Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Caramel Color/maltodextrin...gluten-free?


kay's mommom

Recommended Posts

kay's mommom Newbie

Im new on here and I need some help. I just recieved a list of gluten containing foods to avoid in the mail and it says caramel color, malt, and dextrin are some ingredients to avoid. Is maltodextrin also bad for celiac? Also, I have eaten foods saying gluten-free and have checked the ingredients to make sure but some say caramel color. Does anyone know if caramel color contains gluten?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Tierra Farm
Lakefront Brewery



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Holidaily Brewing Co.


psawyer Proficient

If you are in North America, neither caramel color nor maltodextrin is a cause for concern. They are made from corn.

Malt must be avoided since it is almost always made from barley which is a source of gluten.

Outside North America, it is possible that caramel color or maltodextrin could be made from wheat. Both of these are highly processed, and so even if the source is from wheat, there is generally no detectable gluten in the ingredient. Since they are a very small component of the finished food, I don't worry about them. However, if you want to take a zero-tolerance position, you may want to investigate the origin of these ingredients if the food containing them is produced in Europe. To me, no detectable gluten in an ingredient comprising a very small fraction of the finished product is just not a cause for worry.

Others may have different views; these are mine.

kenlove Rising Star

I think it also depends on the level of sensitivity. Also we don't really know where some company might get the caramel coloring they use in ginger ale or something. It has always given me problems when I forget to read a label or someone has changed how they make something. In Hawaii we have this idiotic law saying that as long as a producer adds 51% value to a product it can be called Made in Hawaii. So people bring things in really cheap made in china or Malaysia mark up the price and call it local. It's not and often contains items that celiacs need to stay away from.

I'm extremely sensitive to any amount of gluten which for the past two years my body does not let me forget.

Ken

If you are in North America, neither caramel color nor maltodextrin is a cause for concern. They are made from corn.

Malt must be avoided since it is almost always made from barley which is a source of gluten.

Outside North America, it is possible that caramel color or maltodextrin could be made from wheat. Both of these are highly processed, and so even if the source is from wheat, there is generally no detectable gluten in the ingredient. Since they are a very small component of the finished food, I don't worry about them. However, if you want to take a zero-tolerance position, you may want to investigate the origin of these ingredients if the food containing them is produced in Europe. To me, no detectable gluten in an ingredient comprising a very small fraction of the finished product is just not a cause for worry.

Others may have different views; these are mine.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Carmel coloring is made by heating a starch, and that starch can be a gluten grain starch. Most times it is corn but not always. You do need to check with those. Be aware though that if it tests below a certain level the company can say it is gluten free so it is best to ask where the carmel color comes from rather than just asking if the product is gluten-free. Carmel coloring is the prime gluten source in most sodas that are not gluten-free.

Dextrin can be derived from wheat but with the new labeling laws they should tell you. Glucose can also be gluten derived but again the label should note that.

Maltodextrin in the US is always corn unless it says otherwise.

Sweetfudge Community Regular
If you are in North America, neither caramel color nor maltodextrin is a cause for concern. They are made from corn.

Malt must be avoided since it is almost always made from barley which is a source of gluten.

Outside North America, it is possible that caramel color or maltodextrin could be made from wheat. Both of these are highly processed, and so even if the source is from wheat, there is generally no detectable gluten in the ingredient. Since they are a very small component of the finished food, I don't worry about them. However, if you want to take a zero-tolerance position, you may want to investigate the origin of these ingredients if the food containing them is produced in Europe. To me, no detectable gluten in an ingredient comprising a very small fraction of the finished product is just not a cause for worry.

Others may have different views; these are mine.

Carmel coloring is made by heating a starch, and that starch can be a gluten grain starch. Most times it is corn but not always. You do need to check with those. Be aware though that if it tests below a certain level the company can say it is gluten free so it is best to ask where the carmel color comes from rather than just asking if the product is gluten-free. Carmel coloring is the prime gluten source in most sodas that are not gluten-free.

Dextrin can be derived from wheat but with the new labeling laws they should tell you. Glucose can also be gluten derived but again the label should note that.

Maltodextrin in the US is always corn unless it says otherwise.

I ALWAYS check on caramel coloring before eating it!!

hathor Contributor

I just read this morning a post on another board by a dietician who did some research. Maltodextrin from wheat need not be disclosed in the US if it is a food not covered by the FDA labeling law, that is, food that is regulated instead by the USDA.

Still I don't know if this is a big problem. (Not that I eat anything regulated by the USDA, I don't :lol: ) I don't know how common the wheat maltodextrin is in USDA products or whether it contains enough gluten to be a concern (Europe doesn't think so).

I would be more concerned about it as a potential hidden source of MSG myself.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
I just read this morning a post on another board by a dietician who did some research. Maltodextrin from wheat need not be disclosed in the US if it is a food not covered by the FDA labeling law, that is, food that is regulated instead by the USDA.

USDA, would that mean meats?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Daura Damm
Skout Organic



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Little Northern Bakehouse


hathor Contributor

Meat, poultry and egg products. Technically, something could have just a little meat in it and that would be USDA jurisdiction, not FDA. How the jurisdiction is divided up in practice is rather confusing. Researching yesterday, I found a public hearing for a rulemaking where the agencies were trying to rationalize things. From what I could tell, no action has been taken. Anyway, this is an explanation:

Open Original Shared Link

I found another explanation that 2 to 3 percent meat is enough for USDA jurisdiction. But I think for some items they have deferred to the FDA. It looks like the USDA decides what it wants jurisdiction for; what it doesn't want the FDA gets. I couldn't find a good and simple explanation at all. But finally I stopped because, heck, I'm a vegan so I'm not going to be eating USDA food anyway. Anyone else can research this for themselves if interested ...

It really makes no sense. Meat pizzas are regulated by the USDA. Cheese pizza by the FDA.

I also found that the USDA has said that they are going to issue allergen labelling rules like the FDA has. If I'm reading this correctly, the timetable calls for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to go out in March of 2008: Open Original Shared Link

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Meat, poultry and egg products. Technically, something could have just a little meat in it and that would be USDA jurisdiction, not FDA. How the jurisdiction is divided up in practice is rather confusing. Researching yesterday, I found a public hearing for a rulemaking where the agencies were trying to rationalize things. From what I could tell, no action has been taken. Anyway, this is an explanation:

Open Original Shared Link

I found another explanation that 2 to 3 percent meat is enough for USDA jurisdiction. But I think for some items they have deferred to the FDA. It looks like the USDA decides what it wants jurisdiction for; what it doesn't want the FDA gets. I couldn't find a good and simple explanation at all. But finally I stopped because, heck, I'm a vegan so I'm not going to be eating USDA food anyway. Anyone else can research this for themselves if interested ...

It really makes no sense. Meat pizzas are regulated by the USDA. Cheese pizza by the FDA.

I also found that the USDA has said that they are going to issue allergen labelling rules like the FDA has. If I'm reading this correctly, the timetable calls for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to go out in March of 2008: Open Original Shared Link

Thanks, they do make things sooooo very confusing don't they. I appretiate the links.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,609
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Michaela22
    Newest Member
    Michaela22
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Skout Organic


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Holidaily Brewing Co.



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...