Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Why Endoscopy If Blood Tests Show Celiacs?

gfny

Recommended Posts

gfny Newbie
gfny
Posted

If my blood tests came back very high (the one that is supposed to be 10 was over 100, and the one that is supposed to be around 5 was 67), and my doctor has told me that I have celiacs, then why do I have to get the endoscopy?

Also, can I do this all on my own? Or do I need to find a nutritionist even if my insurance won't cover it?

Thanks for the help!

Katie

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Tim-n-VA Contributor
Tim-n-VA
Posted

I have read on another Celiac oriented website that other auto-immune diseases can cause a false positive. The endoscopy is s check against that. I can't provide any information as to how common/likely that is.

Rikki Tikki Explorer
Rikki Tikki
Posted

Katie:

If I had it to do again knowing what I know now I would go with the blood test, stay gluten free and then have the blood drawn again in a couple of months and the numbers should go down to normal. If they don't have the doctor look for something else, if you feel better and the numbers are normal it would confirm in my own mind that it is celiac.

I think there is so much information out there now you can probably find out what is gluten free on your own, at least I didn't find that a nutirtionist was that helpful, she didn't know that much about it. This site will help you a lot.

buffettbride Enthusiast
buffettbride
Posted

Another reason to have the biopsy is that a positive biopsy result can also make you eligible for some medical studies, etc.

However, for your own peace of mind, with the blood test and trying the diet w/ a positive response, meaning an improvement of symptoms, would be diagnosis for me enough. I agree with the previous poster who said following up to see if your blood tests change after a period of months on the gluten-free diet. (My daughter went from the 100's range to the normal range with just 3 months being gluten-free).

If your insurance doesn't cover a nutritionist, many of which are not entirely knowledgeable about Celiac Disease, you can probably achieve the same guidance from a site like this and many books that are available about the disease.

I have learned more from this web site than any other resource.

Darn210 Enthusiast
Darn210
Posted

If the insurance won't pay for the nutritionist, I would skip it. By the time I was able to get in, I already knew just about everything she told me. I think she answered two questions for me and I could have posted them here and would have gotten the same answer.

My daughter's GI said that he thinks the endoscopy will probably be phased out over the next ten years or so. The old blood test (I think it was just the IgA) had a lot of false positives so then they felt the need to scope. The new test (Ttg) is much more reliable. He thinks that once the data proves it out, the scoping will be eliminated but that won't be for awhile yet.

WW340 Rookie
WW340
Posted

My GI diagnosed me based on my sky high numbers, but he did the endoscopy and colonoscopy to make sure there was nothing else going on.

I had been sick for a long time and he thinks my celiac disease has been active all my life, so he wanted to make sure there were no serious complications developing.

If your GI is only doing it for confirmation of the diagnosis then you might not need it, but he might be checking for other things as well depending on your symptoms and your age.

I saw a nutritionist and thought that was totally worthless for me. I had already read a lot about the diet by the time I saw her and she was giving out some old and incorrect information.

Furthermore, she was unable to answer the only question I had, so it was a waste for me.

Guest j_mommy
Guest j_mommy
Posted

I had an endoscopy as well. They use it as a gold standard for testing celiac....it's also good to check to see if anything else is happening.

I have never seen a nutritionist. My 6 month blood work was down to normal levels so I'm doing something right. I would wait, do checking and learning on your own. If you are having problems then go to see someone...preferably one knowledgable with celiac.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Gemini Experienced
Gemini
Posted
If my blood tests came back very high (the one that is supposed to be 10 was over 100, and the one that is supposed to be around 5 was 67), and my doctor has told me that I have celiacs, then why do I have to get the endoscopy?

Also, can I do this all on my own? Or do I need to find a nutritionist even if my insurance won't cover it?

Thanks for the help!

Katie

I was in the same boat as yourself....I failed 4 out of 5 of the blood tests done and my numbers were ridiculously high.

I may have considered an endoscopy but at that point, I was so sick I was losing a pound per day and the stupid doctors needed "time" to set up an endoscopy! By the time they got around to it, I would have had to be hospitalized from dehydration and low body weight.....no thanks! I immediately went gluten-free and 3 days later, my most severe symptoms started to subside all on their own. I had my answer.

If your doctor did an EMA blood test on you and that showed positive, you have celiac disease. It's specific to celiac disease only. I probably would advise going gluten-free based on blood work and if your symptoms do not improve within a week, you may have to reconsider the scope to see if there are any other problems. It really is personal choice and you have to do what makes you comfortable.

gfny Newbie
gfny
Posted
  • Author

Thanks everyone! This is such a wonderful site! I'm going to go ahead and have the endoscopy and skip the nutritionist for now! I'm trying to start the gluten free diet and hopefully it will get easier in time...right? You all are wonderful!

--Katie

P.S. My mom and my sister are both joining me on this gluten-free diet as they both have some of the Dermatitis Herpetiformis symptoms...gotta love family :D

Offthegrid Explorer
Offthegrid
Posted

I didn't have an endoscopy (blood test and very positive dietary response), so I'm sure someone else on here will come along with an answer, but I don't believe you're supposed to go gluten-free before the test, especially if you will have to wait a while.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted

Sounds like an absolute given that either gluten intolerance or celiac is a family problem for you!

Which means that the GI doc will be very happy--he'll make lots of money doing endoscopies on all of you to confirm what the bloodwork already tells him--you shouldn't eat gluten.

The bloodwork is more accurate than the endoscopy; you have 22 feet of intestine, and they only take a few 1/4"- 1/2" samples. Let's say a total of 6 samples--that's a total of 3 inches at most out of 262 total inches of intestines. Remember that villi damage is often patchy, and it becomes clear that the odds of hitting an affected spot are not great. So a negative biopsy doesn't mean that your villi are in good shape. It just means that they didn't happent o hit an affected area, and you still don't know if there ARE any affected areas, or how many if there are.

Not to say that there is no value whatsoever in an endoscopy; I am just saying that if gluten is the one and only problem, then you don't need an expensive invasive endoscopy along with the risks of twilight anesthesia. You just need to go off gluten.

Tim-n-VA Contributor
Tim-n-VA
Posted
.... you have 22 feet of intestine, and they only take a few 1/4"- 1/2" samples. Let's say a total of 6 samples--that's a total of 3 inches at most out of 262 total inches of intestines. Remember that villi damage is often patchy, and it becomes clear that the odds of hitting an affected spot are not great. So a negative biopsy doesn't mean that your villi are in good shape. It just means that they didn't happent o hit an affected area, and you still don't know if there ARE any affected areas, or how many if there are...

This is just not a realistic picture of what happens. The endoscopy is done by looking with a small camera at the small intestines and taking a biopsy on sites that appears to be damaged. This greatly increases the odds of finding damage if it exists versus the random sample alluded to in the quoted portion.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted

From a talk by Dr. Kenneth Fine:

"Small Bowel Biopsies

Samples of tissue lining the upper small intestine are taken with an instrument inserted through the throat and stomach. The tissue is examined for damage under a microscope. This test been a standard but it also has some reputation for not finding any damage in some patients that nevertheless have better health on a gluten fee diet. Sometimes the small bowel damage is patchy and is missed by the biopsy. Sometimes damage is too small to easily find under a microscope. Sometimes reactions happen elsewhere in the body without visibly affecting the upper small intestine.

Small bowel biopsies can be useful in seeing if the intestines have been very badly injured, but they cannot be relied upon for a confident proof that a patient has no reaction to gluten."

finally diagnosed Apprentice
finally diagnosed
Posted
If my blood tests came back very high (the one that is supposed to be 10 was over 100, and the one that is supposed to be around 5 was 67), and my doctor has told me that I have celiacs, then why do I have to get the endoscopy?

Also, can I do this all on my own? Or do I need to find a nutritionist even if my insurance won't cover it?

Thanks for the help!

Katie

I would have the endoscopy for the fact that, they will see how much damage you have, check for other damage as well to your small intestine and esophagus. I had my endoscopy done and found out that i had done damange to the bottom of my esophagus right into my intestine. I had patches that showed healing vili as well as damaged vili. When I have my follow up scope, they are hoping that the intestine is on its way of healing. They use this as a base, (kidna like a mammogram)its not fun, but on the flip side, there is no prep like the colonoscopy :). Your insurance company should cover the nutrition visit because you have a diganosis. But you really need to find someone who knows what celiac is. Good luck in what you decide. Lorrie

Tim-n-VA Contributor
Tim-n-VA
Posted
Small bowel biopsies can be useful in seeing if the intestines have been very badly injured, but they cannot be relied upon for a confident proof that a patient has no reaction to gluten."

There is no doubt that any medical test can yield false results and/or miss the problem. My issue was with you taking non-quantified phrases like "sometimes" and "usually not great" and throwing out numbers of inches to present a distorted view.

Of course a bioposy isn't proof that a patient wil have no reaction to gluten because it only tests for one type of reaction (classic celiac auto-immune villi damage) and doesn't test for classic allergy or other intolerances.

It comes down to what you want and need to know. If you just want to feel better, a dietary response without any other test is sufficient. But since many diseases occur in clusters, there are reasons to know exactly what is going in the body to cause the reaction to gluten. It isn't just to make money for a doctor.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. cristiana
      - cristiana replied to sha1091a's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Issues before diagnosis

      I agree, it so often overlooked! I live in the UK and I have often wondered why doctors are so reluctant to at least exclude it - my thoughts are perhaps the particular tests are expensive for the NHS, so therefore saved for people with 'obvious' symptoms. I was diagnosed in 2013 and was told immediately that my parents, sibling and children should...
    2. chrisinpa
      - chrisinpa commented on Scott Adams's article in Skin Problems and Celiac Disease
      2

      Celiac Disease and Skin Disorders: Exploring a Genetic Connection

      Maybe they can attribute certain skin conditions to either being susceptible to getting Celiac......or the other way around....but I have to ask if certain people are prone to Celiac because of genetics and some people aren't. It's kind of the same thing as what came first.....the chicken or the egg.?
    3. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      @xxnonamexx, There's labeling on those Trubar gluten free high fiber protein bars that say: "Manufactured in a facility that also processes peanuts, milk, soy, fish, WHEAT, sesame, and other tree nuts." You may want to avoid products made in shared facilities. If you are trying to add more fiber to your diet to ease constipation, considering...
    4. trents
      - trents replied to sha1091a's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Issues before diagnosis

      Welcome to celiac.com @sha1091a! Your experience is a very common one. Celiac disease is one the most underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed medical conditions out there. The reasons are numerous. One key one is that its symptoms mimic so many other diseases. Another is ignorance on the part of the medical community with regard to the range of symptoms that celiac...
    5. trents
      - trents commented on Jefferson Adams's article in Other Diseases and Disorders Associated with Celiac Disease
      6

      Celiac Disease Patients Face Higher Risk of Systemic Lupus

      What kind of practitioner did the blood test? Was this a medical doctor, a naturopathic doctor, a GI doc? I would certainly follow up with them and ask why they advised you not to eat red meat. I mean, it could be something like they, themselves, are a vegetarian and give that advice to everyone. Have you had an endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,692
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Ali Zaib
    Newest Member
    Ali Zaib
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Issues before diagnosis

      By cristiana · Posted

      I agree, it so often overlooked! I live in the UK and I have often wondered why doctors are so reluctant to at least exclude it - my thoughts are perhaps the particular tests are expensive for the NHS, so therefore saved for people with 'obvious' symptoms.  I was diagnosed in 2013 and was told immediately that my parents, sibling and children should be checked.  My parents' GP to this day has not put forward my father for testing, and my mother was never tested in her lifetime, despite the fact that they both have some interesting symptoms/family history that reflect they might have coeliac disease (Dad - extreme bloating, and his Mum clearly had autoimmune issues, albeit undiagnosed as such; Mum - osteoporosis, anxiety).  I am now my father' legal guardian and suspecting my parents may have forgotten to ask their GP for a test (which is entirely possible!) I put it to his last GP that he ought to be tested.  He looked at Dad's blood results and purely because he was not anemic said he wasn't a coeliac.  Hopefully as the awareness of Coeliac Disease spreads among the general public, people will be able to advocate for themselves.  It is hard because in the UK the NHS is very stretched, but the fallout from not being diagnosed in a timely fashion will only cost the NHS more money. Interestingly, a complete aside, I met someone recently whose son was diagnosed (I think she said he was 8).  At a recent birthday party with 8 guests, 4 boys out of the 8 had received diagnosis of Coeliac Disease, which is an astounding statistic  As far as I know, though, they had all had obvious gastric symptoms leading to their NHS diagnosis.  In my own case I had  acute onset anxiety, hypnopompic hallucinations (vivid hallucinations upon waking),  odd liver function, anxiety, headaches, ulcers and low iron but it wasn't until the gastric symptoms hit me that a GP thought to do coeliac testing, and my numbers were through the roof.  As @trents says, by the grace of God I was diagnosed, and the diet has pretty much dealt with most of those symptoms.  I have much to be grateful for. Cristiana
    • knitty kitty
      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @xxnonamexx, There's labeling on those Trubar gluten free high fiber protein bars that say: "Manufactured in a facility that also processes peanuts, milk, soy, fish, WHEAT, sesame, and other tree nuts." You may want to avoid products made in shared facilities.   If you are trying to add more fiber to your diet to ease constipation, considering eating more leafy green vegetables and cruciferous vegetables.  Not only are these high in fiber, they also are good sources of magnesium.  Many newly diagnosed are low in magnesium and B vitamins and suffer with constipation.  Thiamine Vitamin B1 and magnesium work together.  Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine has been shown to improve intestinal health.  Thiamine and magnesium are important to gastrointestinal health and function.  
    • trents
      Issues before diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to celiac.com @sha1091a! Your experience is a very common one. Celiac disease is one the most underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed medical conditions out there. The reasons are numerous. One key one is that its symptoms mimic so many other diseases. Another is ignorance on the part of the medical community with regard to the range of symptoms that celiac disease can produce. Clinicians often are only looking for classic GI symptoms and are unaware of the many other subsystems in the body that can be damaged before classic GI symptoms manifest, if ever they do. Many celiacs are of the "silent" variety and have few if any GI symptoms while all along, damage is being done to their bodies. In my case, the original symptoms were elevated liver enzymes which I endured for 13 years before I was diagnosed with celiac disease. By the grace of God my liver was not destroyed. It is common for the onset of the disease to happen 10 years before you ever get a diagnosis. Thankfully, that is slowly changing as there has developed more awareness on the part of both the medical community and the public in the past 20 years or so. Blessings!
    • knitty kitty
      Dizziness after eating green beans?

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @EndlessSummer, You said you had an allergy to trees.  People with Birch Allergy can react to green beans (in the legume family) and other vegetables, as well as some fruits.  Look into Oral Allergy Syndrome which can occur at a higher rate in Celiac Disease.   Switching to a low histamine diet for a while can give your body time to rid itself of the extra histamine the body makes with Celiac disease and histamine consumed in the diet.   Vitamin C and the eight B vitamins are needed to help the body clear histamine.   Have you been checked for nutritional deficiencies?
    • sha1091a
      Issues before diagnosis

      By sha1091a · Posted

      I found out the age of 68 that I am a celiac. When I was 16, I had my gallbladder removed when I was 24 I was put on a medication because I was told I had fibromyalgia.   going to Doctor’s over many years, not one of them thought to check me out for celiac disease. I am aware that it only started being tested by bloodwork I believe in the late 90s, but still I’m kind of confused why my gallbladder my joint pain flatulent that I complained of constantly was totally ignored. Is it not something that is taught to our medical system? It wasn’t a Doctor Who asked for the test to be done. I asked for it because of something I had read and my test came back positive. My number was quite high.Are there other people out here that had this kind of problems and they were ignored? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.