Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is It Really Celiac Disease?


crysmz1981

Recommended Posts

crysmz1981 Rookie

I've been having digestive problems for several years and was diagnosed with gastroparesis about two years ago. I have been chronically iron deficient so I recently saw a hematologist for iron infusions. She did a blood test for Celiac Sprue which came in the "moderate to strongly positive range." It was 31, and she said above 30 is in that range. I was given info about Celiac Disease and gluten free diet, but she said that my GI doc may need to do other tests to confirm the diagnosis.

Is it possible to not have Celiac Disease even if the blood test is positive? I ask because everything I've read indicated that people with this problem have unexplained weight loss and diarreah. I, on the other hand, am a very healthy and stable 130 lbs and I have chronic constipation. So I'm somewhat confused at this point.

Any thoughts??

Thanks!

Crystal


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

Weight loss and diarrhea are the "classic" symptoms, but that probably contributes to why this disease is so grossly underdiagnosed. Some people even have trouble with obesity because of their celiac! One woman here lost 100 pounds going gluten-free! So, it varies.

Constipation is also a symptom. So is anemia.

A GI doctor will want to do a biopsy. If the biopsy is positive, you have confirmation that you have it for sure. If it's "negative" it can mean you don't have it, but it can also mean that they just didn't biopsy a place with damage. Negative = inconclusive.

It's up to you whether you want a more formal diagnosis. You can just try the diet and see if you feel better ... then you have your answer. Some people want the formal diagnosis, some are just as satisfied with dietary reponse.

JerryK Community Regular
I've been having digestive problems for several years and was diagnosed with gastroparesis about two years ago. I have been chronically iron deficient so I recently saw a hematologist for iron infusions. She did a blood test for Celiac Sprue which came in the "moderate to strongly positive range." It was 31, and she said above 30 is in that range. I was given info about Celiac Disease and gluten free diet, but she said that my GI doc may need to do other tests to confirm the diagnosis.

Is it possible to not have Celiac Disease even if the blood test is positive? I ask because everything I've read indicated that people with this problem have unexplained weight loss and diarreah. I, on the other hand, am a very healthy and stable 130 lbs and I have chronic constipation. So I'm somewhat confused at this point.

Any thoughts??

Thanks!

Crystal

Most medical tests have a pretty narrow range. It's my experience that you have to have it really "bad" to actually fall within the range. I have had tests for testosterone that placed me at 240ng/dl with a test range from 200-1000ng/dl. Because I fell within the accepted range of normal, I could not get treatment for it, even though I had the testosterone of an 85 year old man. (granted gluten probably had a large effect on my T level, but that is a different discussion.)

The fact that you fall within the range that they consider "postive" is highly significant. I'd be so bold as to say yes it likely is truely Celiac, but at least you now KNOW the cause of your digestive problems.

That is my opinion. j

jayhawkmom Enthusiast

My *biggest* problem was that I could not LOSE weight. Seriously. Lots of tummy aches, brain fog, and my amazing ability to hang on to 70+ pregnancy pounds from when my 3rd child arrived.

Once I got totally on board with the gluten-free diet, I started dropping weight like crazy. My tummy aches are all-but gone, but I have 3 small children so I'll never be free of brain fog, LOL!

The scope of Celiac/GI related issues is sooo broad, but the diagnostic criteria is sooo narrow. Eventually, doctors are going to figure this out. Until then... we have to continue to be our best advocates!

Best wishes to you!!

happygirl Collaborator

Crystal,

Celiac is often referred to as a medical chameleon because the presentation of symptoms varies so much from person to person, often things that contradict each other (D vs. constipation, weight loss vs. weight gain, etc).

Which blood tests did you have run, and which were positive?

You will find many people on this board who have had similar problems to you, and have had doctors tell them that they can't have Celiac because they weren't "classic" patients. Their doctors were wrong.

Best of luck,

Laura

crysmz1981 Rookie
Which blood tests did you have run, and which were positive?

They gave me a copy of the results and here is what it says:

Gliadin IgG AB - 31 (Moderate to Strong Positive: >30 units)

Gliadin IgA AB - 2 (Negative: <20 units)

Now I'm even more confused. I hadn't looked at this very closely and didn't realize that one was positive and one was negative. What does that mean??

happygirl Collaborator

You need to have the full panel of tests run. Many doctors don't recognize that there are more than two tests. Call your doctor and tell him you want to come in for the full panel.

AGA IgA

AGA IgG

EMA

tTG

total serum IgA

You had the ones in italics done. This is why a panel should be done....there isn't one test that is perfect.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



rez Apprentice

The test that you had come back weak positive is the least reliable test when diagnosing Celiac. I would definitely research it more yourself and find a new doctor. Those tests aren't even used when diagnosing Celiac anymore. An IgG can mean a lot of things or nothing at all and it is not specific to Celiac at all. The two most specific tests are tTG and EMA. The EMA is the most specific. My son's tTG was positive and he had a scope and biopsy done yesterday. I cannot say loud enough that you must find a good doctor and get some answers. We have been doctoring for over a year and even a positive tTG can even have a 5% chance of meaning other things. We are waiting for results. Good luck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    3. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    5. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,084
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    bigwave
    Newest Member
    bigwave
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AlwaysLearning
      Get tested for vitamin deficiencies.  Though neuropathy can be a symptom of celiac, it can also be caused by deficiencies due to poor digestion caused by celiac and could be easier to treat.
    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.