Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Trader Joe's Labelling Changes?


ChemistMama

Recommended Posts

ChemistMama Contributor

This is a warning to all you TJs fans out there. When I went to their web site, I noticed that their Gluten Free list was now a No Gluten Ingredients list. I believe they're doing this to comply with the new labelling that goes into effect this year that says you can't label something gluten free unless it's tested or is a 'naturally gluten free product'.

Be careful; my favorite marinara sauces (regular and organic plain marinara) are on the No Gluten Ingredients list, but the label says they're processed on the same equipment as wheat. I"ve bought their sauce before and it never had that warning on it. Possibly a change in manufacturers. Just wanted to give this board a heads up.

I can't tell you anything about reactions, since I buy it for my 2 year old celiac son.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Nancym Enthusiast

It's important to remember that a change in the wording doesn't necessarily reflect a change in ingredients. If it was fine before, then it is probably ok now.

ShayFL Enthusiast

I had a long conversation with someone at the Gluten Free Mall and she said that all of the labels will be changing soon. I believe she said September. Anyway, TJ is just getting ready for it.

It is true that unless a product is tested, they will not be able to call it "Gluten Free" (exceptions as noted). And they will all say processed on equipment that also processes (the common allergens such as peanuts, nuts, wheat, dairy, etc.)

She said to not be surprised that products I have been using that said "gluten free" no longer do.

ChemistMama Contributor
She said to not be surprised that products I have been using that said "gluten free" no longer do.

I figured. I've been keeping up with the FDA site on this, and even read most of the bulletin about the labelling changes. I'll search the board yet to see if other more sensitive people have had reactions to TJ"s products.

psawyer Proficient

Yes, folks, labels will be changing, even if the products themselves won't.

Until recently, in the USA, a claim of "Gluten Free" did not have any legal definition. Each company using the term could have their own definition, and did not have to adhere to any verifiable standard.

In the future, to make this claim, the product will have to adhere to a regulated standard backed up by testing to verify compliance. The test will, of course, never be able to prove the total absence of gluten. It will have a detection threshold which will be above zero. This topic (testing) has been discussed here many times in many threads. Testing adds to the cost of production, which in turn adds to the consumer cost of the product.

There are two basic options for manufacturers who used to say simply "Gluten Free."

They can continue to make the same product they always have, but change the label to say that there are no gluten ingredients. Or, they can make the same product they always have, and make no claim at all about gluten on the label, while maintaining a well known policy that any gluten ingredient will be clearly disclosed (Kraft and many others have had this policy for years).

The other option is to begin testing the product (and its ingredients) on a consistent basis to determine if detectable gluten is present. If detectable gluten is not found, then they will be able to make the "Gluten Free" claim on the label, while also carrying the disclaimer that they test for xx ppm of gluten content. If they don't state the detection threshold on the label, the law will specify it anyway. Many celiacs will then boycott their product, because they believe (incorrectly) that if the detection level of the test is 20 ppm, then any product passing the test must obviously contain 19.9 ppm!

I guess there is also a third option. They can intentionally add gluten (such as malt flavor) to avoid the entire issue. We don't really want that to happen, but if people keep demanding that producers guarantee a product to be 100% Gluten Free, this is an easy way for them to avoid having to deal with this. Kellogg's don't worry about this issue; they intentionally put barley malt into everything them make. No celiacs bugging the operators in their call center, wasting their time with silly questions about shared lines, cross-contamination, parts per million, or anything like that.

Some of you will not like what I have said, but please take some time to think about it.

ChemistMama Contributor
Yes, folks, labels will be changing, even if the products themselves won't.

...

Some of you will not like what I have said, but please take some time to think about it.

Peter - yep, I"m aware of all the changes. No more 'gluten free' labels on the canned goods from Walmart. My issue was that previously the TJs sauce did not have a warning, and now it does say it was processed on equipment that also processes wheat. So far my searches on this site haven't come up with people having any reactions to TJs stuff, but better safe than sorry, I"ll give the sauces to my Mom.

BTW, here's a recent update on the FDA labelling schedule:

Open Original Shared Link

"

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      nothing has changed

    2. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    3. - asaT replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      45

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    4. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

    5. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
    • asaT
      I was undiagnosed for decades. My ferritin when checked in 2003 was 3. It never went above 10 in the next 20 years. I was just told to "take iron". I finally requested the TTgIgA test in 2023 when I was well and truly done with the chronic fatigue and feeling awful. My numbers were off the charts on the whole panel.  they offered me an endoscopic biopsy 3 months later, but that i would need to continue eating gluten for it to be accurate. so i quit eating gluten and my intestine had healed by the time i had the biopsy (i'm guessing??). Why else would my TTgIgA be so high if not celiacs? Anyway, your ferritin will rise as your intestine heals and take HEME iron (brand 4 arrows). I took 20mg of this with vitamin c and lactoferrin and my ferritin went up, now sits around 35.  you will feel dramatically better getting your ferritin up, and you can do it orally with the right supplements. I wouldn't get an infusion, you will get as good or better results taking heme iron/vc/lf.  
    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.