Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test And Endoscopy


Runner1978

Recommended Posts

Runner1978 Rookie

In September, my blood tests were conflicting. One was positive for celiac, the other (apparently the more accurate) was negative. I believe I had a 5 on that one. I've been gluten free for two months. The diarhea has gone away, for the most part, I'm no longer nauseous and I do look healthier. That being said, I have alot of acid reflux and severe abdominal cramps every second day or so despite being gluten-free. So I saw a specialist who says I may or may not have celiac, I may just be gluten intolerant. He also says I may have crohns. My family doctor had tested me for crohns with a blood test and it came back negative. That said, the specialist says there is no blood test for crohns. So now I'm quite worried. I've started eating gluten again in preparation for an endoscopy. So far, I sill feel ok. I sometimes feel nauseoous but it's difficult to tell if these symptoms are real or imagined as I'd really rather have celiac than crohns.

My main frustration is that I can't get a straight answer. I'm not exactly sure what I'm asking with this post. Perhaps a bit of guidance on my positive/negative blood test.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



BRob66 Rookie
In September, my blood tests were conflicting. One was positive for celiac, the other (apparently the more accurate) was negative. I believe I had a 5 on that one. I've been gluten free for two months. The diarhea has gone away, for the most part, I'm no longer nauseous and I do look healthier. That being said, I have alot of acid reflux and severe abdominal cramps every second day or so despite being gluten-free. So I saw a specialist who says I may or may not have celiac, I may just be gluten intolerant. He also says I may have crohns. My family doctor had tested me for crohns with a blood test and it came back negative. That said, the specialist says there is no blood test for crohns. So now I'm quite worried. I've started eating gluten again in preparation for an endoscopy. So far, I sill feel ok. I sometimes feel nauseoous but it's difficult to tell if these symptoms are real or imagined as I'd really rather have celiac than crohns.

My main frustration is that I can't get a straight answer. I'm not exactly sure what I'm asking with this post. Perhaps a bit of guidance on my positive/negative blood test.

My naturopathic doctor did a blood test,,allergy testing and a saliva test. In my opinion medical doctors don't test for this enough. they usually do the small bowel biopsy,,but I have been told that if you are off gluten/wheat for a while the tests can be negative and conflicting. In the past I was diagnosed with IBS,depression,and environmental allergies. also the villi in the small bowel can be damaged and you can have other food related reactions. i am currently soy free,egg free and dairy free. I also hear some of the syptoms are like crohn's disease and that if untreated celiacs can cause crohns. good luck

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

If you have been gluten-free for 2 months, you will need to eat a LOT of gluten for 3 months in order to damage your villi (which healed in those 2 gluten-free months) enough to have a positive biopsy result.

There has been a lot of talk lately about the problems with biopsy--I hope you can find all the discussion on some of the other recent threads on this board! But biopsy is NOT a reliable way to rule out celiac, as there is the potential for a huge possibility of false negatives. This is especially true if you have already been off gluten for more than a month.

happygirl Collaborator

However, if your doctor takes multiple biopsies from multiple places, it increases the possibility of an accurate biopsy reading.

I would recommend that before/at the time of the biopsy (since you are eating gluten again), to have the full Celiac blood panel run. It involves five tests:

AGA IgA

AGA IgG

EMA IgA

tTG IgA

Total IgA.

This way you'll have the biopsy and the full Celiac bloodwork run to help in making an educated decision. Best of luck.

Runner1978 Rookie

If I understand correctly, the blood tests are to identify anti-bodies related to the disease. How can one test be positive without meaning I have it?

happygirl Collaborator

There are different tests in the Celiac blood panel and none of them, individually, are 100% sensitive and 100% specific to Celiac. That is why they recommend the full panel.

While the severity of the damage is often correlated to parts of the Celiac panel (I forget if it is EMA or tTG), you can still have a negative blood test and be positive on biopsy, and vice versa.

If you post the names of the tests, the score, and the range, we can help interpret.

  • 6 months later...
kifert Newbie

my blood tests for celiac came back fine, but my gastroenterologist wants to do an endoscopy while she's got me there for the colonoscopy...My daughter has celiac, but I have no symptoms. does doing the endoscopy make sense?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



aikiducky Apprentice

Kifert, absolutely it makes sense, especially if you're going to be having a colonoscopy anyway. Bloodtests aren't all that reliable, they are only reliably positive in people who have extensive damage to their intestines. If you are in the earlier stages of celiac your blood test might be a false negative but the endoscopy might find some damage. Ask them to take plenty of samples though, because just a couple of samples might miss damage if it's spotty.

Pauliina

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.