Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Questions About Tests For Celiac


terrymarie

Recommended Posts

terrymarie Newbie

Hi,

I've suspected I have celiac or gluten intolerance for a while due to the symptoms I've had. Additionally, I have Hashimoto's hypothyroid. Lately, I have become intolerant of dairy, as well. I went to a gastric doc on Monday. He's going to do the gold standard test on me and bloodwork to see if I carry the gene. My question centers around eating gluten before my April 30 test. I've been mostly gluten free for a while, but unintentionally I wasn't all that good about hidden gluten. I went back to consuming gluten in meals this week because I've read it impacts the test results if you go gluten free before you actually get diagnosed formily. I don't want to hinder my results. If even having a trace would be disasterous for someone with celiac, would it be enough to impact the results of the test?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CMCM Rising Star

I am starting to think you can have gluten intolerance for quite a long time (decades perhaps) before actual celiac disease gets triggered (assuming you have the celiac gene, of course). You can probably have some degree of celiac disease for a long time before the damage gets bad enough to allow the antibodies to leak thru your gut and get into the blood, where it could finally be detected in the blood test.

If you have been mostly gluten free for some time, it's entirely possible your blood test would be negative because healing could have occurred, and re-introducing gluten for a test can be problematic....no one seems to be able to say definitely how long it would take to re-damage your intestines for purposes of a blood test. Some things I've read indicate rather a lot of gluten daily for 3 or 4 weeks, other things indicate longer than that, perhaps several months. Who knows? It's all very tricky.

I just read that damage to the intestines actually has to be quite severe to allow proteins to show up in the blood tests. For those with active celiac disease of a less severe nature, only about 30% of those will be positive in a blood test. SO......to me, depending on the blood test means you have to allow or create severe damage for the diagnosis. That seems kind of idiotic, but that's the general state of things.

What this means for MOST of us is that if we are reacting to gluten, and even if some degree of damage is occurring internally, we won't get a positive diagnosis very easily.

Testing for the gene is a great starting place....if you have the celiac gene you have a strong basis for more suspicion about celiac disease. If you don't have the gene, it could still be gluten sensitivity, which can make you very sick as well and which can also do internal damage to tissues and organs. So don't dismiss "mere" gluten sensitivity. Some researchers are starting to think that most, of not all people are gluten sensitive. Some just develop a better tolerance for it than others, but down the road it may well be discovered with certainty that eating gluten has led to a lot of our modern illnesses, such as obesity, heart disease, all the digestive problems such as heartburn and reflux etc., various autoimmune diseases, and so on. Over 200 syndromes have a strong link to celiac disease. Basically, gluten is a poison to everyone. I am really starting to believe that.

terrymarie Newbie

I think you are right. I don't want to dismiss an intolerance. I am not feeling very well since I started eating gluten for the tests, but I am going to try to hang in there. It does seem counterproductive to eat it in order to verify what you already know. I'd just go gluten free if not for the pain and the thought that my kids may need testing. The doc really believes celiac is the answer.

  • 2 weeks later...
mommida Enthusiast

You must consume enough gluten to cause enough damage for the blood tests to show a positive result in the varying RANGE.

The genetic test is not very accurate (my personal experience).

The gluten free diet and your body's reaction is a test that you personally will have to interpret the results. It sounds like you have all ready determined your health is better on a gluten free diet.

Experimenting with the gluten free diet will throw off the results of the blood tests and endoscopy with biopsy.

L.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Jmartes71 commented on Scott Adams's article in Multiple Sclerosis and Celiac Disease
      4

      Gluten-Free Diet Linked to Reduced Inflammation and Improved Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis (+Video)

    2. - Scott Adams commented on Scott Adams's article in Product Labeling Regulations
      2

      FDA Moves to Improve Gluten Labeling—What It Means for People With Celiac Disease

    3. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      nothing has changed

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Is it gluten?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,350
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bea71
    Newest Member
    Bea71
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.