Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Got My Bloodwork Results


ElenaDragon

Recommended Posts

ElenaDragon Explorer

My bloodwork came back negative, and I called my doctor's office to get the actual numbers. I am also being mailed the results.

IgG 0.7 (normal < 10)

IgA 2.9 (normal < 5)

tTG IgG 1.1 (normal < 9) - not positive this was IgG, the nurse was talking very fast

The problem I see is that before the test I really hadn't been eating much that has gluten in it. I was primarily eating oats and some rice for grains. I had even switched to rice crackers instead of wheat crackers. Occasionally I would have a sandwich when out. I'm sure there are small amounts of gluten in other things I ate, but it has not been a major daily component of my diet. I wasn't consciously trying to avoid gluten, instead I was just trying to stick to soluble fiber to help my IBS. But I'm concerned that this may have affected the test results.

Also, do doctors normally test for the celiac genes? It doesn't look like mine did. :angry:

I went gluten free starting yesterday because I think it's possible I could benefit from it. I really don't have much to lose, and if it doesn't help then at least I'll know that. The more I read about celiac, the more it seems to fit, but I don't know if that's just because I want it to or if I may actually have it. I have abdominal pain, gas, bloating, constipation, and diarrhea. I had my gallbladder removed due to gallstones when I was 19 (I'm 28 now). I get migraines and have Interstitial Cystitis (a bladder condition). I've already eliminated red meat, dairy, and soy from my diet, have been eating low fat and plenty of fiber (mainly soluble), but still having issues.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Eriella Explorer

Hello--

First of all, unless you were eating 4-6 slices of bread a day (or the equivalent) for 4 months or more, it is highly unlikely to test positive. So you could have celiac disease still. I would go 100% gluten free for 2 months, if your symptoms go away you have a gluten intolerance. You can do the genetic test at a later point to figure out if it is celiac or non-celiac gluten intolerance, or you could decide not to spend the money.

If you have any questions or support, just ask!

ElenaDragon Explorer

Thank you, that sounds like very sound advice. I was definitely not eating that much bread (or the equivalent). Incidentally, I have a followup appointment with my GI in two months, so if I go gluten free, then perhaps I will have something to talk to her about by then. A diagnosis would be nice, but really what I want is to feel better. If the gluten-free diet does it for me, then wonderful!

Thanks!

ElenaDragon Explorer

Okay, so I got the results in the mail and have them on paper now. The actual results are:

Gliadin IgG 0.7 (normal < 10)

Gliadin IgA 2.9 (normal < 2.9)

TTG IgG 1.1 (normal < 6)

TTG IgA 0.6 (normal < 4)

They seem pretty negative to me, but without eating a lot of bread beforehand, who knows. I wish my doctor had said something. She did ask if I had a problem with wheat or oats, and I said I ate oatmeal for breakfast every morning (plain rolled oats)... but from what I understand, oatmeal would only have traces of gluten due to cross contamination?

Also, at the bottom of the results, there is a note that says "An exclamation mark (!) indicates a result that was not dispersed into the flowsheet." They all have an exclamation mark next to them. Anyone know what that means?

confused Community Regular
Okay, so I got the results in the mail and have them on paper now. The actual results are:

Gliadin IgG 0.7 (normal < 10)

Gliadin IgA 2.9 (normal < 2.9)

TTG IgG 1.1 (normal < 6)

TTG IgA 0.6 (normal < 4)

They seem pretty negative to me, but without eating a lot of bread beforehand, who knows. I wish my doctor had said something. She did ask if I had a problem with wheat or oats, and I said I ate oatmeal for breakfast every morning (plain rolled oats)... but from what I understand, oatmeal would only have traces of gluten due to cross contamination?

Also, at the bottom of the results, there is a note that says "An exclamation mark (!) indicates a result that was not dispersed into the flowsheet." They all have an exclamation mark next to them. Anyone know what that means?

I would think with your IGa being right at the normal,. that you were just not eating enough gluten at the time of the test. I would stay completely away from gluten and see if you feel better and if so then you know you have at least an gluten intolerance, if not celiac.

paula

ElenaDragon Explorer

Oops, that was a typo. :unsure: The IgA should be: normal < 5.

confused Community Regular

what you could also do, is do the gene testing threw enterolab for 149 bucks and see if you have the gene for celiac.

paula


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ElenaDragon Explorer

Yeah I have thought about that. It's a lot of money though. I think I'm going to wait and see how the gluten-free trial goes first.

chrissy Collaborator

according to your blood tests, and the fact that you said you had occasional gluten, i would think that your negative test results are probably right. it only takes a little bit of gluten to perpetuate the autoimmune response in a celiac. this does NOT mean that you are not having a problem with gluten, it just means you probably don't have celiac disease.

Guest Doll
according to your blood tests, and the fact that you said you had occasional gluten, i would think that your negative test results are probably right. it only takes a little bit of gluten to perpetuate the autoimmune response in a celiac. this does NOT mean that you are not having a problem with gluten, it just means you probably don't have celiac disease.

I agree with Chrissy. That said, a percentage of Celiacs have negative bloodwork and a positive biopsy. If you are still eating oats, and you have not been off all other forms of gluten for very long, you likely would show some damage on the biopsy. If you want further "official" testing, it may be worth the biopsy. It's rare, but some people have Celiac without the typical Celiac genes.

If that checks out negative (assuming it was done correctly), then you likely do have non-Celiac gluten intolerance. I personally would just stick with the diet at that point. Or, if you don't want a biopsy, just stick with the diet now.

There really isn't enough published data to say that Enterolab is accurate, or worth the price. Of course, it is your choice.

P.S. Your doctor should have checked you EMA levels as part of a complete Celiac panel...

"IgA class anti-endomysial antibodies (AEA) are very specific, occurring only in celiac disease and DH. These antibodies are found in approximately 80% of patients with DH and in essentially 100% of patients with active celiac disease. IgA endomysial antibodies are more sensitive and specific than gliadin antibodies for diagnosis of celiac disease. Antibody titers (dilutions) are found to parallel morphological changes in the jejunum and can also be used to reflect compliance with gluten-free diets. Titers decrease or become negative in patients on gluten free diets and reappear upon gluten challenge."

ElenaDragon Explorer

Thanks for the info. I think I'm going to go with the diet for now and see if I feel any better on it. I have another doctor appointment in two months, so I will talk with my doctor about the results of the diet then.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,198
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mya H
    Newest Member
    Mya H
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      Please read: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-steps-improve-gluten-ingredient-disclosure-foods?fbclid=IwY2xjawPeXhJleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFzaDc3NWRaYzlJOFJ4R0Fic3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHrwuSsw8Be7VNGOrKKWFVbrjmf59SGht05nIALwnjQ0DoGkDDK1doRBDzeeX_aem_GZcRcbhisMTyFUp3YMUU9Q
    • cristiana
      Hi @Atl222 As @trents points out, there could be many reasons for this biopsy result.  I am interested to know, is your gastroenterologist concerned?  Also, are your blood tests showing steady improvement over the years? I remember when I had my last biopsy, several years after diagnosis, mine came back with with raised lymphocytes but no villous damage, too! In my own case, my consultant wasn't remotely concerned - in fact, he said I might still get this result even if all I ever did was eat nothing but rice and water.   My coeliac blood tests were still steadily improving, albeit slowly, which was reassuring.
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease or gluten/oats exposure. See attachment. But you might try eliminating oats to start with and possibly dairy for a few months and then seek another endoscopy/biopsy to see if there was a reduction in lymphocyte counts. 
    • Scott Adams
      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especially since Eden has a long-standing reputation for transparency. While the lack of gluten labeling can understandably give pause, manufacturer confirmation like this is often what people rely on for traditionally fermented products. As always, trusting your body after trying it is reasonable, but based on the information you gathered, your conclusion makes sense.
    • Scott Adams
      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can take 12–24 months (sometimes longer) for antibodies and the intestinal lining to fully heal, particularly in teens and young adults. Eating gluten again to “test” things isn’t recommended and won’t give you clear answers—it’s far more likely to cause harm than clarity. Weight not changing is also very common in celiac and doesn’t rule anything out. Please know that your frustration and sadness matter; this adjustment is hard, and feeling stuck can really affect mental health. You deserve support, and if you can, reaching out to a GI dietitian or mental health professional familiar with chronic illness could really help you through this phase. This study indicates that a majority of celiacs don't recover until 5 years after diagnosis and starting a gluten-free diet: Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet However, it's also possible that what the study really shows is the difficulty in maintaining a 100% gluten-free diet. I suspect that if you looked closely at the diets of those who did not recover within 2 years might be that their diets were not 100% gluten-free. Perhaps they ate out more often, or didn't understand all of the hidden ingredients where gluten can hide. Either way, it shows how difficult recovery from celiac disease can be for most people. According to this study: This article explores other causes of flattened villi:    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.