Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I'm Starting My 5 Y.o. On A gluten-free Trial

horsegirl

Recommended Posts

horsegirl Enthusiast
horsegirl
Posted

I was diagnosed with gluten intolerance (thru Enterolab as well as elimination diet) 2+ years ago.

I also have other food intolerances. I'm managing quite well, & have been able to reintroduce eggs.

My 5 y.o. DD has had chronic constipation since age 2, as well as frequent tummy aches & lots of gas. She seems to tire easily, has some anxiety/mood swings, though is generally an amazingly happy child. She was tested (blood) through Prometheus labs a year ago (their Celiac Plus panel), & was still within normal range on the gluten antibodies. She does possess 1 copy of the HLA-DQ8 gene (which she had to get from my DH because I'm double DQ-1, & I have no DQ8 at all). We've tried lots of things to try to manage the constipation/GI symptoms, including Miralax (when it gets bad enough), a short dairy elimination trial (with some success), & daily prunes. With her pediatrician's agreement, we've decided to start the gluten-free trial with her tomorrow, for a month. She already eats gluten-free more than 50% of the time, since that's how I cook. She also frequently makes gluten-free choices on her own (breads, snacks).

Now we're making everything 100% gluten-free for a month, to see what effects it has on her GI & other symptoms. She's in total agreement with it, & even asked to do it because she's tired of tummy aches.

My question though is, do we really need to put her through any other tests for gluten intolerance/celiac disease (other blood tests, EGD)? My feeling is, I know she's at risk because I'm already diagnosed, & she has several symptoms. I don't need a "formal" diagnosis for her, do I? Or is seeing any positive changes on the elimination trial enough?

Any suggestions or ideas would be appreciated.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


horsegirl Enthusiast
horsegirl
Posted
  • Author

I guess when I post so late at night (west coast time) it gets lost in the new posts!

Anybody have any suggestions or advice?

Thanks again.

Darn210 Enthusiast
Darn210
Posted

If your pediatrician is on board with it, then I think you should be good. If you find that your daughter needs to be gluten free and you have trouble with the school system (that's really the only thing I can think of), then you've got your pediatrician backing you up.

sugarsue Enthusiast
sugarsue
Posted

Since it's fairly non-invasive, I would do a celiac panel blood test if you have not already done it and then go gluten free. I have one dd with a positive gluten intolerance test and one with negative. Both are gluren free now and doing amazingly. There is no doubt in my mind that they need to be gluten free. I do struggle sometimes whether they have celiac but if they/we need to figure that out when they get older we can cross that bridge.

So many people think you need gluten to be healthy and it's just not true so your child will be better off with your family history and her history.

GOOD LUCK!

I hate gluten Apprentice
I hate gluten
Posted

Since she has already been tested and carrys one of the Genes and is starting to be sympomatical, I would do it. I did do the panel on my son and he was neg but have seen a life changing difference in him since going gluten free anyway. (my family has a long history of autoimmune dz, I also went gluten free after a neg blood test and it has been a life saver.) I saw a gi doctor on my peds request for the celiac panel, and have not seen my ped since. I will be going to him in may with my child (5 also) check up and a list of major quality of life improvements that we have been struggleing with for years. As you prob. already know, if it is a gluten intol. there may also be a casien intol. I will be giving up casien- milk- on both of us after three month. ( I know I am having problems with it, but thats what they say is ideal to wait 3 months after starting the diet) my childs school has been great, but he is still in preschool. I talked to his k and they seem to be on board as well. One month is not going to hurt anything other than results on a blood test. Good luck in your decision.

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted
Since it's fairly non-invasive, I would do a celiac panel blood test if you have not already done it and then go gluten free.

This is a good thought, but since she's mostly gluten-free already, a negative result wouldn't really tell you much. If your doc is backing you, I say just go with the diet.

MammaG Newbie
MammaG
Posted

Do the diet. There really isn't much else to say. You are Celiac she has the gene and is having symptoms- It would be hard to say she doesn't have it. If you really want something else to test then do the poop test like you did through enterolab. -I did it for me and my son. But I think you already know what you'll find out.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


626Belle Newbie
626Belle
Posted

I agree with your decision to test out the diet.

I don't have kids, but a year ago, I started having these horrible symptoms. My blood panel came back negative for celiac, but I had also been gluten free for 2 weeks already because I was absolutely miserable and finally something was working. I'm not going back anytime soon for testing because I would have to endure that pain again just to hope for a diagnosis.

horsegirl Enthusiast
horsegirl
Posted
  • Author

I'm curious to see why you say I'm celiac? Just wondering, because since my bloodwork & biopsy were both negative, my doctor diagnosed me with "non-celiac gluten intolerance". I don't know that there's truly a difference between the 2 titles, & I know that with my neurological problems on gluten, I'll never eat the stuff again.

Like I said, just curious, since you're the first one to say I have actual celiac.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,678
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Kristina S
    Newest Member
    Kristina S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.