Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing For Celiac


samanthaw

Recommended Posts

samanthaw Newbie

Hello All,

Like many of you, I am struggling to determine if I have celiac disease. I recently saw my general practitioner for a "well woman" exam -- I had complaints of fatigue, depression -- just not feeling like myself. She ran blood tests including ferritin levels and determined that I was anemic. I then underwent an endoscopy and colonoscopy to make sure I wasn't bleeding internally (I'm 42 years old). The colonoscopy was clear but the endoscopy revealed "mild villous atrophy with intraepithelial lymphocytes consistent with celiac disease". The GI then ran antibody blood tests, which he said were negative for celiac disease. I have not heard back on the results of the gene testing. He now wants me to wait about 3 months and do another endoscopy to see if the results are the same. He does not seem to want to diagnose celiac disease and downplays the illness thinking it is the "popular" disease of the day.

My question to all of you is had anyone had similiar test results and if so, did your doctor diagnose you with celiac disease? Can a person have the results that I had from the small bowel biopsy and not have celiac disease?

Any help provided will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Sabrina


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor
Hello All,

Like many of you, I am struggling to determine if I have celiac disease. I recently saw my general practitioner for a "well woman" exam -- I had complaints of fatigue, depression -- just not feeling like myself. She ran blood tests including ferritin levels and determined that I was anemic. I then underwent an endoscopy and colonoscopy to make sure I wasn't bleeding internally (I'm 42 years old). The colonoscopy was clear but the endoscopy revealed "mild villous atrophy with intraepithelial lymphocytes consistent with celiac disease". The GI then ran antibody blood tests, which he said were negative for celiac disease. I have not heard back on the results of the gene testing. He now wants me to wait about 3 months and do another endoscopy to see if the results are the same. He does not seem to want to diagnose celiac disease and downplays the illness thinking it is the "popular" disease of the day.

My question to all of you is had anyone had similar test results and if so, did your doctor diagnose you with celiac disease? Can a person have the results that I had from the small bowel biopsy and not have celiac disease?

Any help provided will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Sabrina

Please get a new doctor, one that is knowledgeable and one that doesn't downplay the facts.

Your villous atrophy IS consistent with Celiac Disease and IS considered a diagnosis.

Testing for Celiac can render false negatives but never false positives. Coupled with a positive dietary response, it's a pretty sure bet that you do have Celiac.

Welcome to the Club!

lizard00 Enthusiast

As Momma Goose said, please get another opinion.

Many people can test negative with the blood testing, but the biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, especially when the blood tests are negative.

Tallforagirl Rookie
Your villous atrophy IS consistent with Celiac Disease and IS considered a diagnosis.

Testing for Celiac can render false negatives but never false positives. Coupled with a positive dietary response, it's a pretty sure bet that you do have Celiac.

There can be other causes for villous atrophy, so do make sure your doctor rules out any other causes before diagnosing celiac disease. Since you don't have positive blood panel results it may not pay to jump to conclusions before checking out all possibilities.

Other causes of villous atrophy include:

"Cow

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Did this doctor tell you to go on the diet strictly and then he would rebiopsy or did he tell you to keep eating gluten? Some doctors are very reluctant to diagnose celiac and will tell us to keep on gluten until the villi are totally destroyed.

IMHO you should do the former. Go off of gluten strictly and then if symptoms have not resolved start looking for the 'other possible reasons' for the villi atrophy. Most of the other causes are things that can be related to celiac or that can be found in tandum with it.

In addition get your hands on the actual results from the blood tests along with the lab's ranges. There are doctors that will consider a low positive a negative and tell the patients the test was negative if the results were only a few points into the positive range. As for the gene tests do not consider it is a definte 'you don't have it' if you do not have DQ2 or 8. Those are the only celiac related genes that are tested for in the US. In other countries there are 7 others that are also celiac related but doctors here do not look for them.

samanthaw Newbie
Did this doctor tell you to go on the diet strictly and then he would rebiopsy or did he tell you to keep eating gluten? Some doctors are very reluctant to diagnose celiac and will tell us to keep on gluten until the villi are totally destroyed.

IMHO you should do the former. Go off of gluten strictly and then if symptoms have not resolved start looking for the 'other possible reasons' for the villi atrophy. Most of the other causes are things that can be related to celiac or that can be found in tandum with it.

In addition get your hands on the actual results from the blood tests along with the lab's ranges. There are doctors that will consider a low positive a negative and tell the patients the test was negative if the results were only a few points into the positive range. As for the gene tests do not consider it is a definte 'you don't have it' if you do not have DQ2 or 8. Those are the only celiac related genes that are tested for in the US. In other countries there are 7 others that are also celiac related but doctors here do not look for them.

samanthaw Newbie
Please get a new doctor, one that is knowledgeable and one that doesn't downplay the facts.

Your villous atrophy IS consistent with Celiac Disease and IS considered a diagnosis.

Testing for Celiac can render false negatives but never false positives. Coupled with a positive dietary response, it's a pretty sure bet that you do have Celiac.

Welcome to the Club!

Thanks Lisa and I do plan to get a new doctors that hopefully specializes in patients with Celiad Disease.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



samanthaw Newbie
There can be other causes for villous atrophy, so do make sure your doctor rules out any other causes before diagnosing celiac disease. Since you don't have positive blood panel results it may not pay to jump to conclusions before checking out all possibilities.

Other causes of villous atrophy include:

"Cow

samanthaw Newbie
Did this doctor tell you to go on the diet strictly and then he would rebiopsy or did he tell you to keep eating gluten? Some doctors are very reluctant to diagnose celiac and will tell us to keep on gluten until the villi are totally destroyed.

IMHO you should do the former. Go off of gluten strictly and then if symptoms have not resolved start looking for the 'other possible reasons' for the villi atrophy. Most of the other causes are things that can be related to celiac or that can be found in tandum with it.

In addition get your hands on the actual results from the blood tests along with the lab's ranges. There are doctors that will consider a low positive a negative and tell the patients the test was negative if the results were only a few points into the positive range. As for the gene tests do not consider it is a definte 'you don't have it' if you do not have DQ2 or 8. Those are the only celiac related genes that are tested for in the US. In other countries there are 7 others that are also celiac related but doctors here do not look for them.

He told me to continue eating gluten I suppose with the thought that he would see if the problem cleared without a gluten-free diet and then he would assume I did not have celiac disease. However, I have read that symptoms of Celiac Disease can wax and wane. What I failed to ask him is what would he then recommend if the biopsy showed abnormal results. Would I then go on a gluten-free diet and undergo a third endoscopy????

I have requested the lab reports and hope to get them soon. I may ask for your IMHO again.

Thanks so much!!

happygirl Collaborator

You may want to post on the board asking for an experienced doctor in your area, or contact a local Celiac support group and ask who their members use.

You do not have to have positive bloodwork and biopsy for diagnosis.

It'll be interesting to see which bloodwork he ran.

Also, there is some research that indicates that "lesser" damage (mild) isn't often picked up on blood tests. The blood tests are generally more accurate with "more" damage.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,327
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PattyPagnanelli
    Newest Member
    PattyPagnanelli
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents, but thank you for bringing this up here!
    • Jane02
      Hi @trents, yes I've had my levels checked in Dec 2025 which revealed vit D deficiency. I considered eggs although they only contain about 45 IU vitamin D/egg. I need 2000 IU vitamin D for maintenance as per my doctor. Although now, I likely need way more than that to treat the deficiency. My doctor has yet to advise me on dosing for deficiency. I've also considered cod liver oil, although again, if it's processed in a facility that has gluten, especially on flour form, I worried to test it, even if they have protocols in place to mitigate cross-contamination with gluten.
    • trents
      Welcome to celiac.com, @Jane02! Have you had your serum D levels checked for deficiency/sufficiency? What about cod liver oil? Egg yolks can also be a good source of vitamin D.
    • Jane02
      Hello, I'm very discouraged. I've been trying to find a safe vitamin mineral supplement brand for months and am tired of testing one after the other and experiencing my typical 'glutening' reactions. I'm really feeling the nutritional deficiencies set in. I'm doing the best I can to get these nutrients from my food, although it's impossible for me to intake enough vitamin D as I can't have dairy and have insufficient sun exposure in the northern hemisphere. I've tried B Complex from Country Life (certified gluten-free) - horrible reaction. I've tried Metagenics vitamin D tab (certified glute-free) - bad reaction. I've tried liquid vitamin D Thorne and D Drops - reactions were mild since I tried a drop of a drop. I understand there could be other things I'm reacting to in my diet, although my diet/intake is pretty consistent with minimal variables so I do think it's something in these supplements. I understand I could be reacting to the active ingredient vitamin/mineral itself or even the filler ingredients. I tried the vitamin D drops since the only filler ingredient is coconut oil, in some brands, which I know I can tolerate really well on its own - I cook with coconut oil frequently and have no 'glutening' reactions at all. Perhaps I'm reacting to the vitamin D itself, although I eat fatty fish every few days, an entire fillet with no 'glutening' reactions, which contains anywhere between 400-600 IU per fillet so I shouldn't be sensitive to vitamin D. All this to say, I'm desperately looking for at least a safe vitamin D supplement. Does anyone know of a safe vitamin D supplement brand? I'd love to know if there are any supplement brands that have absolutely no gluten (especially in flour form) in their facilities. I've heard of Kirkman having no grains in their facility - I may try this brand. Has anyone reacted to this brand?   
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com communiuty, @Matthias! Yes, we have been aware that this can be an issue with mushrooms but as long as they are rinsed thoroughly it should not be a problem since the mushrooms don't actually incorporate the gluten into their cellular structure. For the same reason, one needs to be careful when buying aged cheeses and products containing yeast because of the fact that they are sometimes cultured on gluten-containing substrate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.