Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten-free Poultry (chicken, Turkeys)


SEAliac

Recommended Posts

SEAliac Rookie

My mother-in-law talked to our local butcher about gluten-free turkeys. He suggested Bell and Evans brand. I just called them and talked to a woman named Jen. She assured me that they don't add anything to their birds so they are gluten-free. All their chicken and turkey leaves their packaging facility as fresh poultry. They may freeze some of it in a separate freezer room before shipping, but they don't add anything to the meat that would be problematic. The butcher was absolutely right!

The website showed that they even have a few types of breaded tenders and nuggest that are made using rice flour so they are gluten-free as well. This is now my favorite brand of poultry!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

Read the ingredients on any chicken or turkey. Gluten grains must be listed if included.

richard

SEAliac Rookie
Read the ingredients on any chicken or turkey. Gluten grains must be listed if included.

richard

I don't mean to be critical, but I think you may be misinformed. My understanding of the FDA's requirement for labeling is that "wheat", as one of the Big 8 allergens, must be listed. I haven't seen anything yet published by the FDA that says rye, barley, and oats must be listed as well. The appellation "gluten-free" is only voluntary; so if something has in it rye or barley derivatives that contain the gluten proteins, then the manufacturer isn't required to list it. Likewise, even if the manufacturer hasn't added anything WRBO, they don't have to label the item gluten-free. That is what scares me every time I see "natural flavorings" such as may be included in the broth injected into some poultry. Unless the label states gluten-free, I don't know that "natural flavorings" are safe. Two incidents in the last two months with rapid-onset symptoms after I ate chicken have convinced me to check each brand.

Lisa Mentor
I don't mean to be critical, but I think you may be misinformed. My understanding of the FDA's requirement for labeling is that "wheat", as one of the Big 8 allergens, must be listed. I haven't seen anything yet published by the FDA that says rye, barley, and oats must be listed as well. The appellation "gluten-free" is only voluntary; so if something has in it rye or barley derivatives that contain the gluten proteins, then the manufacturer isn't required to list it. Likewise, even if the manufacturer hasn't added anything WRBO, they don't have to label the item gluten-free. That is what scares me every time I see "natural flavorings" such as may be included in the broth injected into some poultry. Unless the label states gluten-free, I don't know that "natural flavorings" are safe. Two incidents in the last two months with rapid-onset symptoms after I ate chicken have convinced me to check each brand.

I believe that the USDA requires that ALL grains be labeled in meats and poultry. It is separate from the FDA Labeling Law.

(someone else can provide a supporting link)

ravenwoodglass Mentor
I believe that the USDA requires that ALL grains be labeled in meats and poultry. It is separate from the FDA Labeling Law.

(someone else can provide a supporting link)

Here it is:

Open Original Shared Link

Unfortunately we are still at risk from both barley malt used as a natural flavoring and unlike with FDA regulations, modified food starch does not have to be identified as a to source. When we see natual flavors or modified food starch added to meats we do need to check the safety for us. Hydrolized protein and actual grain does need to be declared.

MODIFIED FOOD STARCH - starch that has been chemically altered to improve its thickening properties. Before the starch is modified, it is separated from the protein through isolation techniques; therefore, the source of the starch used is not required on the label.

What are Labeling Requirements for Additives?

The statutes and regulations to enforce the statutes require certain information on labels of meat and poultry products so consumers will have complete information about a product. In all cases, ingredients must be listed on the product label, in the ingredients statement in order by weight, from the greatest amount to the least.

Substances such as spices and spice extractives may be declared as "natural flavors," "flavors," or "natural flavoring" on meat and poultry labels without naming each one. This is because they are used primarily for their flavor contribution and not their nutritional contribution.

Substances such as dried meat, poultry stock, meat extracts, or hydrolyzed protein must be listed on the label by their common or usual name because their primary purpose is not flavor. They may be used as flavor enhancers, binders, or emulsifiers. They must be labeled using the species of origin of the additive, for example, dried beef, chicken stock, pork extract, or hydrolyzed wheat protein.

Color additives must be declared by their common or usual names on labels, e.g., FD&C Yellow 5, or annatto extract, not collectively as colorings. These labeling requirements help consumers make choices about the foods they eat.

SEAliac Rookie

Here it is:

Open Original Shared Link

Thank you! As your answers always are, this is informative and much appreciated.

lovegrov Collaborator

When I've called the USDA they've told me that ANY grain MUST be listed because it adds nutritive value. I have been told specifically that barley has to be listed.

richard


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Jmartes71 commented on Scott Adams's article in Multiple Sclerosis and Celiac Disease
      4

      Gluten-Free Diet Linked to Reduced Inflammation and Improved Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis (+Video)

    2. - Scott Adams commented on Scott Adams's article in Product Labeling Regulations
      2

      FDA Moves to Improve Gluten Labeling—What It Means for People With Celiac Disease

    3. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      nothing has changed

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Is it gluten?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,351
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    giuseppe gamerra
    Newest Member
    giuseppe gamerra
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.