Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Wall St Journal-general Mills "wheat Free" Push


babysteps

Recommended Posts

babysteps Contributor

Here's the link to the article, although it may require a subscription to see the whole thing:

Open Original Shared Link

Basically, General Mills figured out that people who eat gluten-free are very loyal customers. So their marketing costs for gluten-free can be low - some booths at gluten-free events, a little targeted advertising on gluten-free websites, and away they go. Article says General Mills tests their production facility to "assure a gluten free environment" and that they expect to charge about $2 more per box of gluten-free Betty Crocker mix vs. non-gluten-free.

While the headline says "wheat free", the entire article is about gluten-free (including a sentence about increasing diagnosis of celiac disease).

There's also a graph that cites "Mintel Global New Products Database" as source that shows almost 6,000 new products in 2008 claimed to be gluten-free, but that less than a quarter of those were US-based.

I have a subscription and it lets me email an accessible link of the article, if you are interested in reading the whole thing and the link doesn't work for you, send me a pm (I am about to head out for a long weekend, so if you don't hear from me before Monday Jul 6th don't get worried).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kenlove Rising Star

Thanks for posting the link. Been hearing about this all day. COUld nto see the whole story but the comments were interesting!

ken

Here's the link to the article, although it may require a subscription to see the whole thing:

Open Original Shared Link

Basically, General Mills figured out that people who eat gluten-free are very loyal customers. So their marketing costs for gluten-free can be low - some booths at gluten-free events, a little targeted advertising on gluten-free websites, and away they go. Article says General Mills tests their production facility to "assure a gluten free environment" and that they expect to charge about $2 more per box of gluten-free Betty Crocker mix vs. non-gluten-free.

While the headline says "wheat free", the entire article is about gluten-free (including a sentence about increasing diagnosis of celiac disease).

There's also a graph that cites "Mintel Global New Products Database" as source that shows almost 6,000 new products in 2008 claimed to be gluten-free, but that less than a quarter of those were US-based.

I have a subscription and it lets me email an accessible link of the article, if you are interested in reading the whole thing and the link doesn't work for you, send me a pm (I am about to head out for a long weekend, so if you don't hear from me before Monday Jul 6th don't get worried).

daphniela Explorer
Here's the link to the article, although it may require a subscription to see the whole thing:

Open Original Shared Link

Basically, General Mills figured out that people who eat gluten-free are very loyal customers. So their marketing costs for gluten-free can be low - some booths at gluten-free events, a little targeted advertising on gluten-free websites, and away they go. Article says General Mills tests their production facility to "assure a gluten free environment" and that they expect to charge about $2 more per box of gluten-free Betty Crocker mix vs. non-gluten-free.

While the headline says "wheat free", the entire article is about gluten-free (including a sentence about increasing diagnosis of celiac disease).

There's also a graph that cites "Mintel Global New Products Database" as source that shows almost 6,000 new products in 2008 claimed to be gluten-free, but that less than a quarter of those were US-based.

I have a subscription and it lets me email an accessible link of the article, if you are interested in reading the whole thing and the link doesn't work for you, send me a pm (I am about to head out for a long weekend, so if you don't hear from me before Monday Jul 6th don't get worried).

I haven't found the Betty Crocker gluten free mixes yet. I just live without desserts unless, I make it from scratch. If its $2 more, I will never buy it. A lot of times the stores around here have 5 for $5 sales on Betty Crocker mixes. If that's not going to include the gluten free mixes, I will live without.

Mskedi Newbie

Here the Betty Crocker mixes were $1 more than the other mixes, so I bought them for a reasonable price. Not bad. I haven't tried them yet... I don't actually often make desserts, but I was so excited to see them that I couldn't resist.

That article was interesting. I didn't think about how much they could save on marketing costs since they can depend on a pretty loyal market for their gluten-free products.

  • 1 month later...
Maddy1 Newbie
Here the Betty Crocker mixes were $1 more than the other mixes, so I bought them for a reasonable price. Not bad. I haven't tried them yet... I don't actually often make desserts, but I was so excited to see them that I couldn't resist.

That article was interesting. I didn't think about how much they could save on marketing costs since they can depend on a pretty loyal market for their gluten-free products.

A friend just found them for me in her local Roche Bros. They were on special for 2/$7. It's a little steep when they're not on sale though.

But let me tell you.........DELICIOUS and very easy! I've had the brownies and the chocolate cake, which I made cupcakes with and froze the extra for later. Nobody, not even my very picky husband knew they were gluten-free. Making the cupcakes made sense for freezing and portion control.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,209
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deeknip
    Newest Member
    Deeknip
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...