Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do People Who Have True Celiac - Not Gluten Intolerance


Guest cassidy

Recommended Posts

Guest cassidy

I had my blood test and went gluten-free the same day. The results were negative, but by the time I got them I felt so much better that I didn't really care. I was also having an endoscopy for another reason and asked them to check for celiac. I got the endoscopy results and they didn't mention anything about the biopsies, and I didn't ask, so I assumed they were fine.

My question is, does anyone that has true celiac, not gluten intolerance or sensitivity, or any other type of problem with gluten, ever have a negative blood test if they have been eating gluten for years before getting the test? I know the test isn't always accurate because people who test negative may still have a HUGE problem with gluten, like I do, but does that automatically mean we have some other gluten problem than celiac if we have had our symptoms for years and been eating gluten for years?

I had symptoms for 29 years so I would think that if I was going to have intestinal damage that I would have had it by now. I realize this doesn't make any practical difference because there is not way I will ever willingly poison myself, but I'm just curious.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Cassidy:

I really don't understand your question. I had a endoscopy exam and biopsy which indicated Celiac with blutting of the villi, and after a two month period of being gluten free, a NEW doctor wanted to see what a Celiac Panel looked like, and of course it was negative. So, therefore, he is doubtful. (who cares!)

I know that I did not answer your questions, but help me out, so I can try. (not you, I am sure it's me).

key Contributor

My GI doctor told me that people that have IBS, will be helped by a gluten free diet. Even without having celiac disease. I don't think that gluten is that good for people that don't have celiac disease. It is highly processed and unless you are eating spelt bread, then it is pretty much not good for you.

I think in children, tests can definitely be negative and they can have celiac disease. My son's tests were negative at 14 months, but his Igg was positive. He never had the biopsy, so I don't know about that.

I know like the person that posted before me, if you are gluten free, then it is highly likely that your tests would be inaccurate. The goal is to have them return to normal.

I am not sure I am giving you an answer and I think there may be some stuff doctors don't know yet about testing. If you feel better, then stick with it.

Monica

Nancym Enthusiast

Gluten can attack the skin or brain and often those people have no detectable blood results and no villious atrophy.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
My GI doctor told me that people that have IBS, will be helped by a gluten free diet. Even without having celiac disease.

IBS is not a disease, it is a syndrome--a collection of symptoms. Those symptoms are pretty much identical to those of--you guessed it--celiac.

Guest cassidy
Cassidy:

I really don't understand your question. I had a endoscopy exam and biopsy which indicated Celiac with blutting of the villi, and after a two month period of being gluten free, a NEW doctor wanted to see what a Celiac Panel looked like, and of course it was negative. So, therefore, he is doubtful. (who cares!)

I know that I did not answer your questions, but help me out, so I can try. (not you, I am sure it's me).

Let me try to re-phrase. Let's say I've been eating gluten my entire life and I have had celiac-type symptoms for years. I take the blood test and it is negative. Is there anyway that I still have celiac? I realize that people who are gluten intolerant/sensitive/or whatever you want to call it still have huge problems with gluten, but don't have positive blood tests because they don't have classic celiac damage.

So, I guess the question is can a celiac eat gluten for years and years and have a negative blood test while they are still on a gluten filled diet?

Jestgar Rising Star
So, I guess the question is can a celiac eat gluten for years and years and have a negative blood test while they are still on a gluten filled diet?

Cassidy,

there isn't really a clear answer to this. Although a person may not have visible damage on the upper portion of their intestine, there's no reasonable way to check farther into the intestine. It's like making a conclusion about the ending of a book when you're 1/3 into it. A lot of times you can figure out the ending, but not always.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nikki-uk Enthusiast
Let me try to re-phrase. Let's say I've been eating gluten my entire life and I have had celiac-type symptoms for years. I take the blood test and it is negative. Is there anyway that I still have celiac? I realize that people who are gluten intolerant/sensitive/or whatever you want to call it still have huge problems with gluten, but don't have positive blood tests because they don't have classic celiac damage.

So, I guess the question is can a celiac eat gluten for years and years and have a negative blood test while they are still on a gluten filled diet?

It is possible.

My hubby had negative bloods (at that point he'd never been gluten-free -we'd never even heard of celiac disease..total gluten ignorance!) but went on a few days later to have biopsies which showed villous atrophy.

Ursa Major Collaborator

Cassidy, yes, it is possible to have a negative blood test and to have celiac disease. Those blood tests aren't that reliable, and can yield false negatives, as can the biopsies.

But if you feel better being gluten-free, it really isn't that important if it is celiac disease or gluten intolerance, is it? The treatment is exactly the same, which is the gluten-free diet.

Nancym Enthusiast

I just did a google search on "villous atrophy and negative blood" and it turned up quite a few things.

Like this: Open Original Shared Link

It could be something other than Celiac, but it can't rule out celiac.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Let me try to re-phrase. Let's say I've been eating gluten my entire life and I have had celiac-type symptoms for years. I take the blood test and it is negative. Is there anyway that I still have celiac? I realize that people who are gluten intolerant/sensitive/or whatever you want to call it still have huge problems with gluten, but don't have positive blood tests because they don't have classic celiac damage.

So, I guess the question is can a celiac eat gluten for years and years and have a negative blood test while they are still on a gluten filled diet?

Yes, I am an example of one of those. I was a full blown celiac close to death when I was diagnosed. I had blood tests for celiac many times at Strong, one of the best hospitals in NY. I wish they had told me about what it was so I could have tried the diet before I got so bad I had given up all hope and hoped for death to end the pain. All they told me was to be glad I didn't have it because I wouldn't be able to eat anything. They never told me what to avoid though. I was a neuro predominent celiac for over 30 years and suffered escalating GI troubles for another 15 on top of that before diagnosis. I had not had a night without a 2 to 3 hour bout of gut wrenching pain and D for the last 5. Thank God for a savvy PT and a wonderful elderly allergist, I know I would not be here without them.

aikiducky Apprentice

Yes what others said, it's possible to have even vili completely gone and still have negative bloods.

Pauliina

Guest cassidy
Cassidy, yes, it is possible to have a negative blood test and to have celiac disease. Those blood tests aren't that reliable, and can yield false negatives, as can the biopsies.

But if you feel better being gluten-free, it really isn't that important if it is celiac disease or gluten intolerance, is it? The treatment is exactly the same, which is the gluten-free diet.

My concern at this point is just because I'm pregnant. I talked to a pediatric gi doctor the other day that specializes in celiac and she made it sound like if you are ONLY gluten intolerant it isn't a big deal as far as other health complications. She even suggested that you could cheat on the diet if you wanted to and the only problem would be your immediate symptoms. I have had many other serious complications from gluten, yet my blood work was negative. I am super sensitive and would never cheat because I get very, very sick and it wouldn't possibly be worth it. I think I'm just realizing that this is yet another doctor who doesn't know everything about gluten. It is frustrating that a leading researcher is still giving bad advice. I don't want my child to suffer like I did and I am not finding any good information about how to lessen those chances or what I really could be passing on to him.

I just did a google search on "villous atrophy and negative blood" and it turned up quite a few things.

Like this: Open Original Shared Link

It could be something other than Celiac, but it can't rule out celiac.

That article is crazy - the endoscopies of the before. I guess it seems like we haven't made many medical advances until you realize how simply medicine was in the past. Hopefully, 20 years from now we will know much more than we do now.

Ursa Major Collaborator

Cassidy, the very best thing you can do for your child and for yourself to stay gluten-free. The doctor is utterly wrong in suggesting that it's okay to cheat if you're 'only' gluten sensitive. You will be doing damage past just immediate symptoms. Of course, you seem to know that already.

jaten Enthusiast
Gluten can attack the skin or brain and often those people have no detectable blood results and no villious atrophy.

This is the first I've seen of this. Can you point me to the research for more reading?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

    2. - SamAlvi replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

    3. - Jsingh replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Son's legs shaking

    4. - lizzie42 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Son's legs shaking

    5. - trents replied to Paulaannefthimiou's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,868
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LMGarrison
    Newest Member
    LMGarrison
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Currently, there are no tests for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out and we do have testing for celiac disease. There are two primary test modalities for diagnosing celiac disease. One involves checking for antibodies in the blood. For the person with celiac disease, when gluten is ingested, it produces an autoimmune response in the lining of the small bowel which generates specific kinds of antibodies. Some people are IGA deficient and such that the IGA antibody tests done for celiac disease will have skewed results and cannot be trusted. In that case, there are IGG tests that can be ordered though, they aren't quite as specific for celiac disease as the IGA tests. But the possibility of IGA deficiency is why a "total IGA" test should always be ordered along with the TTG-IGA. The other modality is an endoscopy (scoping of the upper GI track) with a biopsy of the small bowel lining. The aforementioned autoimmune response produces inflammation in the small bowel lining which, over time, damages the structure of the lining. The biopsy is sent to a lab and microscopically analyzed for signs of this damage. If the damage is severe enough, it can often be spotted during the scoping itself. The endoscopy/biopsy is used as confirmation when the antibody results are positive, since there is a small chance that elevated antibody test scores can be caused by things other than celiac disease, particularly when the antibody test numbers are not particularly high. If the antibody test numbers are 10x normal or higher, physicians will sometimes declare an official diagnosis of celiac disease without an endoscopy/biopsy, particularly in the U.K. Some practitioners use stool tests to detect celiac disease but this modality is not widely recognized in the medical community as valid. Both celiac testing modalities outlined above require that you have been consuming generous amounts of gluten for weeks/months ahead of time. Many people make the mistake of experimenting with the gluten free diet or even reducing their gluten intake prior to testing. By doing so, they invalidate the testing because antibodies stop being produced, disappear from the blood and the lining of the small bowel begins to heal. So, then they are stuck in no man's land, wondering if they have celiac disease or NCGS. To resume gluten consumption, i.e., to undertake a "gluten challenge" is out of the question because their reaction to gluten is so strong that it would endanger their health. The lining of the small bowel is the place where all of the nutrition in the food we consume is absorbed. This lining is made up of billions of microscopically tiny fingerlike projections that create a tremendous nutrient absorption surface area. The inflammation caused by celiac disease wears down these fingers and greatly reduces the surface area needed for nutrient absorption. Thus, people with celiac disease often develop iron deficiency anemia and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiencies. It is likely that many more people who have issues with gluten suffer from NCGS than from celiac disease. We actually know much more about the mechanism of celiac disease than we do about NCGS but some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease.
    • SamAlvi
      Thank you for the clarification and for taking the time to explain the terminology so clearly. I really appreciate your insight, especially the distinction between celiac disease and NCGS and how anemia can point more toward celiac. This was very helpful for me.
    • Jsingh
      Hi,  My 7 year daughter has complained of this in the past, which I thought were part of her glutening symptom, but more recently I have come to figure out it's part of her histamine overload symptom. This one symptom was part of her broader profile, which included irritability, extreme hunger, confusion, post-nasal drip. You might want to look up "histamine intolerance". I wish I had known of this at the time of her diagnosis, life would have been much easier.  I hope you are able to figure out. 
    • lizzie42
      My 5yo was diagnosed with celiac last year by being tested after his sister was diagnosed. We are very strict on the gluten-free diet, but unsure what his reactions are as he was diagnosed without many symptoms other than low ferritin.  He had a school party where his teacher made gluten-free gingerbread men. I almost said no because she made it in her kitchen but I thought it would be ok.  Next day and for a few after his behavior is awful. Hitting, rude, disrespectful. Mainly he kept saying his legs were shaking. Is this a gluten exposure symptom that anyone else gets? Also the bad behavior? 
    • trents
      Not necessarily. The "Gluten Free" label means not more than 20ppm of gluten in the product which is often not enough for super sensitive celiacs. You would need to be looking for "Certified Gluten Free" (GFCO endorsed) which means no more than 10ppm of gluten. Having said that, "Gluten Free" doesn't mean that there will necessarily be more gluten than "Certified Gluten" in any given batch run. It just means there could be. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.