Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Manufactured In A Facility That Also Processes Wheat


strawberrygm

Recommended Posts

strawberrygm Enthusiast

Is it an absolute no-no for a celiac person to have foods that are safe themselves with the exception of being processed in a facility.....?

I just wonder how careful and clean the facility itself is and how high the chances for cc are? I mean, I know its better to be safe than sorry. But we also live in an age where you have to put warnings on coffee that it is hot.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



aikiducky Apprentice

If your household isn't completely gluten free your house is also "facility that processes wheat". ;) Of course in your own home it's easier control how clean it is, with manufacturers you can only hope.

I try to follow sound common sense, if the same manufacturer makes a product that also only has traces of gluten, then the chance of cross contamination is very small. But for a product like corn starch, if the same company also sells wheat flour, the chance of cross contamination seems higher to me, because flour is very difficult to clean 100%. Or if things are packaged in the same facility, but on separate lines, chances are smaller, same lines, higher. See what I mean?

If I have an alternative that is safer I choose that. But sometimes companies don't put that warning on a package, so a product without the warning might actually be less safe than a product with the warning.

In the end, you can only do your best, and keep an eye on symptoms. If your child seems healthy and happy and grows well, I think chances are you're doing enough. :)

Pauliina

psawyer Proficient

Also, keep in mind that any such label is completely voluntary. Just because you don't see such a statement does not mean that the facility/equipment does not handle wheat.

Some companies have a policy that they will always disclose such information, but many don't.

Now, if you see two products from the same manufacturer, and one says this and the other does not, then you might draw a conclusion about the product without the statement. But unless you contact the manufacturer to verify your conclusion, that is all that it is: a logical conclusion.

Perhaps one day this sort of label will be required by law. But that day isn't coming any time soon. :(

kbtoyssni Contributor

This one's a tough call. I tend not to eat food that's manufactured on the same equipment as wheat products. If it's just the same facility, though, I go by my own personal experience and that of other on this board. Some brands seem to have more problems than others.

mysecretcurse Contributor
This one's a tough call. I tend not to eat food that's manufactured on the same equipment as wheat products. If it's just the same facility, though, I go by my own personal experience and that of other on this board. Some brands seem to have more problems than others.

If I see that on the label I usually don't buy it.

I never thought it was a big deal but I see how workers are. I work in a pizza place where we make our own dough, cheese, etc. I watch them every day make a big batch of dough then a big batch of cheese in the same machine without washing it. There is LOTS of dough in our cheese. I figure its the same way in other places. Workers don't care, most of them don't even know about celiac.

And I STILL have issues trying to explain to people at work why I cant eat the cheese.

Genie Walker Newbie

After gotten sick a couple of times, if I see that statement on a label I will not buy it.

SchnauzerMom Rookie

I have not had any problems with products that say that.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams commented on Scott Adams's article in Product Labeling Regulations
      2

      FDA Moves to Improve Gluten Labeling—What It Means for People With Celiac Disease

    2. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      nothing has changed

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Is it gluten?

    4. - Seaperky replied to lizzie42's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      2

      Trip to Anaheim/Disney

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,351
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bea71
    Newest Member
    Bea71
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.