like we need them in order to survive properly. What is the benefit in an appointment where the doctor just wants to make sure everything is still going okay? How about I'll call him if everything ISN'T going okay???

Agree? Disagree?

Lisa


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



debbiewil Rookie

Well, one thing you DON'T want to do when you are sick is find a new doctor. You should have one or two that you like, and checked out when you were feeling well. For instance, if you think you may need a GI, say to do an endo in a couple of years to make sure everything looks well healed and there's no villi damage, then now or some other time when you are feeling good is the time to check one out, meet with him and make sure his manner and attitude work for you, that he's knowledgeable about celiac, etc. If you do have problems, maybe develop other food intollerances or something, you don't want to have to start searching and take the first doctor who can fit you in, who may know nothing about you or your disease. Like you wouldn't want to look in the phone book for a pediatritian when the baby's sick, you should have a doctor or two that you've established relationships with while you are feeling great, just in case you do need them someday. And you probably don't need EVERY kind a doctor, just a GP and maybe another that you like and trust who understands your needs.

Debbie

cornbread Explorer

I think in general there's a grave misconception amoung the gluten-eating public (including doctors) that a gluten-free diet must be somehow unbalanced, or at least unhealthily restrictive. I honestly don't think anything could be further from the truth! I've had people suggest nutritionists to me, and I find it quite insulting because my diet (Paleolithic - just fresh organic meat, fish, fruit, veggies and nuts) is WAY healthier than their typical modern diets. Bar special occasions, I eat zero junk food and provided I don't get cross-contaminated I am way healthier than they are too with more energy. Maybe they're just jealous because they're addicted to gluten and sugar? :ph34r:

Anyway, I think you are giving your baby a great start in life and you're right, doctors really don't like it when we diagnose or fix ourselves! A good doctor would tell you to just keep doing what you're doing.

StrongerToday Enthusiast

I saw a nutrionist, she's a good friend of my mom. Her daughter also has Celiac so she was very helpful and gave me lots of newbie info. If your insurnace would pay for it, then I'd say it couldn't hurt!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,659
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dr. Gunn
    Newest Member
    Dr. Gunn
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Dr. Gunn
      Exactly! Negative genetics can rule out celiac disease with close to 100% certainty. It takes tTg antibody testing and biopsy confirm the diagnosis in a genetically susceptible individual. 
    • trents
      What Dr. Gunn states is essentially true. It is a rule out measure. But be aware that to possess either of the two primary genes that have been identified with celiac disease (or both) doesn't necessarily mean that you have or will develop celiac disease. Almost 40% of the general population carries one or both but only about 1% of the general population will develop active celiac disease. It remains latent until triggered by some stress event which may or may not occur. So, there is a genetic component to celiac disease but there is also an epigenetic component. 
    • Dr. Gunn
      Have you had celiac genetic risk testing? A celiac genetic test is accurate with or without gluten in your diet. If you don't carry the celiac risk genes you can effectively rule out celiac disease for life. 
    • Scott Adams
      Based on those results alone, it’s not possible to say you have celiac disease. The test that is usually most specific for celiac, tTG-IgA, is negative in your results, and the endomysial antibody (EMA) is also negative, which generally argues against active celiac disease. However, your deamidated gliadin IgA is elevated, and your total IgA level is also high, which can sometimes affect how the other antibody tests behave. Another important factor is that you were reducing gluten before the test, which can lower antibody levels and make the results less reliable. Because of that, many doctors recommend a gluten challenge (eating gluten regularly for several weeks) before repeating blood tests or considering an endoscopy if symptoms and labs raise concern. It would be best to review these results with a gastroenterologist, who can interpret them in context and decide whether further testing is needed.
    • trents
      Since you compromised the validity of the antibody testing by experimenting with gluten withdrawal ahead of the testing, you are faced with two options: 1. Reintroduce significant amounts of gluten into your diet for a period of weeks, i.e., undertake a "gluten challenge". The most recent guidelines are the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat-based bread) for at least two weeks leading up to the day of testing. Note: I would certainly give it more than two weeks to be sure. 2. Be willing to live with the ambiguity of not knowing whether gluten causes you problems because you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). There is no test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out and we have tests for it. Celiac disease has an autoimmune base. NCGS does not. GI symptoms overlap. In the early stages of celiac disease, other body systems may not be showing stress or damage so, symptomatically, it would be difficult to distinguish between celiac disease and NCGS. Both conditions require elimination of gluten from the diet for symptom relief. Some experts feel that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.