Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Alkaline Vs. Acid ?


UR Groovy

Recommended Posts

UR Groovy Explorer

Hi,

Wasn't sure where to put this topic. Maybe I should have stuck it in Gab?

I've been noticing something interesting about my dietary changes and that I do much better when I eat more alkaline than acidic foods. I happened upon some info about PH and would like to look into it further. I have never paid attention to this before, but would like to. Anybody out there who has any knowledge or experience with this? If anyone out there can direct me to a reputable website or maybe a book that could be helpful in learning about this, I would really appreciate it.

thanks,

k


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



zkat Apprentice

Paleo diet and the Paleo diet for athletes delves into PH levels of food and how they impact the body.

The website is Paleodiet.com

Human Blood is slightly alkaline with an optimal pH of 7.35-7.45. This site is helpful, but I will not swear by it's reputation. Open Original Shared Link

Centa Newbie

Hello,

I've about half-researched this one. I'll be interested to read what other members post on it.

An alternative medicine practitioner strongly recommended that I check my pH and if it was acid, to eat foods to make my pH more alkaline.

I did some reading about it on the net, but finally decided that the whole thing wasn't for me, even though the foods recommended are healthy ones and I should hope that they would be in my diet.

  • I not only tested my urine, with the recommended kit that I bought at Wild Oats (there were a couple different kinds available; I presume that they're available in other health foods stores, too), since that's what is supposed to be the indicator of body pH, or alimentary pH, but also tested everything that I could think of: my mouth, the tap water, the water in the bottled spring water that I drink. And I tested throughout the day. None of the sites tell you to do that, but since the whole premise is that your body, or its fluids, remain in a steady acidic or basic state, and that you are to eat different foods to re-set the pH state, obviously, I thought, I should have acidic urine 23 hours a day as well as that one morning hour of the test.

    In my case, my urine registered acid in the morning (they tell you to expect this, that this is the sign of trouble), but in an hour was within the range that the pro-pH sites were saying was normal. 23 hours of the day, the urine test seemed to be saying that my urine at least, was satisfactory as far as its pH was concerned.

What really encouraged me to drop the pH concerns at all were three other things, the first the most important to me.

  • I read a full-fledged, sample-based medical scientific paper that established that the pH of the GI tract was highly regular, was alkaline and that what you ate didn't affect that. I read far enough around that I started to see that in other articles based on sample gathering, too, by the traditional medical community (by that, I mean Western). None of the sites recommending eating certain foods to change the body pH made any remarks about the pH levels in different parts of the body...they would say that that morning pH test was an indicator of the whole body, or all its fluids.


  • (!) The sites disagree with each other as to what food items are acid, or make the bodily fluids (or the whole body) more acidic, and which foods make it more alkaline. And there were very big discrepancies in some of those lists. Now, I figured that if this thing about eating foods that change the pH is true, then through common experience of increased well-being, surely there ought to be a very high level of consistency in those lists of foods to eat or to not eat. Some foods were on all the lists, but there were enough foods that some were claiming to be "good" that other sites were claiming were "bad", to be avoided, that I really wasn't satisfied.


  • I discovered that I could fiddle with that morning pH test of my urine pretty easily. Like eating spinach the night before. If pH is systems-wide consistent, as these sites claim, it shouldn't be so easily manipulated, I thought.

So sum total, I don't know what to think about the claims that pH balancing shifting it toward alkaline will take away all the symptoms that are listed on those sites.

By the time I got through reading, I had seen many claims but no scientifically cross checked (through blind studies of different groups, or placebo versus non placebo, etc.) demonstration of the pH claims.

On the other hand, the foods they encourage you to eat are all healthy. I do think eating leafy greens, and other foods with high nutrient content will make anyone feel better, and for me it can be pretty dramatic: I can feel the effect in a couple days.

Sum total sum total, I'd need to see the pro-re-balance the body pH proponents deal directly with the medical studies that say that the pH of the GI tract is constant, and constantly alkaline. And particularly deal with the samples the medical studies present.

At this point I'm not convinced. If the major drive for a person with celiac sprue is to protect and heal the wellbeing of their GI tract, it didn't look to me like this pH rebalancing had much to offer, since the tract, in whatever state it is, is ALREADY alkaline, well within their claimed health range

:) I end up writing long posts sometimes. Sorry about that. I really would be interested, in a positive way, in hearing other people's research of the matter or testing in their own life

UR Groovy Explorer
...

By the time I got through reading, I had seen many claims but no scientifically cross checked (through blind studies of different groups, or placebo versus non placebo, etc.) demonstration of the pH claims.

On the other hand, the foods they encourage you to eat are all healthy. I do think eating leafy greens, and other foods with high nutrient content will make anyone feel better, and for me it can be pretty dramatic: I can feel the effect in a couple days.

...

Sum total sum total, I'd need to see the pro-re-balance the body pH proponents deal directly with the medical studies that say that the pH of the GI tract is constant, and constantly alkaline. And particularly deal with the samples the medical studies present.

At this point I'm not convinced.

...

I see what you're saying. Thanks for posting. And, thanks zkat.

I also was noticing a lot of conflicting info. on different websites with no real proof of anything, except that most of the foods that seem to be recommended (to increase alkalinity) are, in fact, good for your body anyway. It could be simply that because I've increased my veggie and good fat choices, I've been noticing that I'm feeling more energy and better in general.

Di-gfree Apprentice

I

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,748
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Hollee
    Newest Member
    Hollee
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Russ H
      The EMA test is an old and less sensitive test for anti-tTG2 antibodies. It relies on a technician using a microscope to check for fluorescence of a labelled substrate (typically monkey oesophagus or human umbilicus), giving a simple positive/negative result. It is similar to running a standard anti-tTG2 test but with a high cut-off, making it more specific but less sensitive. Transient rises in tTG2 can be caused by e.g. viral infections and inflammation. Very high levels of anti-tTG2 (>x10 standard range) are almost certainly coeliac disease but moderately raised levels can have several causes apart from coeliac disease. Other food allergies can cause villi blunting but that is much rarer than coeliac disease or other non-coeliac causes. Not All That Flattens Villi Is Celiac Disease: A Review of Enteropathies
    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.