Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Prometheus Labs Vs Enterolab For Genetic Testing


Guest cassidy

Recommended Posts

Guest cassidy

I don't know if I have celiac or gluten intolerance but I know I have some genetic problem with gluten because my mom has it to. I'm pregnant and want genetic testing on my baby on the off chance he has no genes and I can relax and not worry about him developing my problem.

I know Enterolab and Prometheus do genetic testing. I looked at the Prometheus website and it looked like they only tested for celiac genes, with no mention of gluten intolerant genes. I think Enterolab tests for both. I never had any of this done on me, so I'm not sure that I have it right.

So, since I don't know what I have, does it make sense to go with Enterolab so they can check for both, or can Prometheus check for both as well?

Any age limits on this? Can you do it on a newborn?

Thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rachel--24 Collaborator

Enterolab is the only lab who tests for "sensitivity" genes. If you get tested for Celiac genes using Prometheus....and dont have a Celiac gene.....then you can be 100% positive that you *do* have sensitivity genes.

I would go for whichever test is more affordable for you. You are *guaranteed* to be positive either way with Enterolab because basically the entire population carries these genes in some combination or another. In my opinion the "sensitivity" genes dont really tell us much.....unless you are of Asian decent you will have either sensitivity genes, or celiac genes...or one of each.

If you do not have a Celiac gene.....your baby could still have a gene from your hubby.

The "sensitivity" genes arent really diagnostic of anything. Like I said, if you dont have either of the Celiac genes you're guaranteed to have 2 "sensitivity" genes. You can take it for what its worth. They are not recognized by any lab other than Enterolab.

I would assume that even if you dont have Celiac genes and the gluten-free diet is beneficial to your health you would continue with it regardless. As far as finding out the genetics to see if your baby may develop Celiac...you can find this out with either lab.

The test is a "cheek swab" so it can be done at any age.

larry mac Enthusiast
.......

The test is a "cheek swab" so it can be done at any age.

Rachel,

I had blood drawn & sent to Prometheus. I don't have it at the moment, but I think it was:

Celiac Serology:

5-marker serology panel (Anti-human tissue transglutaminase IgA, Anti-endomysial IgA, Total Serum IgA, Anti-gliadin IgA, Anti-gliadin IgG).

And the Crohn's disease test also. In all, it was about $425. I'm not sure, but I don't think we ever did the genetic testing.

best regards, lm

Open Original Shared Link

Guest cassidy

So, if you will either have celiac genes or gluten sensitivity genes, then what is the point of genetic testing? I was hoping that they was an option where you had neither gene.

Since both are treated the same and if my son ever had symptoms I would put him on a gluten-free diet and not go through testing anyway, I guess it really doesn't matter what genes he has.

Thanks for clearing things up.

Rachel--24 Collaborator
So, if you will either have celiac genes or gluten sensitivity genes, then what is the point of genetic testing? I was hoping that they was an option where you had neither gene.

Some people want to know if they are actually susceptible to Celiac. If they carry genes which can predispose them to the disease....in this case the genetic testing can be helpful.

I agree...if your son has symptoms which clear up on the diet...it doesnt really matter what his genes are.

happygirl Collaborator

Cassidy:

Important to note that there really isn't a lot of research linking dr. fine's "gluten sensitive" genes to anything.

Wht I'm interested in---do all people with some sort of allergic response have a "gene" for it? If not (which I've never heard of), then why are there ones for gluten (supposedly)?

Laura

Rachel--24 Collaborator
Wht I'm interested in---do all people with some sort of allergic response have a "gene" for it? If not (which I've never heard of), then why are there ones for gluten (supposedly)?

Laura

Laura,

Personally I dont think there is such a thing as gluten sensitivity genes. Like you said.....there is no real research/studies to support Dr. Fine's claim.

I think anyone who develops leaky gut will become sensitive to gluten....even those of Asian decent with the DQ4 gene (the only gene not recognized as a sensitivity gene by Dr. Fine).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest cassidy

My mother has a problem with gluten and when she found out she sent an email to the entire family. We found out yesterday that her brother (my uncle) and his daughter are now gluten-free and doing great. So, I know something runs in my family. My grandfather also died of stomach cancer. None of us were officially tested, we all just went the diet route, so would it seem more like celiac and less like gluten intolerance since there is such a family history? I didn't realize that gluten sensitivity genes were controversial. Does Dr. Fine think that gluten sensitivity is genetic as well?

celiacgirls Apprentice

I did the Enterolab testing because it would tell me if I had the DQ1 gene as well as the DQ2 and DQ8.

I believe DQ1 is recognized by some neurologists as being linked to neurological problems due to gluten.

I also did want to know the likelihood of getting "official" celiac disease.

Since you already know there is some genetic link in your family, it might not be worth it to have your baby tested. He'll probably eat mostly gluten-free anyway and you will be quick to notice if gluten does cause a problem.

I haven't yet tested my kids but they are both gluten-free. I plan to test them at some point but it is more for curiosity than anything else. Also, if they do have one of the widely-accepted celiac genes, they might be more likely to stay on the diet as adults.

The Enterolab test was $149 when I did it.

JerryK Community Regular

I did the gene test specifically because I wanted to know whether or not I carried the Celiac gene. I don't think there is a whole lot of value, as the earlier posters said, in the gluten sensitive gene markers, because everyone has them. In my case I have two, but do not have the Celiac gene.

In my case, the stool test and gene test indicated gluten sensitivity. Blood tests and the gene test ruled out Celiac. That's pretty much as good of an answer as you can expect.

Another thing to realize is (in my opinion and correct me if I am wrong) the gluten sensitivity genes are certainly arguable, because they are interpreted by Enterolab..and it is Enterolab that indicates which genes they think are pointers to gluten sensitivity. Granted the guy probably knows what he is talking about, but I'm sure there's plenty of room for debate.

So if you want to rule out Celiac, but not gluten sensitivity, the gene test is of value..

Of course then you could end up like me :lol:

Mtndog Collaborator

The good thing about Prometheus is that insurance will cover it if your doctor orders it. By the time I saw a celiac GI I was already gluten-free and had such severe reactions to gluten that she just went straight to the gene test. I ended up with the DQ8.

I don't know if insurance will pay for Enterolab.

happygirl Collaborator
My mother has a problem with gluten and when she found out she sent an email to the entire family. We found out yesterday that her brother (my uncle) and his daughter are now gluten-free and doing great. So, I know something runs in my family. My grandfather also died of stomach cancer. None of us were officially tested, we all just went the diet route, so would it seem more like celiac and less like gluten intolerance since there is such a family history? I didn't realize that gluten sensitivity genes were controversial. Does Dr. Fine think that gluten sensitivity is genetic as well?

Cassidy: To my knowledge, Dr. Fine is the only one who recognizes the gluten sensitive genes. So yes, I would definitely say it is controversial in that we just don't know enough. I see it two ways---there are multiple genes linked to multiple foods (milk, soy, eggs, etc) that we don't know about, or there aren't genes. I don't really know what to think, considering gluten intolerance should typically be just like a casein, or soy, or egg, etc. intolerance....we never hear anything about those with "true" allergies (IgE) having specific genes....so why is there one for only gluten (delayed) allergy (IgG)?

Again, I don't know, I'm just throwing out the devil's advocate conversation that runs in my head. My problem is that I'm often too logical and can see the potentials in both sides of the argument! :)

chrissy Collaborator

my family is involved in a celiac study being done at the university of california, irvine. there is no question that this is a reputable institution. the gal in charge of the study says she is not aware of any gluten sensitivity gene, and she said that they do not accept anyone into the study that has been diagnosed by enterolab.

dr. fine has been testing people for how many years? and he still can't get together his notes to publish??????

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    3. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    5. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,084
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    bigwave
    Newest Member
    bigwave
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AlwaysLearning
      Get tested for vitamin deficiencies.  Though neuropathy can be a symptom of celiac, it can also be caused by deficiencies due to poor digestion caused by celiac and could be easier to treat.
    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.