Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Doctor Follows Up Weeks Later?


dbuhl79

Recommended Posts

dbuhl79 Contributor

I'm sure many of you have followed my previous posts but I'll recap briefly. After a lot of digestive episodes, I was referred to a GI specialist (who specializes in Celiac Disease, IBS, Crohns). I was tested for Celiac Disease. After calling to receive my results, I was informed that they all came out negative. No exact numbers were given, nothing. And the assistant/nurse informed me that there was no follow up since they hadn't turned up positive.

I was disappointed to say the least that my GI doc had not bothered to have me come back, and review other avenues of diagnosis. Even if it was to generalize me and label me IBS I would of respected, but I didn't even get a follow up appt.

Now the doctors Phys. Asst has called and left a msg on my machine, asking how I am doing. If the Levsin they prescribed is working (which made me feel worse and I stopped taking it). Indicating they may want to see me again if I had issues still. This has been weeks since my appointment. Almost a month.

After getting these test results I've gone gluten-free and know that I feel normal when I am off gluten. When I occassionaly slip up and cheat (yep I'm just weak!!) I will feel the effects of it sometimes in 30 minutes or the next day or so.

I realize this is a personal choice, but I'm curious to get others opinion. Is itworth calling the doctors office back? Should I bother pursuing a follow up appointment? (And no I dont recommend self diagnosis) I'm just not sure its worth my time.

Thanks for any thoughts! :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tasha2004 Contributor

I went through this yesterday with the rheumatologist. Test results normal, therefore nothing else to do and no reason for me to come back.

I say, get your test results out of them, and then tell them what you are doing and how you are feeling better.

I intend to do this with this guy, if I can get some kind of different help somewhere else.

There is probably no point setting your foot back in their door, because they essentially dismissed you anyway.

plantime Contributor

Why go back to them? They obviously don't think they can help you, or they would have tried. The gastro that did my endo gave me a positive diagnosis in Sept, and I have yet to hear from him about it. No follow-ups, nothing. Just "you have celiac, don't eat wheat, barley, rye, or oats." It wasn't even him that I heard it from, it was from the surgeon that removed my gall bladder! So, why give your moeny to a doc that doesn't want it?

tarnalberry Community Regular

If the doctor is otherwise good, then I wouldn't necessarily decide to leave just yet, though it's always an option. I would go back (or call) and let him know the progress, since they asked. They may well not have called sooner because getting data that covered less than a month on the med you took may not mean anything to them. Doctors don't always call to follow up on every single thing, so I'd be willing to cut him some slack, but also proceed with caution. It's a tough call between a doctor being proactive and a patient being proactive. In the end, though, if you need more follow through, and less reliance on the patient to call back if he/she wants to pursue things further, then it sounds like this isn't the style of doctor for you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,743
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MistyMoon
    Newest Member
    MistyMoon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.