Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Tcell Lymphocyte - Biopsy Positive


artselegance

Recommended Posts

artselegance Apprentice

I'm new to all this....so I'll make this as brief as possible.

I was diagnosed B12 Deficient in December, 2007. Treatment for this includes Weekly injections, Sublinguals daily, B-complex, folinic acid.

Have had stomach issues off and on for years and have taken stomach meds consistently for last 3-5 years. (prilosec, nexium, protonix). Last several months acid reflux, burping, indigestion, heartburn constant with everything I eat. Gastro did EGD and colonscopy on Aug 8th. Nurse called and Friday for me to come in on Monday to have blood testing done for celiac. She said the biopsy is showing positive for Celiac, but they must do further testing. She said the TCell Lymphoctye is what the biopsy shows.

Is this a sign of lymphoma. I have been reading this site all weekend about celiac and am truly overwhelmed. How long will it take blood tests to come back. I know they have to send them off. Usually if the biopsy is positive, does the bloodwork come back positive?

I'm now beginning to wonder about the cancer end of this.....my mind is running wild.

My tummy is distended, bloated, gurgling......and I guess I will just start gluten free tomorrow and see what happens.

Anyone with any insight please post.....I'm glad I found this wonderful site and look forward to making friends.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ShayFL Enthusiast

I saw your post and had to respond. I know you are worried. So I did some research online. I found this:

Open Original Shared Link

It sounds like that once you go on a Gluten Free diet your T-Cells will go back to normal. Try not to let complicated medical terms scare you (although I know it hard). I do not think you have cancer.

And regardless of what the blood tests say....you have intestinal evidence of Celiac. You need to be on a gluten-free diet for life. Make sure they test your total IgA. If you are deficient in this antibody, the other blood tests will be invalid, so they will need to do IgG on you.

artselegance Apprentice

Thanks for you response Shay. And you are so right about the medical terms. I realize at this point I need to concentrate on the healing and eating the proper foods. These forums help so much.

I have so much to learn because the evidence IS there.

nora-n Rookie

The biopsy is the official test for celiac, was yours just showing increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, or blunted villi, or something not totally conclusive? What did it say?

I guess they want the blood tests too, maybe in order to get a baseline so they can tell later how much the antibodies have gone down on the gluten-free diet. But one does not really NEED them if the biopsy came back positive.

in old times, they just did a repeat biopsy a year later to check how much you improved.

In kids, they did a repeat biopsy, and then the chid had to go back on gluten, and then be biopsied again, and then if they did not find damage this time, the diagnosis was taken away....Nowadays they put you on a gluten-free diet for life.

nora

artselegance Apprentice
The biopsy is the official test for celiac, was yours just showing increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, or blunted villi, or something not totally conclusive? What did it say?

I guess they want the blood tests too, maybe in order to get a baseline so they can tell later how much the antibodies have gone down on the gluten-free diet. But one does not really NEED them if the biopsy came back positive.

in old times, they just did a repeat biopsy a year later to check how much you improved.

In kids, they did a repeat biopsy, and then the chid had to go back on gluten, and then be biopsied again, and then if they did not find damage this time, the diagnosis was taken away....Nowadays they put you on a gluten-free diet for life.

nora

Nora, thanks for asking and just now I have requested a copy of the biopsy. The "RUDE" nurse told me yesterday that it would take 7 to 10 days to get the blood tests back. Soon as I get the report I will post. Thanks again.

firegazing Newbie

Sorry that the nurse was rude to you about the blood tests. I've had several such experiences now. Did she mean that it would take 7-10 days for -them- to get the results, or for them to tell you the results? I've had good luck getting a copy of my blood test results sooner when I tell the office that I need a copy for something else (for example, that I missed work/class while I was at the lab and I need to prove where I was).

artselegance Apprentice
Sorry that the nurse was rude to you about the blood tests. I've had several such experiences now. Did she mean that it would take 7-10 days for -them- to get the results, or for them to tell you the results? I've had good luck getting a copy of my blood test results sooner when I tell the office that I need a copy for something else (for example, that I missed work/class while I was at the lab and I need to prove where I was).

The lab work is sent to California. So it probably does take several days... I will give it until next Monday, then place another telephone call. Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.