Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Chocolate Candy Precaution


debmidge

Recommended Posts

debmidge Rising Star

The holidays are coming up and I wanted to share this experience with you all

I purchased Belgium-style candy made in Vermont and after the purchase realized that it had wheat in it.

I had this happen last year (someone gave me candy from Germany that had barley in it).

I've noticed that some chocolates from U.S., Switzerland, Belgium and Germany may use wheat or barley -- so be forewarned. They might come in cute shapes (like Santas, animals, etc.) or in brightly colored packages or foils. They may even be more expensive that Hershey's or regular chocolate bars. Please read the label before purchasing or consuming.

If you happen to eat it first, you might find that it has a "strange" flavor; the texture may be smoother than let's say a Hershey's bar, but the flavor has a certain flavor that I can't describe but you'd know it when you tasted it -- it has a hint of something that just isn't chocolate. (I don't have celiac so I can eat it, but I don't care for that extra taste that the barley and wheat gives it, that's how I knew to read the label after I had it in my mouth. Had I realized that it had wheat in it, I would not have purchased it).

Anyway, just a warning as those holidays will soon be here....


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



blueeyedmanda Community Regular

I know what you mean I was in the Lindt store in King of Prussia and could not find a candy bar without wheat in it.

debmidge Rising Star

it makes the chocolate taste weird & dilutes the chocolate taste

Franceen Explorer

I was in COSTCO yesterday looking at all those holiday Belgian/Swiss/German etc candy offerings that I normally LOVE so much. MANY had wheat in them - mostly the filled candies. However, I did find (and buy) some truffles made in Belgium - Gavarny brand name, that do not have wheat or barley and are made in a facility that processes only tree nuts. VERY DELICIOUS, and quite expensive! They are in a fancy box too.

Doesn't have that "flavor" either! I know what you mean about the flavor - it is something that you can't describe, but as a kid, I loved it in the chocolate rabbits, bunnies, santas, etc! Now I don't like it.

We also have been able to get the "fancy Hershey's" dark chocolates - "Cacao Reserve" this time. They are gluten-free, but not European. It takes some time-consuming reading with a magnifying glass to find stuff, but I usually do manage to find fancy candies that are gluten-free. I also get a kick out of the people looking at me strangely when I spend so much time pouring over the ingredients lists! Oh well.

TimSpfd Newbie

In the US check for a local chocolatier, many smaller companies use purer chocolate recipes than the big ones that have to worry about shelf stability more. I work for one such and have never had any problems with our solid chocolate items. There are risks for cross contamination here, and many items that do contain gluten. Always avoid anything with rice in it - rice crunch bars etc. The rice they use with chocolate is malted (barley) to keep it crisper. Also watch out for items with other ingredients such as nuts or fruit since those may have gluten from a previous processer.

I wont post my employer here but if you search for "chocolate allergy information" it will show up on the first page. I've made an effort to put together a page for our website that gives the info as best as I can determine.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,473
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kelly Hannon
    Newest Member
    Kelly Hannon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.