Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Possible Misdiagnosis?


ChristineSelhi

Recommended Posts

ChristineSelhi Rookie

Hi! I discovered my gluten intolerance through an elimination diet years ago after a frustrating round with a dermatologist and a primary care physician who thought the break out on my face was anything from herpes to a bacterial infection. I put the brakes on when the dermatologist wanted to put me on antibiotics for 6 months (!). I was convinced of an allergy, and decided to try the diet. Lo and behold the rash disappeared after two weeks, and returned only with the re-introduction of wheat. I had a whole slew of other symptoms over the years that pointed to gluten intolerance--IBS, chronic sinus infections, ovarian cysts, vitamin D deficiency.

I then sought medical attention at a Celiac Specialist up at Columbia Medical about 5 years ago. A doctor took a biopsy from my stomach (not my intestines) and did a DNA test to rule out celiac disease. Still I met with a nutritionist and reviewed diet plans and was on and off gluten for 5 years. Most recently I have been gluten free for about a year. Except for a few unexpected slips (mostly generic medication mishaps--DON'T TAKE THERAFLU!!!!)

Recently I have been getting very ill from trace amounts of gluten (such as those in generic medications, or theraflu) and it seems my symptoms have gotten worse--extreme fatigue, very bad headaches, stomach aches a few hours after ingestions, and dizziness, and as always the rash around my mouth.

I was told by this doctor years ago that they could rule our celiac because I didn't have a particular strain of DNA that all folks with Celiac have. I suspect though that this is more than an intolerance. A couple people I know who are gluten intolerant tell me they think I am a celiac, because my sensitivity is so debilitating. Does anyone know if, despite this DNA test, it is still possible to have celiac disease?

Maybe it doesn't matter, but I would like to know, and there is no way I am willing to re-introduce gluten to get the biopsy done. :o I think that would do more harm than good.

Thanks for any responses!!

ChristineSelhi


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lovemy4babies Rookie
Hi! I discovered my gluten intolerance through an elimination diet years ago after a frustrating round with a dermatologist and a primary care physician who thought the break out on my face was anything from herpes to a bacterial infection. I put the brakes on when the dermatologist wanted to put me on antibiotics for 6 months (!). I was convinced of an allergy, and decided to try the diet. Lo and behold the rash disappeared after two weeks, and returned only with the re-introduction of wheat. I had a whole slew of other symptoms over the years that pointed to gluten intolerance--IBS, chronic sinus infections, ovarian cysts, vitamin D deficiency.

I then sought medical attention at a Celiac Specialist up at Columbia Medical about 5 years ago. A doctor took a biopsy from my stomach (not my intestines) and did a DNA test to rule out celiac disease. Still I met with a nutritionist and reviewed diet plans and was on and off gluten for 5 years. Most recently I have been gluten free for about a year. Except for a few unexpected slips (mostly generic medication mishaps--DON'T TAKE THERAFLU!!!!)

Recently I have been getting very ill from trace amounts of gluten (such as those in generic medications, or theraflu) and it seems my symptoms have gotten worse--extreme fatigue, very bad headaches, stomach aches a few hours after ingestions, and dizziness, and as always the rash around my mouth.

I was told by this doctor years ago that they could rule our celiac because I didn't have a particular strain of DNA that all folks with Celiac have. I suspect though that this is more than an intolerance. A couple people I know who are gluten intolerant tell me they think I am a celiac, because my sensitivity is so debilitating. Does anyone know if, despite this DNA test, it is still possible to have celiac disease?

Maybe it doesn't matter, but I would like to know, and there is no way I am willing to re-introduce gluten to get the biopsy done. :o I think that would do more harm than good.

Thanks for any responses!!

ChristineSelhi

I dont know much about your case, or dna testing for that, but Ill tell ya one thing :) Doctors dont know everything. They are not all knowing, and the medical feild is every changing. With that, I would say yes, you can have celiacs and not have the gene.

My son has had every weird syptom a 2 year old could have. And doctors dont know why. They just dont know everything.

leadmeastray88 Contributor

DNA testing is not diagnostic. It is only useful in seeing if you have the "appropriate" genes and if it could be possible for you to develop the disease. It doesn't mean you will, and it doesn't mean you won't. The problem is that not all diagnosed Celiacs have these "recognized" genes and/or the US/Canada don't recognize as many Celiac genes as other countries do. I'm no expert on genetic testing, but you obviously have a problem with gluten. Have you ever had the bloodwork done?

ChristineSelhi Rookie
DNA testing is not diagnostic. It is only useful in seeing if you have the "appropriate" genes and if it could be possible for you to develop the disease. It doesn't mean you will, and it doesn't mean you won't. The problem is that not all diagnosed Celiacs have these "recognized" genes and/or the US/Canada don't recognize as many Celiac genes as other countries do. I'm no expert on genetic testing, but you obviously have a problem with gluten. Have you ever had the bloodwork done?

Hi Kim,

Thanks so much for your response. I never did do the bloodwork, because by the time I saw the doctor, I had cut off my gluten intake. I have heard of people still having the antibodies after they went gluten free.

I guess in one sense it doesn't really matter, it's just one likes to know what the real problem is, you know! Also, in a way, it would be easier to just tell people that I am a celiac, and then they take me seriously. Working through it with the family can be tough.

Anyway, I will talk to my physician about doing the bloodwork.

Regardless, I have gotten much more serious about making sure gluten is not in anything that comes near me. I just can't go losing whole sick days because of a lazy moment!

Appreciate your input very much. That helps me to understand. I was so new to the celiac world, I didn't know what questions to ask 5 years ago, and I have had so many people say to me recently are you SURE you're not a celiac that I have sort begun to wonder myself.

Thanks again!

ChristineSelhi Rookie
I dont know much about your case, or dna testing for that, but Ill tell ya one thing :) Doctors dont know everything. They are not all knowing, and the medical feild is every changing. With that, I would say yes, you can have celiacs and not have the gene.

My son has had every weird syptom a 2 year old could have. And doctors dont know why. They just dont know everything.

Yeah, they are frustrating sometimes. I have a new one who seems pretty good, but I have been not eating gluten for so long and feeling so good, I didn't think to bring it up with her....a little daft of me I guess, but oh well. I will talk to her about it, but as I said to Kim, the official diagnosis would be nice, to help me to explain it to friends and family who sometimes think I exaggerate. But, maybe I'll just use the word to help them understand ;) Thankfully, I have a very supportive husband who sees it all, and helps me at restaurants and with dinner parties. He's practically gluten free by default. Thanks, best of luck with your son. I can imagine it must be so hard with the little ones!

ang1e0251 Contributor

Post your DNA test results here. There are those who are well versed in genetics and could give you more info than might have been available at the time.

ChristineSelhi Rookie
Post your DNA test results here. There are those who are well versed in genetics and could give you more info than might have been available at the time.

Sadly, I was far a less responsible patient back then and have moved a couple of times. I will try and hunt them down, and see what I can find! I still have the number for the Rx though, I will see if I can get a copy.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

While most 95%+ have the two recognized genes associated with Celiac (HLA DQ2 & HLA DQ8), not every single Celiac has one of the genes.

Also, you can have just as debilitating symptoms with non-Celiac gluten intolerance as someone with Celiac - or, for some, those with ncgi have more symptoms than Celiac.

Open Original Shared Link

On a day to day basis, treatment is the same - the gluten-free diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,689
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sw1
    Newest Member
    Sw1
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Grahamsnaturalworld
      Where can I find a gastro in adelaide who can diagnose refractory celiac disease have seen 3 so far and don't understand the most obvious question, why my celiac symptoms did not resolve on a gluten free diet the symptoms just got worse as it is attacking my nervous system. 
    • ShariW
      I recently traveled to Spain and Portugal. I was with a tour group, they knew I needed to be gluten-free and made sure the kitchens preparing the group meals were aware. But just in case, I took Gliadin-X with me and took it for every evening meal - and most other meals. The one time I got glutened was from lunch early in the trip - had to be from cross-contamination. I had not taken Gliadin-X before that meal, which made for a pretty miserable day. Learned my lesson... 😞 
    • Hummer01
      Hi trents, thanks for the response.  The 2nd opinion doctor said that if my CRP is still elevated at that time, he would advise me to look at Crohns/UC or another autoimmune issue. The colonoscopy I had this year seemed to rule those 2 out for now so he still believed celiac may explain it. No previous doctors have suggested any explanation for it even after calling to tell me it was a concerning result.  I guess it feels tough knowing I have positive blood testing, permissive genetics, and visible duodenum changes... and somehow it's NCGS instead of celiac. I'm still surprised the biopsies came back negative when the doctor was so sure they would be positive.
    • trents
      "He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac." But with if the elevated CRP levels are caused by some other inflammatory process going on in your body? "She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate." Totally wrong! This is a highly accurate test for celiac disease, that requires specialized expertise to perform and interpret, and it is more expensive than other blood tests. It is generally used as a last test to confirm celiac disease after a positive tTG-IgA test. The sensitivity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals with the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the sensitivity is generally very high, ranging from 90% to 98%. This means that the test can accurately detect celiac disease in a significant percentage of people who have the condition. The specificity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals without the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the specificity is also high, typically around 95% to 100%. This indicates that the test can effectively rule out celiac disease in individuals who do not have the condition. Taken from the following article: Looking at the whole picture, I am wondering if you are transitioning from NCGS to celiac disease. Some experts in the gluten disorder field believe NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
    • Hummer01
      Hi all, just wanted to post an update.  I have been gluten free for about 1.5 months now and seeing improvement already in the bathroom.  Recently I had a visit with another GI doctor for a 2nd opinion. He said that while my blood tests and scope are not a "slam dunk" for celiac, he believes it's more likely than not that I have it. His advice was to stay with a celiac-level gluten free diet (no CC) for 6-12 months then retest to make sure TTG-IGA is still negative. He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac.  Today I had a follow up with the original GI that performed the scope. She is confident it is NCGS and says I can still have gluten sometimes. When I asked about the visible duodenum damage, she said it is just "irritation" from gluten because the biopsies were negative. She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate."  I guess I'm having trouble reconciling the totally different advice from these 2 GI's. I want to believe the new doctor more at this point because what he said just makes more sense to me, and he gave an actionable timeline for possible next steps. Feeling lost and disappointed at this point and wanted to write it down here in case anyone has input. Thank you.   
×
×
  • Create New...