Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Would You Consider This A Positive Celiac Result?


todzwife

Recommended Posts

todzwife Rookie

I didn't do the gene panel, but I am pretty sure I should have. Here is what we DID do...

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 59 (Normal Range <10 Units)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 36 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score 1436 Units (Normal Range <300 Units)

I was really surprised how high the fecal fat score was (and more than a little worried)...

Should I take her for more testing?

FWIW, in December her RAST test showed an IGG of 112 for wheat (normal being under 15).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Enterolab cannot and does not diagnose Celiac. It can only indicate gluten intolerance (although the person may have Celiac).

You may want to consider having the Celiac blood panel done, and the endoscopy (not only to look for Celiac, but for other disorders). Your doctor can also order the gene test.

Ursa Major Collaborator

Those results are high. How old is your daughter? If she is under six the chance of blood work and endoscopy being a false negative are high.

It doesn't really matter if it is officially celiac disease or gluten intolerance. Your daughter is obviously at least gluten intolerant, and has definitely quite severe malabsorption.

If it was my kid, I'd put her on the gluten-free diet immediately.

Rachel--24 Collaborator

I would request the Celiac panel, endoscopy and possibly genetic testing as well....as Happygirl mentioned.

If you're looking for an official diagnosis that would be the best way to go....however, there is always a possibility of false negatives...particularly with the biopsy.

Once you have these tests completed you can start her on the diet and see if there is improvement.

Many people choose to go ahead with the diet without any additional testing. If it were my daughter I'd have the testing done asap and then put her on the diet.

Once you start the diet the tests are not accurate...if you choose to have them done later she would have to get back on gluten for several weeks prior to testing.

I tested negative for Celiac and positive through Enterolab. I also had a high malabsorption score but no Celiac gene. The diet did not resolve my symptoms and I had to continue searching. For me it was helpful that I'd already had the bloodtests and endoscopy to rule out Celiac as well as other conditions.

I do have an intolerance to gluten as well as many other foods but I do not have Celiac Disease.

holiday16 Enthusiast

My son had a similar fecal fat score. His was 1254. I can tell you our experience with pursuing more testing. He has a heart defect so at his cardio. appt. I mentioned it to his ped. cardiologist and he was very concerned. We had been seeing a decline in his energy, but had assumed it was heart related. He had a stress test done and his heart was def. not the problem. My son had already had the blood test through my family Dr., but it was not the complete panel. What he did have done came back negative.

We saw a ped. GI who ordered several tests including a gene test. The gene test from prometheus came back showing he's 16X more likely than the general population to have celiac disease. Based on that he did a scope which showed severe damage from reflux. He took two samples in places that looked probably for celiac to have analyzed and I'm not sure what exactly the testing was they did, but we were told the GI Dr. ordered something more in depth to make sure there were no mistakes. I think he only took two samples because he was concerned about bleeding related to his med.

Both samples came back negative for celiac, but the GI Dr. has him on a 3 month gluten free trial to be followed by a gluten challenge. Two weeks on the diet we're already seeing improvement so it's pretty obvious he needs to be gluten-free. He has much more energy and many of the issues with fatigue that were concerning are improving.

Our family Dr. even suggested we try the diet and see if we noticed an improvement, but in his case with his heart defect I really wanted to push for more. I want to make sure he has all the followup bloodwork etc. that he needs. It's worked out well for us because I was able to find out from this Dr. more information about what tests the rest of us need being gluten-free and dh is going to have the blood test for celiac. So far he's the only holdout :o) My oldest was diagnosed by Enterolab, but negative bloodwork. Mine was Enterolab, but negative bloodwork and my youngest was diagnosed on response alone. Diet really is the best test even if everything else comes back negative.

todzwife Rookie

Thank you. She's only 2 and had some pretty severe allergies (including wheat, eggs, peanuts and soy) and although she was wheat free she didn't have complete relief from her symptoms. So I chose to do enterolab because of her age. She was 90% gluten free during about a 3 month time, but ended up eating some graham crackers and had a MASSIVE meltdown for a few days. I'm considering getting her tested for actual celiac but really the treatment is the same...

I'm just worried about the fecal fat score. It's SO high.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    3. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    5. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,084
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    bigwave
    Newest Member
    bigwave
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AlwaysLearning
      Get tested for vitamin deficiencies.  Though neuropathy can be a symptom of celiac, it can also be caused by deficiencies due to poor digestion caused by celiac and could be easier to treat.
    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.