Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Bmi?

skinnyminny

Recommended Posts

skinnyminny Enthusiast
skinnyminny
Posted

I am 5"7 and 105 and that makes my BMI ( body mass index) 16.5. I was wondering if anyone is familar with these types of measurements? Are they takin into consideration everything? The number above suggests I am really underweight.. I think the normal is 18. My genetics are naturally prone to be thin, but does this suggests I am dangerously underweight. I eat at least 2,000 calories a day and am over all pretty healthy.. I just wanted someone elses opinion on the whole BMI thing.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

BMI is not accurate for the very athletic, and is only an approximation, but 105lbs at 5'7" IS definitely underweight. If you're concerned (and there could be good reason - being underweight brings its own health issues), you should talk to your doctor about finding what *your* idea weight is. While it is almost certainly higher than 105lbs, and is likely to be somewhere around 125-130lbs, averages you find on the internet or in a book just aren't going to take your family history and yourself as an individual into account. (Of course, doctors aren't always that helpful with this sort of thing...)

skinnyminny Enthusiast
skinnyminny
Posted
  • Author

Yea Ive never weighed more than 115 in my life but with this type of diet it is hard to keep the pounds on I guess a more accurate reading would be a bod pod or something, I know 105 is underweight but the last time I went to the doctor they werent too conserned but it worries me alittle, I worry I wont be able to get pregnat on down the road.

queenofhearts Explorer
queenofhearts
Posted
Yea Ive never weighed more than 115 in my life but with this type of diet it is hard to keep the pounds on I guess a more accurate reading would be a bod pod or something, I know 105 is underweight but the last time I went to the doctor they werent too conserned but it worries me alittle, I worry I wont be able to get pregnat on down the road.

I think BMI is way inaccurate.

Just to reassure you, I am 5'8" & when I got preggers I weighed around 105. I had twins & gained nearly half again my weight during pregnancy! I looked like a potato with toothpicks stuck into it! But no serious complications. (I did have ferocious, nonstop nausea for the first few months, but got over it eventually & the babies were healthy & good-sized for twins. And this was when I was clueless & eating gluten, so you'll probably be healthier.)

So long as you have fairly good energy & your period is reasonably regular, you are probably okay. But if you are very fatigued or missing a lot of months, that is a sign that something's amiss, & gaining weight can definitely help.

By the way, my kids are 19 now & I weigh 127... & sometimes I miss my string bean days!

Leah

CarlaB Enthusiast
CarlaB
Posted

The BMI does not take into account muscle vs. fat. The only use it has is so you can see how your weight compares to the weight of someone a different height. As tarnalberry said, it's especially off for the athletic. If you have a guy who is a body builder and has the same BMI as a guy who is just plain overweight, I don't think it would be accurate to tell the bodybuilder he's obese!

You could stand to gain a little, but I know you've mentioned trying in other threads.

BRUMI1968 Collaborator
BRUMI1968
Posted

Another thing the BMI doees not take into account, though this matters more to those with high BMI, is WHERE you store your fat. That's why the waist to hip ratio is often considered better, or at least required to make good sense out of BMI.

Being underweight makes you more susceptible to osteoperosis, so adding weight-bearing exercise like liftiin weights will help. Other weight-bearing exercise like walking, yoga, etc. won't work as well if you are thin.

I'm 5'8-1/2 and weigh 130 - and according to the charts that's a bit underweight, but I don't feel underweight at all. I also carry it low - on the top I look super skinny, but on the hips and thighs I look pretty normal. I think one key for me is that no matter what I eat or don't eat at this point, I never wander more than three or four pounds over the course of a day - I'm damned near always 129-132 in the a.m. I think this means that it must be about my proper weight. Just my philosophy.

Good luck.

-Sherri

skinnyminny Enthusiast
skinnyminny
Posted
  • Author

Thanks for the help all of you, I know I have mentioned tryin to gain in previous threads, and I just want to make sure I am healthy is all that matters to me, I was just playin around on Web Md's site and realized that my BMI was relatively low. My mom tells me my metabolism with eventually slow down and I will gain I have been trying for at least 7 months but Ill keep on trying!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


BRUMI1968 Collaborator
BRUMI1968
Posted

I wonder how old you are. I once had bronchitis for like six months and got down to 100 pounds (at 5'8-1/2). Man I could not gain that weight back. I drank protein drinks, ate like crazy, etc. I looked awful. But then something remarkable happened - I turned 22. Then I didn't seem to have any problems...thighs, butt, oh yeah, they were absorbing fat. The next thing you know I'm 140 pounds. What is the magic age, 24 years old or something?

skinnyminny Enthusiast
skinnyminny
Posted
  • Author

Yea I think time will take its toll on me, I am only 19 now.. so I am sure all this eating will catch up with me!

CarlaB Enthusiast
CarlaB
Posted
Yea I think time will take its toll on me, I am only 19 now.. so I am sure all this eating will catch up with me!

You age is probably part of the problem with not gaining weight. Don't worry, you might actually have to watch it someday!! I'm 43, 5'7 1/2" and looked horrible at 121. But when I was your age, I looked GREAT at that weight and even preferred to weight a little less than that. I would have been mortified if I got up to 131 back then, but now I consider it my ideal weight. If you're feeling healthy, I wouldn't worry too much about it.

Felidae Enthusiast
Felidae
Posted

I am runway model tall and skinny, and have been this way my whole life. I am in my early thirties and according to the bmi, I am underweight. I eat constantly and I am fit. Nothing that I do enables me to gain weight. So, I don't how accurate they are. One good thing, since I work in the bush, the bears and cougars will go for my coworkers before me. LOL

eKatherine Apprentice
eKatherine
Posted

To a great extent they have made arbitrary decisions where to draw the line. There are plenty of people who don't fit into the framework. Even among the perfectly healthy, there are lots of people who are just plain thin, and stay that way all their lives. For them it is as hard to gain weight and keep it on as it is for hefty people to lose it and keep it off.

A while back I read an article by a writer who was extremely skinny. She went though a special program where the participants were told to eat their meat first, then the vegetables, and only if they were still hungry did they get to eat the bread. It's not just calories you need to eat more of. Protein will tend to put on muscle, carbs and fat can only be used for energy or fat deposits.

skinnyminny Enthusiast
skinnyminny
Posted
  • Author

I do beilive some people are prone to be thin, I do not try at all and really it doesnt bother me until some one points out how tiny I am, but really I have a real thin frame. I eat protein for almost every meal and try to incorporate more gluten free carbs and lots of nuts. It just worries me sometimes when I realize I am "Underweight" but in reality I consider my self healthy.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By Judy M · Posted

      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free beer ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.